Gadamlub14_ESO wrote: »I miss the days when Bethesda was laughed out of the room for 5$ horse armour.
A_Cats_Tail wrote: »Why are people so emotionally invested in useless cosmetics? Who cares if they lock some polymorph behind even $1,000 - it has absolutely no impact on the gameplay itself. The bug hindering crates from being gifted is undoubtedly problematic but people calling a cosmetic locked behind $$ predatory is laughable
The problem isn't so much that it's a high price for a polymorph but that it's a high price for a polymorph that was widely popular. If this decision is unrelated to the polymorph's popularity, then that's one thing, but if it's in conjunction with the popularity that's something else.
SkaraMinoc wrote: »As far as pricing goes, keep in mind that demand for crown crates is driving this decision.
A_Cats_Tail wrote: »
Realistically speaking they can charge whatever amount they deem fit for the polymorph especially if it's in high demand. If anything, what's questionable is the amount of people willing to spend $60-$75 for a cosmetic in the first place. If there wasn't a demand then ZOS wouldn't be charging the amount that they are . Some people just lack the self restraint when it comes to "extravagant" spending
KENDALLPOP wrote: »
Locking a highly anticipated polymorph behind a large crown crate purchase is the absolute worst sort of FOMO marketing and you won't get good feedback from it.
As React mentioned above, weird how gifting ONLY crates is broke for these new crates...??? Nothing else is broke but crates? Suuuuuuure....
thegreatme wrote: »
Trying to say that sort of bug is a secret conspiracy by ZoS to push crate sales is absolutely stupid.
The people who can't/won't buy crates with real world money and get crates by paying other players with gold are likely STILL not going to buy crates with their own money, which HURTS ZoS's profit margin, not helps it. Gifted crates still make ZoS just as much (or more) money than otherwise.
I don't agree with a lot of things ZoS says/does as a company, but lets be fair here. There's literally no financial gain for ZoS by blocking crate gifting and "pretending its a bug". There's a lot of financial gain for ZoS to have/allow crate gifting because the people selling crates to other people for gold are still sending money to ZoS. Gifted crates aren't free, someone still has to pay for them.
The fact people want to say ZoS would intentionally gut their own sales potential to market to people who don't spend their own money on crates anyway and won't EVER spend their own money on crates is entirely ludicrous lol
Kevin seems to be pretty adamant that it is a bug. I'll take him at his word even though I have no reason historically to believe a single statement from zenimax. However..
You are totally incorrect about there being no financial gain possible from this. There are millions of crowns in circulation that were purchased with Argentinian and Venezuelan dollars, for literal pennies compared to the U.S pricing before they were adjusted, and those cannot be used to gift this crown bundle due to this bug.
SkaraMinoc wrote: »
Deceptively introducing a bug to try and generate additional revenue in a very limited timeframe and then lying to players about it doesn't make sense. The liability and ethics would be a huge red flag and bubble up to senior leadership which would never greenlight something like this. Not to mention the math doesn't add up since hundreds of players want to buy and sell crowns this week at regular prices and are unable to do so. ZOS is losing money right now due to this bug.
Also, millions of crowns isn't exactly that much. The top whales purchase over 1 million crowns for around $5k USD once or twice a year. Then they'll sell that for gold or stock up on crown crates to buy all the Radiant Apex mounts.
In the official article, it says "we’re also introducing a new 25-crate bundle as a one-time purchase ". So I'm assuming you can only buy the 25 pack once.
~
This. And this is what I disliked about ESO monetization so much, the "let's see how much you want this shiny" approach. Coupled with poor game quality in certain areas and poor communication, this just motivates me to spend money and time elsewhere.They'll just continue to shift the base line of acceptable monetization until the servers shut down.
FluffyBird wrote: »This. And this is what I disliked about ESO monetization so much, the "let's see how much you want this shiny" approach. Coupled with poor game quality in certain areas and poor communication, this just motivates me to spend money and time elsewhere.
The most anticipated cosmetic locked behind a massive price tag? That's ZOS in a nutshell 😂
Could have at least given us "a chance" to unlock it:
25 crates bundle - 100% chance
15 crates bundle - 35% chance
4 crates bundle - 5% chance
1 crate bundle - 1% chance
James-Wayne wrote: »If this new crown crate is going to go the way I think it is they deserve all the hate they are about to get....
thankfully Starfield is out this year so I can go clear my head of all these greedy tactics they have been introducing into the game of late, its wrecking the game.
SkaraMinoc wrote: »Way too many conspiracy theories in this thread regarding the gifting bug.
As far as pricing goes, keep in mind that demand for crown crates is driving this decision.I do empathize with players that only want the cosmetic and don't want anything from the crates.
- For many players, this is a free cosmetic as part of 25 crates they will already buy.
- For some players, the addition of a cosmetic is enough motivation to buy 25 crates instead of 15. It's a "step up" option. The value here is determined by the cost of 10 extra crates + cosmetic.
- For some players, the cosmetic is what they primarily want but they also want a few things from the crates.
James-Wayne wrote: »If this new crown crate is going to go the way I think it is they deserve all the hate they are about to get....
thankfully Starfield is out this year so I can go clear my head of all these greedy tactics they have been introducing into the game of late, its wrecking the game.