Is this exclusive to the server performance improvements that have been promised/talked about for a few years now? If the plan is to eventually upgrade the servers to address performance issues, does buying new hardware of the same tier as the old before it breaks from age mean that there will not be an additional purchase of HIGHER tier hardware to improve performance in the future?
Or is that something that is still planned separate from the hardware you are currently installing (which will not improve performance)?
FlopsyPrince wrote: »Pyr0xyrecuprotite wrote: »thejadefalcon wrote: »Can we ask why you're doing PC NA first, when PC EU historically has, by far, the most problems? Particularly with unplanned maintenance, which you say this will help to solve?
keep in mind that the EU players were originally hosted on the PC/NA servers at launch in 2014, and only got a separate server setup quite a few months later (after a lot of performance complaints). That is, the EU servers are of about 2 years more recent vintage than the NA server hardware. I'm sure that ZoS is aware of needing to refresh them, but it hasn't been quite as urgent as for the NA servers. It gets REALLY hard to source compatible spare parts on 10-year old hardware (or anything more than 5 years old I suppose).
It is possible they were doing lots of system-specific things in code, but normally updating hardware is not this hard.
They better consider that before they fall into failure because of needing that really old hardware!
xXSilverDragonXx wrote: »Just dawned on me this is a really good time to screw around on the PTS.
xXSilverDragonXx wrote: »Just dawned on me this is a really good time to screw around on the PTS.
xXSilverDragonXx wrote: »As much as I would like to be playing right now, I'm thrilled they are doing this updating and I truly hope we notice a very desirable improvement ASAP. Load screens had still been really long and watching my latency hit the red randomly or seeing sudden bouts of lag and freezing here and there was a bit disconcerting.
catdancer1_ESO wrote: »my big question is about the daily rewards. this will mess up the end-of-month reward, right?
VoidCommander wrote: »How late is the maintenance expected to last on the 3rd (today, PST)?
catdancer1_ESO wrote: »my big question is about the daily rewards. this will mess up the end-of-month reward, right?
fgoron2000 wrote: »catdancer1_ESO wrote: »my big question is about the daily rewards. this will mess up the end-of-month reward, right?
Not necessarily. If you picked it up last evening after the reset at 7pm ET (or is it 8pm? I forget) then you wouldn't even have the next reward offered until after tonight's reset anyway. And if you didn't get it last evening, it depends on how close they come to the 6pm ET estimate. If they get it up and running before 7pm (8pm?) then you can still get the reward before it resets again.
catdancer1_ESO wrote: »my big question is about the daily rewards. this will mess up the end-of-month reward, right?
VoidCommander wrote: »How late is the maintenance expected to last on the 3rd (today, PST)?
Don't worry, they probably sent someone to Home Depot to pick up an extension cord and some electrical tape, but he's stuck in traffic right now. Should be back soon!
Gaeliannas wrote: »I am very curious how you can upgrade from 2012 hardware to 2022 and not get a performance increase? Regardless of how bad your code it, running it on faster processors, with more cores, and faster memory and I would hope way faster storage since flash arrays are relatively cheap now, add up to a guaranteed performance increase. So how is ZOS managing to not allow that to happen? And better yet, why?
VoidCommander wrote: »How late is the maintenance expected to last on the 3rd (today, PST)?
Don't worry, they probably sent someone to Home Depot to pick up an extension cord and some electrical tape, but he's stuck in traffic right now. Should be back soon!
TechMaybeHic wrote: »I'm baffled by how replacing 2012 servers years later will not provide performance improvement. Is this equivalent of replacing a windows 7 gaming PC with a Chromebook?
Why?
Well, they did put the new time at the top of the forum, which is where everyone’s going to look for it. That said, it’s not surprising whatsoever that a major change like switching to servers that are 10 years newer might take longer than expected.Wow... looking everywhere for news on why were the servers still down when it was scheduled for 18:00 UTC. Apparently they ninja changed it to 22:00 UTC. No communication whatsoever.
Well, they did put the new time at the top of the forum, which is where everyone’s going to look for it. That said, it’s not surprising whatsoever that a major change like switching to servers that are 10 years newer might take longer than expected.Wow... looking everywhere for news on why were the servers still down when it was scheduled for 18:00 UTC. Apparently they ninja changed it to 22:00 UTC. No communication whatsoever.
Merenwen_812 wrote: »Well, they did put the new time at the top of the forum, which is where everyone’s going to look for it. That said, it’s not surprising whatsoever that a major change like switching to servers that are 10 years newer might take longer than expected.Wow... looking everywhere for news on why were the servers still down when it was scheduled for 18:00 UTC. Apparently they ninja changed it to 22:00 UTC. No communication whatsoever.
and I am sure I am not the only one that kept refreshing watching for an extended time to be added :P
I really hope ESO decides to gives us some compensation for almost a entire day in maintenance! I'll lost the endeavors and other stuff because today is almost over to me. I don't live in US or Canada, btw.
Merenwen_812 wrote: »xXSilverDragonXx wrote: »Just dawned on me this is a really good time to screw around on the PTS.
good idea, except I deleted it and need to redownload
so the PTS can be played when the NA is down? I may go ahead and attempt it, never know might download faster than they can come back up xD