No, shields aren't heals. Shields are preloaded mitigation that can be used both proactively and reactively. That's massively powerful and massively different from what things like Coag Blood or Healthy Offering do. The intended balance was that shields can preload but thus recover worse, while burst heals can't preload but they recover much better.But a 14-16k "heal" is not out of line and I think rather balanced
1) block-shielding is surprisingly effective at dealing with incoming damage that exceeds your shield size while you have unblockable damage sources on you like dot stacks, you should try it sometimeYou're ignoring that they don't benefit from block mitigation and that they expire. You're also ignoring that they are the WORST scaling form of defense in a 1vX scenario... Just look at the versatility and synergy Arcanist shields have
xylena_lazarow wrote: »Completely remove the heal, full duration 15k shields that activate relevant passives are fine on their own. Staple a double bar major crit chance buff to a core class skill like Crystal or whatever, like what they did with NB cloak (lol). Now Sorcs have a free bar slot to put a burst heal like Vibrant Shroud, or start stacking Resto Healing Ward again (a properly balanced healy shield), or slot a HoT skill like Vigor, and so on. Their power ceiling wouldn't really drop all that much, but the proactive and reactive components of their kit would be better in line with the rest of the game.Insightful, but what are your thoughts and recommended change? Truly, I am interested in this conversation... In essence Sorc is relying on the ability to remain vigilant in spamming its shield. The thought of it is to be proactive vs reactive towards the dmg.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »No, shields aren't heals. Shields are preloaded mitigation that can be used both proactively and reactively. That's massively powerful and massively different from what things like Coag Blood or Healthy Offering do. The intended balance was that shields can preload but thus recover worse, while burst heals can't preload but they recover much better.But a 14-16k "heal" is not out of line and I think rather balanced
Ward both preloads and recovers. Proactive and reactive in a single bar slot, spammable, unconditional. No drawback.
StaticWave wrote: »Galeriano2 wrote: »xylena_lazarow wrote: »Do you want my ESO resume or something? If this were a real game I'd post my ELO here.Galeriano2 wrote: »Here is a question. If that sorc according to Your claims was experienced and he had such an OP defensive ability in his kit than why You were able to push him so heavily into defense that as You Yourself said quote "The sorc was on his back foot the entire time with low chance to win"?
Broken doesn't mean unbeatable. Ward gives Sorc an egregious healing kit advantage, but it can still be outplayed.
How about this. We leave Ward as is, and bring back pre-nerf Shield Breaker with the Oblivion damage. We're also gonna bring back Oblivion enchants proccing off full penetration flat scaling MDW bleed ticks. Deal? Dark Deal?
I just asked a simple question which.
If ward gives sorc egregious healing kit adventage than why You were able to keep better defense and offense while using Your defensive abilities less?
Thing with bringing back pre nerf shieldbreaker and other mentioned things is that You would also have to bring some of the pre nerf sorc features that pushed devs to releasing shieldbreaker and at that point I dont think healing on hardened ward would be the biggest issue.
This shield version is stronger than any previous shield version because of the burst heal. Shield breaker wouldnt do anything.
StaticWave wrote: »Galeriano2 wrote: »xylena_lazarow wrote: »My Arc had to use Impervious Ward, Vigor, and Blood Craze to stay healed. 3 buttons.Galeriano2 wrote: »CMX You posted and commentary to it actually suggest that magsorc is not that great.
The Sorc only had to use Hardened Ward, and did it against higher incoming damage. These Sorcs I'm fighting aren't using dots so they're not getting any Surge procs when they go defensive, it's all Ward spam. 1 button.
Hardened Ward is stronger than Impervious Ward, Vigor, and a standard HoT combined.
Remember when people were crying for Impervious nerfs?
And? Was sorc You using ward outside of GCD?
The thing with one button argument is that it's not looking at the bigger picture like rest of the toolkit. Ward doesn't seem to be stronger than Imprevious ward, vigor and standard HoT combined if You were able to push that sorc heavily into ward spam while maintaining Your defense only periodically. It looks like You with using Your defenses only once in a while which allowed You to spend more time on dealing damage had better defense than sorc that was spamming ward for majority of a fight.
Here is a question. If that sorc according to Your claims was experienced and he had such an OP defensive ability in his kit than why You were able to push him so heavily into defense that as You Yourself said quote "The sorc was on his back foot the entire time with low chance to win"?
Okay now remove Vigor and standard HoT on that Arcanist, and let's see whether Impervious Ward or Hardened Ward are stronger?
Also, I tanked 8k DPS with Surge, Vigor, and Ward. Arcanist can maybe do it sure, but it definitely doesn't have Sorc damage. So which is worse? An Arcanist that's super tanky but has no damage unless in 3 procs, or a Sorc that's also super tanky but actually has damage without procs, and even more damage with procs. Pick your poison, and I hope you pick the obvious one.
