You can use mouse or keyboard macros on pc to keep you logged in having you cast an buff every second minute.I would assume that they took turns taking breaks to ensure that they didn't lose the instance.
After finishing my duo run this week, I checked the leaderboard:
1. xxx 46.?.?
2. xxx 46.?.?
...
Congratulations on the pair, BUT
Anyone might have any idea on how that could be possible?
or
Any imaginations on what might be in arc46?
Personofsecrets wrote: »Reginald_leBlem wrote: »AFAIK there's nothing stopping one person from logging off, another person joining, play for a while, then 1 person logs off, another joining, etc.
Would account for lower visions but I would not want to be the person on arc 40 with 0 visions
If that is true, then maybe an alt account could be used to pickup bad visions, open up the portal to the next round, and then immediately leave. Wouldn't something like this mess with or make impossible the leaderboard placement?
Cheesy af strategy of reduce enemy weapon damage to zero, ulti build to have magma shell on spam, nothing can kill you and you just kill things.
Cheesy af strategy of reduce enemy weapon damage to zero, ulti build to have magma shell on spam, nothing can kill you and you just kill things.
I think they were just doing the perma-magma. Weakening/cowardice is the high-arc strategy for non-DKs, while perma-magma is the strategy for DKs.
From the video, you can see that they have just one AoE scribing skill, trample, which I assume has the heroism affix, and since the only way for a non-NB to apply AoE cowardice is via scribing, this means that they don't have a way to apply AoE major cowardice. But that's perfectly reasonable since there's no need for that if you have magma spam.
As for the discrepancies in the vision and verse numbers, I assume that's a problem on ZOS's end, as IA was never designed to be run to such a high arc (e.g., I know in the past there have been problems with IA breaking when it runs out of visions to give). Their score appears on the leaderboard, and there's no way to fake that.
Outside of trials, that's most ESO metas in a nutshell. Even then, the whole gear/ability swap pre-buff/ae thing is pretty cheesy imo.Cheesy af strategy
This is why I'm afraid ZOS views IA as their ultimate extensible arena that they will continue to iterate, for at least a while, instead of offering a new arena.Gettting a high IA score isn't particularly remarkable.
Having the time and patience to get a high score in IA is remarkable.
Having the time and patience to regularly get high scores is just a little bit pointless in the general scheme of things.
Personofsecrets wrote: »Cheesy af strategy of reduce enemy weapon damage to zero, ulti build to have magma shell on spam, nothing can kill you and you just kill things.
I think they were just doing the perma-magma. Weakening/cowardice is the high-arc strategy for non-DKs, while perma-magma is the strategy for DKs.
From the video, you can see that they have just one AoE scribing skill, trample, which I assume has the heroism affix, and since the only way for a non-NB to apply AoE cowardice is via scribing, this means that they don't have a way to apply AoE major cowardice. But that's perfectly reasonable since there's no need for that if you have magma spam.
As for the discrepancies in the vision and verse numbers, I assume that's a problem on ZOS's end, as IA was never designed to be run to such a high arc (e.g., I know in the past there have been problems with IA breaking when it runs out of visions to give). Their score appears on the leaderboard, and there's no way to fake that.
Is there any information on how they may be overcoming the Adaptive Conqueror Vision? The video shows them getting Magma Shell up at around 141 ultimate. That's what about what I would expect when getting cost reduction from Imperial (6%), Boundless Potential (10%), and Blessing of the Potentates (15%). Adaptive Conqueror would lead to a higher ultimate cost.
Personofsecrets wrote: »Cheesy af strategy of reduce enemy weapon damage to zero, ulti build to have magma shell on spam, nothing can kill you and you just kill things.
I think they were just doing the perma-magma. Weakening/cowardice is the high-arc strategy for non-DKs, while perma-magma is the strategy for DKs.
From the video, you can see that they have just one AoE scribing skill, trample, which I assume has the heroism affix, and since the only way for a non-NB to apply AoE cowardice is via scribing, this means that they don't have a way to apply AoE major cowardice. But that's perfectly reasonable since there's no need for that if you have magma spam.
As for the discrepancies in the vision and verse numbers, I assume that's a problem on ZOS's end, as IA was never designed to be run to such a high arc (e.g., I know in the past there have been problems with IA breaking when it runs out of visions to give). Their score appears on the leaderboard, and there's no way to fake that.
Is there any information on how they may be overcoming the Adaptive Conqueror Vision? The video shows them getting Magma Shell up at around 141 ultimate. That's what about what I would expect when getting cost reduction from Imperial (6%), Boundless Potential (10%), and Blessing of the Potentates (15%). Adaptive Conqueror would lead to a higher ultimate cost.
I don't know. Maybe they just didn't take it?
Porting out and back in can let you skip the vision selection if it came down to that.