The problem with this is, it is just another mean to Other people in an otherwise anonymous forum. Even if it were optional, those who choose not to participate will most definitely be pre-judged based on that decision, as well as the pre-judging and potential for derision for those who do participate.
It's all so entirely unnecessary in this medium.
demonology89 wrote: »This is a forum to discuss a game. This is a community of gamers first and foremost.
I don't want to be addressed by anything other than my user name or "hey fellow gamer!" And to be blunt, I don't care to address anyone else here by anything other than a user name or "hey fellow gamer!"
So if I was explaining one of your posts to someone I'd say "demonology89 said that when demonology89 tried it demonology89 was told it wasn't compatible" instead of "said that she tried it..." or "said that they tried it..." or whatever?
As a one-off just using names instead of pronouns can work, but if you need to refer to a person more than once, especially within a sentence it gets very clunky.
(Pronouns are not a new thing, and include words like 'we' 'I' 'they' 'you' 'who' 'somebody' 'everyone' and 'us', basically any way of referring to someone which is not their name. Genuinely not using any is very impractical in English.)
demonology89 wrote: »This is a forum to discuss a game. This is a community of gamers first and foremost.
I don't want to be addressed by anything other than my user name or "hey fellow gamer!" And to be blunt, I don't care to address anyone else here by anything other than a user name or "hey fellow gamer!"
So if I was explaining one of your posts to someone I'd say "demonology89 said that when demonology89 tried it demonology89 was told it wasn't compatible" instead of "said that she tried it..." or "said that they tried it..." or whatever?
As a one-off just using names instead of pronouns can work, but if you need to refer to a person more than once, especially within a sentence it gets very clunky.
(Pronouns are not a new thing, and include words like 'we' 'I' 'they' 'you' 'who' 'somebody' 'everyone' and 'us', basically any way of referring to someone which is not their name. Genuinely not using any is very impractical in English.)
But we generally use third person pronouns when the person we are referring to isn't there. The new way people wish to use pronouns is not the traditional sense.
spartaxoxo wrote: »demonology89 wrote: »This is a forum to discuss a game. This is a community of gamers first and foremost.
I don't want to be addressed by anything other than my user name or "hey fellow gamer!" And to be blunt, I don't care to address anyone else here by anything other than a user name or "hey fellow gamer!"
So if I was explaining one of your posts to someone I'd say "demonology89 said that when demonology89 tried it demonology89 was told it wasn't compatible" instead of "said that she tried it..." or "said that they tried it..." or whatever?
As a one-off just using names instead of pronouns can work, but if you need to refer to a person more than once, especially within a sentence it gets very clunky.
(Pronouns are not a new thing, and include words like 'we' 'I' 'they' 'you' 'who' 'somebody' 'everyone' and 'us', basically any way of referring to someone which is not their name. Genuinely not using any is very impractical in English.)
But we generally use third person pronouns when the person we are referring to isn't there. The new way people wish to use pronouns is not the traditional sense.
They has been used as a first person pronoun on occasion since Shakespeare.
thesarahandcompany wrote: »I'm wondering if there even is a way, outside of the signature, to enter pronouns. If there isn't, could a mod confirm whether that's a possibility?
@ZOS_GinaBruno -- Happy to help with this. I work for a national LGBTQ+ rights org and can link to resources if they're needed. It would mean a lot and have an immediate positive impact on a lot of people.
spartaxoxo wrote: »demonology89 wrote: »This is a forum to discuss a game. This is a community of gamers first and foremost.
I don't want to be addressed by anything other than my user name or "hey fellow gamer!" And to be blunt, I don't care to address anyone else here by anything other than a user name or "hey fellow gamer!"
So if I was explaining one of your posts to someone I'd say "demonology89 said that when demonology89 tried it demonology89 was told it wasn't compatible" instead of "said that she tried it..." or "said that they tried it..." or whatever?
As a one-off just using names instead of pronouns can work, but if you need to refer to a person more than once, especially within a sentence it gets very clunky.
(Pronouns are not a new thing, and include words like 'we' 'I' 'they' 'you' 'who' 'somebody' 'everyone' and 'us', basically any way of referring to someone which is not their name. Genuinely not using any is very impractical in English.)
But we generally use third person pronouns when the person we are referring to isn't there. The new way people wish to use pronouns is not the traditional sense.
They has been used as a first person pronoun on occasion since Shakespeare.
Do you mean as singular and plural third person? I'm not being difficult I just can't see how 'they' would work as a first person pronoun, or where it would exist in Shakespeare? Genuinely happy to learn something if I'm wrong.
Wanted to chime in here. I don't believe there is a way to display pronouns in base Vanilla software. There must be a plug-in somewhere that can enable this, but not positive on that. So we can do some investigating on that and how it would play with our other languages. If there isn't a plug-in available, we can submit the idea to Vanilla as a potential feature to build in the future.
However, as others have noted, certainly feel free to note pronouns in your signature if you feel inclined to do so. No harm in that.
Couldn't agree with you more.Lady_Galadhiel wrote: »Isn't there more important subjects to talk about on the ESO forum than this?
I'm surprised it's still open tbh, as any other un ESO related topic would have surely been closed by now.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Couldn't agree with you more.Lady_Galadhiel wrote: »Isn't there more important subjects to talk about on the ESO forum than this?
I'm surprised it's still open tbh, as any other un ESO related topic would have surely been closed by now.
The ESO forum's interface is a legitimate topic of the ESO forums.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Couldn't agree with you more.Lady_Galadhiel wrote: »Isn't there more important subjects to talk about on the ESO forum than this?
I'm surprised it's still open tbh, as any other un ESO related topic would have surely been closed by now.
The ESO forum's interface is a legitimate topic of the ESO forums.
I disagree. Please explain how it directly pertains to the game itself.
spartaxoxo wrote: »...I don't understand why it's a problem to know what the correct one is rather than just using a generic they/them...
SilverBride wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »...I don't understand why it's a problem to know what the correct one is rather than just using a generic they/them...
The problem with that is who defines what the correct one is? This can open up a can of worms that we don't need in a gaming forum.
spartaxoxo wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »...I don't understand why it's a problem to know what the correct one is rather than just using a generic they/them...
The problem with that is who defines what the correct one is? This can open up a can of worms that we don't need in a gaming forum.
The person who selected it. The person who gets to define the "About Me" an any social media thing is the person filling it out.