just to place it here
just to place it here
Yes, that's another example like the Razum Dar one, in that with both you have the option to tell the truth or lie, and in each case both options progress the exchange satisfactorily so there's no requirement to lie. This one would have been made more interesting if you had a third option to say "Actually I was planning on using the room to store my Daedric memorabilia, is that a problem?"
just to place it here
Yes, that's another example like the Razum Dar one, in that with both you have the option to tell the truth or lie, and in each case both options progress the exchange satisfactorily so there's no requirement to lie. This one would have been made more interesting if you had a third option to say "Actually I was planning on using the room to store my Daedric memorabilia, is that a problem?"
You have the option to pick an option that does not have "[Lie]" in front if it. That is not the same as the option to tell the truth or lie. It could be that both of those options are lies, in which case there is no provision for actually telling the truth.
just to place it here
Yes, that's another example like the Razum Dar one, in that with both you have the option to tell the truth or lie, and in each case both options progress the exchange satisfactorily so there's no requirement to lie. This one would have been made more interesting if you had a third option to say "Actually I was planning on using the room to store my Daedric memorabilia, is that a problem?"
You have the option to pick an option that does not have "[Lie]" in front if it. That is not the same as the option to tell the truth or lie. It could be that both of those options are lies, in which case there is no provision for actually telling the truth.
Given that the comment is the same in each case, I take it as meaning that you are lying if you pick the one marked "Lie" and telling the truth if you pick the one that isn't marked "Lie". No other interpretation makes sense in my view.
If he's referring to the initial encounter then the OP's claim is simply untrue. I just took a fresh character to Razum Dar and tested it. Twice I kept to the truth in the opening dialogue and Razum Dar simply advised me to fit in with the locals, while progressing the quest.
You have the option to pick an option that does not have "[Lie]" in front if it. That is not the same as the option to tell the truth or lie. It could be that both of those options are lies, in which case there is no provision for actually telling the truth.
DMuehlhausen wrote: »There should always be a counter option for sure, but lying is fine if that is the type of character I want to play.
just to place it here
Yes, that's another example like the Razum Dar one, in that with both you have the option to tell the truth or lie, and in each case both options progress the exchange satisfactorily so there's no requirement to lie. This one would have been made more interesting if you had a third option to say "Actually I was planning on using the room to store my Daedric memorabilia, is that a problem?"
just to place it here
Yes, that's another example like the Razum Dar one, in that with both you have the option to tell the truth or lie, and in each case both options progress the exchange satisfactorily so there's no requirement to lie. This one would have been made more interesting if you had a third option to say "Actually I was planning on using the room to store my Daedric memorabilia, is that a problem?"
No, it's not. "Lie" and "Goodbye" has no option to tell the truth.
In both cases.
Same. My orc likely stared at her all 🤨 You're not stopping me from setting up a small shrine to Malacath to pray at, Lady.just to place it here
Yes, that's another example like the Razum Dar one, in that with both you have the option to tell the truth or lie, and in each case both options progress the exchange satisfactorily so there's no requirement to lie. This one would have been made more interesting if you had a third option to say "Actually I was planning on using the room to store my Daedric memorabilia, is that a problem?"
AD are characteristically liars anyways. Come join the Ebonheart pact where our own worst enemy is ourselves.
PrinceShroob wrote: »It appears that if you go to Khenarthi's Roost immediately out of the tutorial, you will only have access to the [Lie] option, since the other dialogues where you do not lie require either completing "Soul Shriven in Coldharbour" or "God of Schemes" first.
However, you can travel to Vulkhel Guard in Auridon and speak to the Hooded Figure; that will let you start and complete "Soul Shriven in Coldharbour." Then you won't have to lie to complete the quest.
PrinceShroob wrote: »It appears that if you go to Khenarthi's Roost immediately out of the tutorial, you will only have access to the [Lie] option, since the other dialogues where you do not lie require either completing "Soul Shriven in Coldharbour" or "God of Schemes" first.
However, you can travel to Vulkhel Guard in Auridon and speak to the Hooded Figure; that will let you start and complete "Soul Shriven in Coldharbour." Then you won't have to lie to complete the quest.
Thank you. That both explains our disagreement on the facts and is helpful info.
I just got a new account, and made the first char, and the very first starter quest in Khenarthi Roost can only progress if the character lies. I won't get to do the entire zone quest line.