Blocking doesn't preload mitigation. You can only heal up after the fact. You can't hit full damage while holding block because you're not attack weaving. You can't move at full speed. Investing in block mitigation has high opportunity cost, unless you're slotting Bound Aegis... which of all the insane things about shield sorcs right now might somehow be the craziest that they even get easy access to block mitigation. I also addressed block-shielding in #454 above if that was a doubt.Turtle_Bot wrote: »This argument went out the window when block mitigation was allowed to be utilized at insane values alongside burst heals
StaticWave wrote: »Galeriano2 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »Galeriano2 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »Galeriano2 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »Here are 2 more examples of Hardened Ward being absolutely broken even with lower max mag. I got my friend to hop on Warden and DK in a full pressure build. I was in Malubeth/Rally/Wretched/SSC with 35.6k HP and VAMP 2. Here are the results of the DPS test:
Warden DPS and my healing:
DK DPS and my healing:
In both tests, Hardened Ward scaled with max HP instead, and at 35.6k HP and VAMP 2, I was able to tank up to 8.4k DPS for a sustained 2 minute fight. Keep in mind, this is just with Ward, Vigor, and Surge. I wasn't weaving Blood Magic healing, dodge rolling, or using Streak.
So as I've stated earlier in this thread, pressure builds CANNOT kill a Sorc anymore. The only chance of killing a Sorc is with perfectly timed burst to 100-0 them. You cannot do that vs a good player. If the counter play is so difficult to pull off, then is it really counter play?
Those are still pure duels and the thing is magsorc was capable to survive lots of pressure in a staged duel even before U41. Ward change didn't suddenly turn magsorc overnight from dying to a sneeze to surviving 7k DPS. Screenshots above show that sorc just joined the club of setups being able to completly turtle up in bergama. That alone doesn't make it top PvP class for U41 and doesn't prove it is top PvP class.
No matter how many duel screenshots You will provide it really won't matter in determining wheter magsorc is or isn't as strong as You suggest in entirety of PvP.
And if you think any class other than Sorc in a full damage build can sit and face tank a DK with Zaan, mDW, Vate, without cleansing anything, and not break a sweat, then you are deeply in denial.
Why don’t you prove that to me if you want to defend this ability so much? If you’re on PC NA, please pick a time, go to stormhaven on other classes in a full dmg build, and tank 8.4k dps for me. I’ll have all my friends duel you.StaticWave wrote: »Galeriano2 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »Here are 2 more examples of Hardened Ward being absolutely broken even with lower max mag. I got my friend to hop on Warden and DK in a full pressure build. I was in Malubeth/Rally/Wretched/SSC with 35.6k HP and VAMP 2. Here are the results of the DPS test:
Warden DPS and my healing:
DK DPS and my healing:
In both tests, Hardened Ward scaled with max HP instead, and at 35.6k HP and VAMP 2, I was able to tank up to 8.4k DPS for a sustained 2 minute fight. Keep in mind, this is just with Ward, Vigor, and Surge. I wasn't weaving Blood Magic healing, dodge rolling, or using Streak.
So as I've stated earlier in this thread, pressure builds CANNOT kill a Sorc anymore. The only chance of killing a Sorc is with perfectly timed burst to 100-0 them. You cannot do that vs a good player. If the counter play is so difficult to pull off, then is it really counter play?
Those are still pure duels and the thing is magsorc was capable to survive lots of pressure in a staged duel even before U41. Ward change didn't suddenly turn magsorc overnight from dying to a sneeze to surviving 7k DPS. Screenshots above show that sorc just joined the club of setups being able to completly turtle up in bergama. That alone doesn't make it top PvP class for U41 and doesn't prove it is top PvP class.
No matter how many duel screenshots You will provide it really won't matter in determining wheter magsorc is or isn't as strong as You suggest in entirety of PvP.
No magsorc or any class could survive 8k dps last patch in a full dmg build. I duel and test DPS more than anyone here so you can’t fool me with lies lol.
We literally have a dueling guild that host dueling tournaments in no rules and nobody there could tank 8k dps in a full dmg build either.
So you can accept that Sorc is currently overperforming, or you can deny it and the class stays broken for several patches. It doesnt hurt me at all. I only benefit from this, but i’m still trying to be objective.
First of all what is a full damage build, because wearing malubeth and saying about full dmg build sounds wierd to me. Could I make 50k HP warden with malubeth, rallying cry and high resistances and claim I am running in full dmg build? Because if yes than surviving 8k DPS wouldn't be an issue in a "full dmg build".
