GreasedLizard wrote: »They lifted lock on accounts now.
seangcxqb14_ESO wrote: »This is a joke. Any company with even basic IT competence can have sufficient capacity ready for a flood of users if they know exactly how many users it will be and when it will occur.
It's not like they didn't know exactly how many copies have been sold and how many of them have subscribed so far.
Not necessary, they may know the size of the user base but there may be many factors in play which may cause an influx at one giving point. Plus, why buy servers that will always have 40-50% capacity space which is not used, when you can let it reach the capacity and then increase to your requirements (thus saving money). There will be a lot of variables at play which make it difficult to forecast.
That is outdated thinking. We no longer have to actually buy servers when we want temporary additional resources - there is a reason cloud computing is so popular.
kelticfuryub17_ESO wrote: »This is a self manufactured issue. Why on earth wouldn't they use the same info that was input for purchasing the digital editions? Extremely backwards planning. If you can even call it planning.
kelticfuryub17_ESO wrote: »This is a self manufactured issue. Why on earth wouldn't they use the same info that was input for purchasing the digital editions? Extremely backwards planning. If you can even call it planning.
Based on what evidence?