spartaxoxo wrote: »Real tank > fake with a taunt > fake without a taunt (I vote to kick this last one).
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »if someone has a taunt, and are holding a bosses aggro, they're a tank. If someones healing the group in some way, they're a healer. The whole "is it or isn't it a fake" debate is daft as heck.
This. Cut the newbies and casuals some slack, guys. Not everyone spends every waking moment on the forums or other sites trying to squeeze that extra .01% of spell resistance in, and unless you’re trying to no-death the thing - in which case you shouldn’t be running in a PuG - odds are good it doesn’t matter that much.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Real tank > fake with a taunt > fake without a taunt (I vote to kick this last one).
It's a FACT that you can do all normal dungeons faster with a fake tank that slots taunt and self sustain. Why would you rather waste time with one less person doing damage?
JimFord047 wrote: »I Play in the majority as a healer, some can do a little damage, All are TANKS! DPS is not really for me these days, way to many buttons to push!
if a fake tank comes in , its now the norm on non vet dungeons, then I just switch Bars and do the job myself , it honestly does not make a difference to me, sometimes its actually quite fun!
But on Vet / Trails , I do think a fake tank is more of a liability than a help
ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »For the sake of this poll, a real tank holds high threat aggro, stacks enemies, buffs the group (likely none of these things at an end-game level, but makes an effort), but does minimal damage . A fake tank does decent damage for a group finder pug, may or may not have a taunt slotted, and provides no other support typical of a tank.
For a random normal dungeon (standard chance of being base game or DLC) would you rather have:
Lady_Galadhiel wrote: »I love fake tanks because they ,in most cases, do more dmg than the dd's.