Second thing is we don't know how these duels linked by You were actually looking. 8k DPS means nothing without context. Like I don't know wheter enemies were just parsing You like a dummy without burst windows combined with stuns, interrupts and trying to weaken Your sustain and defense from ice staff HA or were they actually trying. Pure 8k DPS claim doesn't say much.
Thirdly it's getting tiresome to continously point out that You are putting words into my mouth that I didn't said. I am not defending a hardened ward neither I am saying that magsorc is or isn't broken atm. All I am saying that I still havn't seen a magsorcs overtaking PvP and demolishing everyone which should happen if I was to completly belive this thread.
I appreciate that You have so much faith in me to say quote "you can accept that Sorc is currently overperforming, or you can deny it and the class stays broken for several patches" but I really don't think devs are relying on my opinions so much to balance the game purely around them. Sometimes most objective thing to do is to wait and see how things develop instead of relying on subjective thought of being objective.
We will not see any changes until U42 anyway due to ZoS's policy of dealing with combat changes so waiting is only thing we have and all the passion that was put into this thread would be way better spent at the end of U41 when all the opinions would be more clear and easier to prove which would also make them potentially more impactfull.
30k stam, 110% crit dmg, Major Berserk, 16k pen, 6k weapon dmg, 40% crit chance, and Essence thief. Good enough of a full dmg build for u?
A DK with Zaan/mDW/Vate parsing and CCing me off cooldown means nothing? Do you understand how high 8k DPS is? It’s hard to explain to you when you don’t look at CMX lol.
That is not the answer to my question.
I perfectly understand how high 8k DPS is in PvP. I also perfectly understand how big differene there is between 8k DPS made by person who is actively trying to kill You and a person who is just parsing You like a dummy and cmx alone is not saying much about which type of fight it was.
You clearly don't understand how high 8k DPS is in PvP if you say that lol. Parsing someone with CC off cooldown is actively trying to kill you. I don't care how you define it.
In a typical fight where 2 players are trading, a high DPS fight is usually around 4k-5k DPS, with 5k DPS being on the really high end. In the same build, that player can reach 6-7k DPS if he's not being attacked.
The point is, it doesn't matter lol. If you can't survive 5k DPS, then you can't survive 6-7k DPS.
Can you show CMX of another class damage build doing this so we can compare it to Sorc?Galeriano2 wrote: »I do understand what 8k DPS means. It seems though that You don't understand that every class properly geared can survive 8k DPS when turtling up, focusing purely on defense for entirety of a duel while being parsed like a dummy.
StaticWave wrote: »Also, isn't it funny how even when you provide multiple screenshots of CMX to show the tanking capability of Ward, videos showing why Ward is overperforming, videos of well-known and strong Sorc mains who think the skill overperforms, and some people still go through mental gymnastics to come up with arguments to defend the skill, like:
1) "We need more data" - while data is plentiful and have been provided multiple times
2) "Other classes can do it too" - completely ignoring the massive GCD and damage stacking advantage on Sorc vs other classes
3) "I haven't seen that many sorcs" - totally anecdotal and has no meaningful substance. I don't see that many NBs either, but that doesn't mean they don't exist
4) "Duels don't count" - meanwhile most of the complaints about other classes are in fact also talking about 1v1s, but somehow Sorc gets a free pass lmao
5) "I still kill plenty of sorcs" - Bad players die regardless of class, and is a non factor in an argument about balance
6) "We need more time to see if Sorc does dominate" - go back to point #3.
It's either OP or it isn't. Anything in the middle is mental gymnastics and aren't valid arguments for combat balance.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »Can you show CMX of another class damage build doing this so we can compare it to Sorc?Galeriano2 wrote: »I do understand what 8k DPS means. It seems though that You don't understand that every class properly geared can survive 8k DPS when turtling up, focusing purely on defense for entirety of a duel while being parsed like a dummy.
@StaticWave
So I talked to Felon about these duels, he said the ones you listed were straight DPS parses and not a real fight so I don't think there is anything TOO insane there, going full defensive in a fight isn't an issue. Also id like to clarify this was done with a ward scaling off of 36k~ health like you said... Which is not a strong ward, I wish you would have listed the values for the ward but with the heal being 3-5k (with really high crit healing AND major vitality) and I imagine a 9.5k ward with major Vitality (from monster set) maybe that's a 10.5k ward (you can confirm or I can mimic it to see).
But a 14-16k "heal" is not out of line and I think rather balanced... Its when it's reaching 20k for one button that it's a problem.
So what's this trying to prove? 36k health gives a lot of room for error and buffer time to heal. And ward at those numbers isn't out of line. Vigor and crit surge was 30% of your healing so it couldn't be done without those.
