In hindsight, someone who had been playing for less than a year being this interested in crown gifting should itself have been a red flag for people on the forum. "I want to buy cash shop items for other people" seems to be a strange priority for someone this new to the game.
"I want to buy cash shop items for other people" seems to be a strange priority for someone this new to the game.
I did wonder how it was possible for a player to achieve as much in ESO as they'd claimed to have done, within the timeframe they'd given. Thank you for letting us know the outcome of your investigation.
Upon reevaluation of the account, we could tell the user was an active ESO player, but still had concerning markers on their account. We weighed the pros and cons of those risks and ultimately granted access to gifting. Unfortunately, within 24 hours, we were able to confirm new fraudulent behavior made by the user. They have now been permanently banned in-game and from the forum.
Caius Drusus Imperial DK (DC) Bragg Ironhand Orc Temp (DC) Neesha Stalks-Shadows Argonian NB (EP) Falidir Altmer Sorcr (AD) J'zharka Khajiit NB (AD) |
Isabeau Runeseer Breton Sorc (DC) Fevassa Dunmer DK (EP) Manut Redguard Temp (AD) Tylera the Summoner Altmer Sorc (EP) Svari Snake-Blood Nord DK (AD) |
Ashlyn D'Elyse Breton NB (EP) Filindria Bosmer Temp (DC) Vigbjorn the Wanderer Nord Warden (EP) Hrokki Winterborn Breton Warden (DC) Basks-in-the-Sunshine Argonian Temp |
We highlight this because a common tactic bad actors use is the power of public forums here and elsewhere: taking advantage of the everyday player’s goodwill to garner public support to be let back in. Based on this situation, future threads like this will be based only on the follow-up investigation and closed once the investigation is complete.
SilverBride wrote: »
it feels like they're looking at 1) achievements 2) the number of messages in the group and guild 3) the activity of all characters 4) the activity on the forum 5) how much real money was spent on purchasing boxes 6) whether a subscription was purchased 7) whether there are any violations 8) whether you have criticized their company or not .
there may be a number of other factors. and their program shows all of this. Because they responded to me with Kevin, "You don't even have the minimum requirements."
That is, it's not a human looks and analyzes. It's a curve program that looks at the fulfillment of requirements.
And as we know, they introduced this feature to remove scammers. And I agree that it was necessary. However, ordinary players are suffering
In hindsight, someone who had been playing for less than a year being this interested in crown gifting should itself have been a red flag for people on the forum. "I want to buy cash shop items for other people" seems to be a strange priority for someone this new to the game.
Someone might just as well be playing together with a friend or their partner and want to give them a gift. After all, a year of playing any game is quite a lot of time.
Dagoth_Rac wrote: »In hindsight, someone who had been playing for less than a year being this interested in crown gifting should itself have been a red flag for people on the forum. "I want to buy cash shop items for other people" seems to be a strange priority for someone this new to the game.
Someone might just as well be playing together with a friend or their partner and want to give them a gift. After all, a year of playing any game is quite a lot of time.
They started six months ago, had taken extended breaks and only had steady play in March and April. And they somehow had like every hard mode veteran Trial achievement in the game. That does not happen organically. You don't just stumble out of the starter island and into an Immortal Redeemer group. OP was almost certainly paying for carries. Or a ringer account getting paid to carry others.
Paying in-game gold for assistance with difficult content is not against TOS. But when your only in-game activity seems to be rapidly accumulating high difficulty achievements that are typically way over the head of a new player, that is like a rapid fire ballista that shoots red flags.
Wait what even is a bad actor? Is it like a scammer? I don't understand how people buying cosmetic gifts for others is a harmful thing, nor why bad actors would be eager to get gifting permission in the first place.
Wait what even is a bad actor? Is it like a scammer? I don't understand how people buying cosmetic gifts for others is a harmful thing, nor why bad actors would be eager to get gifting permission in the first place.
Wait what even is a bad actor? Is it like a scammer? I don't understand how people buying cosmetic gifts for others is a harmful thing, nor why bad actors would be eager to get gifting permission in the first place.
Money laundering. They buy crowns using credit cards from purchased lists or opened using identity theft and then sell those crowns on shady sites for real money. Or, they sell the crowns to gullible players willing to believe those below-market-rate crowns they saw advertised in zone chat were totally legit. Like, totally. And then they sell the resulting gold for real money. End result is cash that can be hard to trace to the stolen cards. If you buy crowns for gold, only buy from people you trust.
Hi everyone. Our Anti-Fraud team made up of Devs, Customer Service, and Community team members wanted to follow up here after monitoring this thread and engaging with the original poster of the thread. We believe it’s important to go over this case, because it’s a good example of a bad actor and the tactics they use to circumvent safety processes to do harm.
First, we want to acknowledge that while the gifting process can be frustrating, it is designed to keep both you, the player, and us safe from bad actors.
When the user originally placed their ticket in for gifting access, we denied their request due to account markers that showed future signs of potential fraudulent behavior. However, the user then opened this thread noting their playtime and claim to eligibility. In addition to their claims, we heard from many of you. We understand the frustration with the process and empathize with it. Many of you know that we often go through threads like this and try to assist where we can with the support of our customer service team.
Upon reevaluation of the account, we could tell the user was an active ESO player, but still had concerning markers on their account. We weighed the pros and cons of those risks and ultimately granted access to gifting. Unfortunately, within 24 hours, we were able to confirm new fraudulent behavior made by the user. They have now been permanently banned in-game and from the forum.
We highlight this because a common tactic bad actors use is the power of public forums here and elsewhere: taking advantage of the everyday player’s goodwill to garner public support to be let back in. Based on this situation, future threads like this will be based only on the follow-up investigation and closed once the investigation is complete.
To close out this post, we are still working to get as many people in as possible to the gifting program. We relaxed rules for gifting earlier this year and will continue to monitor these rules. Our goal is to stop bad actors, while keeping everyone else safe. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to read this follow up.
CoolBlast3 wrote: »Classic gamer moment. Thanks for showing the receipts ZOS
DeadlySerious wrote: »CoolBlast3 wrote: »Classic gamer moment. Thanks for showing the receipts ZOS
What receipts?
Kevin posted a statement, but there are no receipts or proof. Just Kevins statement which says essentially the same thing the automated denials say but more eloquently, that's all.
I know of far too many unearned and undeserved bans to have any faith in ZOS' AI assisted automated banning systems. The company making PR statements supporting those systems does nothing to improve the accuracy of those systems.