zawakawakab14_ESO wrote: »otomodachi wrote:The current word-
"Response By Email (aHuman) (04/06/2014 08:00 PM)
Greetings!
I'm sorry that you feel this way about the game. I know that there are some issues presently with it, but they are hard at work fixing the issues that come up. I would give up yet!
For the refund policy for online games, usually after a certain amount of time, you are not able to refund it (virtual items/games/etc). I've had this happen a few times to me and I ended up having to keep a game that I did not want.
I will migrate this ticket to the folks going through refund requests. I can't guarantee they will be able to refund, but if they can, we'll process your refund for you.
Regards,
Person
The Elder Scrolls Online Team"
Hidden true advice?
Btw you can always get your money back
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-a-Credit-Card-Chargeback
Its called a charge back. Keep record of your emails if they say no you contact your bank ask for a charge back and forward the emails to them. Their denial of refund shows they are not willing to work with you.
Since A) you dont want the product because it was not what was advertised(free 30 days)You dont want store credit because you dont want the product.
eq2imora_ESO wrote: »If people just get their 100% refund, I think all will be happy. Zenimax just lost a chunk of customers.
There are legal rules for this scenario. Fine print isn’t supposed to contradict other statements in an ad or clear up false impressions the organization might leave. In other words, if the headline says 30 days free, the fine print can't pose stipulations - such as the registration of a credit card for a an initial test payment.
Also, disclosures should be “clear and conspicuous.” That means the important stuff is not supposed to be hidden in teeny tiny print.
Basically, no one can use the fine print as a "well, you should have known" argument. This is like the human centipad episode of South Park.
And I can't justify feeling sorry for people that didn't bother to read the agreement before clicking "I accept" just so they can play the game.
otomodachi wrote: »If people just get their 100% refund, I think all will be happy. Zenimax just lost a chunk of customers.
There are legal rules for this scenario. Fine print isn’t supposed to contradict other statements in an ad or clear up false impressions the organization might leave. In other words, if the headline says 30 days free, the fine print can't pose stipulations - such as the registration of a credit card for a an initial test payment.
Also, disclosures should be “clear and conspicuous.” That means the important stuff is not supposed to be hidden in teeny tiny print.
Basically, no one can use the fine print as a "well, you should have known" argument. This is like the human centipad episode of South Park.
No, Zenimax did not loose any customers, since what you are stating, clearly are not customers in the first place.
If you read the product you purchased, it clearly states what services are included and what costs will be applied.
Am I missing something here or are you only reading the text you like?
https://help.elderscrollsonline.com/app/storefaq
Yeah, the actual text.
"Once players purchase the game, they will have unlimited access for the first 30 days and can continue beyond that with a subscription of $14.99/30 days (€12.99 / £8.99). The first 30 days begin at or after the official launch of the game when players select their preferred subscription plan. Subscription fees will only be charged after the first 30 days."
Blam. They DON'T say anything about havingt to enter anything. You have to select a preferred sub plan, not SIGN UP for it.
And once again, that's all fine print that the sheep are posting. All the advertising just stated 30 days free play, which is contradicted in the fine print, because registering a CC for a trial payment is not free.
I really don't see how anyone can argue against this, unless they just can't comprehend what's going on. It's the principle of the matter, the deception of the advertising, and the problems it causes for game card users.
Doesn't have a CC, but has a lawyer willing to tackle a large and wealthy company? Heh.
ZOS is helping people get around the billing thing to access the free 30 days. Do some looking around to find the thread.
Doesn't have a CC, but has a lawyer willing to tackle a large and wealthy company? Heh.
ZOS is helping people get around the billing thing to access the free 30 days. Do some looking around to find the thread.
CC info stolen, waiting for new ones in the mail, but that's not the issue. Stop trolling.
Doesn't have a CC, but has a lawyer willing to tackle a large and wealthy company? Heh.
ZOS is helping people get around the billing thing to access the free 30 days. Do some looking around to find the thread.
CC info stolen, waiting for new ones in the mail, but that's not the issue. Stop trolling.
Observing something and finding it a little chuckleworthy isn't trolling. I also pointed out that there is a thread (right here: http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/67461/bank-account-being-charged/p1)) where ZOS tells you that they'll let you bypass having to enter billing info to begin your 30 days of free time.
Basically if you can't get your hands on a GTC, don't have a valid/usable CC or a paypal account, just contact them. Trolls aren't helpful, bro, and you can't say I didn't try to be.
omocho1b16_ESO wrote: »I love how some Americans think they can just sue everything.
You're just a bug to these guys. Yeah what they did is pretty unprofessional, annoying and all that but they -are- helping people around it. Even if they weren't, you can't do a damn thing. They would simply crush you in court and you'd go bankrupt trying to get your $92 back.
Considering it was stated right up front:
A persistent internet connection is required to play Elder Scrolls Online account and subscription are required to play.
Any lawyer who would not laugh at this got his degree from a Cracker Jack box I assure you.
It's not technical it's legal .. and just how do yuo propose they check for the REQUIRED VALID payment method without, you know, doing a VALIDATON check?otomodachi wrote: »Even if you wanna get technical, doesn't say anything about DOING anything with that valid pay method.
Yep no where does it say you are forced to sign up and be charged a full month of sub to add your CD key, it just says Choose a plan then you get free 30 days access
Once players purchase the game, they will have unlimited access for the first 30 days and can continue beyond that with a subscription of $14.99/30 days (€12.99 / £8.99). The first 30 days begin at or after the official launch of the game when players select their preferred subscription plan. Subscription fees will only be charged after the first 30 days.
Very misleading.
eq2imora_ESO wrote: »Yep no where does it say you are forced to sign up and be charged a full month of sub to add your CD key, it just says Choose a plan then you get free 30 days access
Once players purchase the game, they will have unlimited access for the first 30 days and can continue beyond that with a subscription of $14.99/30 days (€12.99 / £8.99). The first 30 days begin at or after the official launch of the game when players select their preferred subscription plan. Subscription fees will only be charged after the first 30 days.
Very misleading.
Nowhere is the word "free" in there.
Zenimax's utter disregard and silence to the fiasco they created is getting on my nerves.
The issue they created is textbook deceptive advertising, as evidenced by the countless numbers of people wondering why they don't have access to a game they were promised 30 days of free play for.
Is it time to get lawyers on the phone? I didn't have to spend much time researching to know mine would chomp at the bit. I just want my money back for the $92+ I spent, and am now unable to enjoy, since I don't have a CC to access the 30 days of "free play" we were promised.