At the end of the day I'm not saying ward is balanced (at the upper ranges) because it isn't. But what you showed is not an overperforming ward at all. Felon also said you had duels where it was a real fight, you were putting up 3.5k~ DPS to his 7.5k~ at the time. He said you guys stalemated. Assuming you were using the same setup as above you'd have had blood magic, crit surge, vigor, malubeth, and a mediocre version of ward. So far from "just using ward" and not an accurate representation of what ward is able to absorb.
I'm not involved in the dueling community so I'm not going to pretend I know every stat about it. But the test you put up is no different than U40 Ward (about 15k ward size versus 11k + 4k heal) and seems like an exaggeration of what ward is actually doing.
Galeriano2 wrote: »xylena_lazarow wrote: »Can you show CMX of another class damage build doing this so we can compare it to Sorc?Galeriano2 wrote: »I do understand what 8k DPS means. It seems though that You don't understand that every class properly geared can survive 8k DPS when turtling up, focusing purely on defense for entirety of a duel while being parsed like a dummy.
As long as You will be up to making 8k DPS duelling setup on PTS that stays in meele and parses enemy like a dummy I am up to making a setup with malubeth, SSC and rallying cry that will be able to withstand it on any class
I must have missed something. Malubeth? The hell? You can just give us a Superstar or UESP summary.Galeriano2 wrote: »As long as You will be up to making 8k DPS duelling setup on PTS that stays in meele and parses enemy like a dummy I am up to making a setup with malubeth, SSC and rallying cry that will be able to withstand it on any class
xylena_lazarow wrote: »I must have missed something. Malubeth? The hell? You can just give us a Superstar or UESP summary.Galeriano2 wrote: »As long as You will be up to making 8k DPS duelling setup on PTS that stays in meele and parses enemy like a dummy I am up to making a setup with malubeth, SSC and rallying cry that will be able to withstand it on any class
The two case studies I gave were non-staged open world 1v1s against the standard Chudan/Alfiq/Rally damage build.
I'm fine throwing any tank set data in the trash, but you keep complaining about "staged duels" and sarcasitcally disregarding my wild duel case studies, so I'm really not sure what you're looking for. You also have not provided any of your own data to support your arguments, despite emphasizing the importance of collecting more data before acting on Ward.Galeriano2 wrote: »Discussion about 8k DPS was not about Your "two case studies" but static's duels where he survived 8k DPS and he was using malubeth in that duels.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »I'm fine throwing any tank set data in the trash, but you keep complaining about "staged duels" and sarcasitcally disregarding my wild duel case studies, so I'm really not sure what you're looking for. You also have not provided any of your own data to support your arguments, despite emphasizing the importance of collecting more data before acting on Ward.Galeriano2 wrote: »Discussion about 8k DPS was not about Your "two case studies" but static's duels where he survived 8k DPS and he was using malubeth in that duels.
Please show CMX of a non-Sorc damage build tanking 5k+ dps in a duel using only 1 healing skill.Galeriano2 wrote: »What arguments of mine would You like me to prove? Please be specific.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »Please show CMX of a non-Sorc damage build tanking 5k+ dps in a duel using only 1 healing skill.Galeriano2 wrote: »What arguments of mine would You like me to prove? Please be specific.
You claim that any other class can do what Sorc is doing defensively, i.e. tanking a high damage opponent doing 5k+ dps in a 1v1 with only 1 healing skill, on a damage build with two 5pc offensive sets such as Alfiq/Rallying, no tank sets, 30k hp or lower. Please show evidence of this in CMX with opposing dps and your hps.Galeriano2 wrote: »What arguments of mine would You like me to prove? Please be specific.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »You claim that any other class can do what Sorc is doing defensively, i.e. tanking a high damage opponent doing 5k+ dps in a 1v1 with only 1 healing skill, on a damage build with two 5pc offensive sets such as Alfiq/Rallying, no tank sets, 30k hp or lower. Please show evidence of this in CMX with opposing dps and your hps.Galeriano2 wrote: »What arguments of mine would You like me to prove? Please be specific.
Static and I have both given plenty of data. You ask for data, but it seems you have no data, only rhetoric.
This isn't the gotcha you think it is in a game without proper publicly available data, you're basically just calling me a liar and moving the goalposts. I went over why Surge wasn't a factor, and they were both using Bound Aegis not Vigor. You asked me to state my demand clearly, so I did, now it's your turn. State your claim concisely, back it up with CMX.Galeriano2 wrote: »I never made that claim. I would reccomend You to read what I wrote more carefully. And if we want to be precise You never proved that sorc can do this either because Your case studies were not containing cmx of sorc's side of the story so we don't know for example how much healing he recived from surge or if he had vigor or not. You ask others to provide prove to claims they never made when You can't even fully support Your own claims.