ESO_Nightingale wrote: »
I think it's fine to keep arctic wind and polar wind as health based tank heals. But arctic blast does not need this because it really needs to focus on the damage and stun portions. The healing for pvp dps should absolutely just be in green balance.
confettibae wrote: »What about the magden dps in PVE (I take that char to an occasional bg or ic run, it’s built for PVE) who doesn’t have super high health and relies on this as a burst heal? I mean aside from the fact that to actually stun someone I have to spam it, as it only gives a chance to stun, person has to be hit with it what, 3 times? And that would totally drain my magicka at 3564 mag a pop, if I am in PVP it’s not like someone doesn’t have the opportunity to throw up a damage shield or roll out of the way before it stuns or does any significant damage.
The heal over time is 643 every one second for 5 seconds so not that much, while throwing 1642 dmg per second for 4 seconds, again, not that much. The appeal to me is the burst heal, and all of my chars are able to heal while doing damage in some form or another. I hesitate to list them given the circumstances. I would have rather the negligible amount of damage be reduced in some way or another than the heal, or have a version that stuns without the heal as a morph.
I’ve been killed by quite a few wardens while playing other characters and none of them killed me with artic blast. They were more experienced players or outnumbered me and even if I’m on a more PvP centered build I fully expect to die under those circumstances, not salty about it at all.
You don't need to spam for the CC. The ticks can proc it.
And nobody actually cares about the stun and damage to be honest. Even if they took that away instead of nerfing the heal, it still wouldn't fix it as the problem is how high it can heal and scales with max health.
For a DD spec you have the mushroom heal.
You don't need to spam for the CC. The ticks can proc it.
And nobody actually cares about the stun and damage to be honest. Even if they took that away instead of nerfing the heal, it still wouldn't fix it as the problem is how high it can heal and scales with max health.
For a DD spec you have the mushroom heal.
Seraphayel wrote: »
Arctic Blast solely as a heal bothers no one. It’s in fact the stun / chill component on top that makes this skill so strong. Arctic Blast solely as a heal would be fine. Nerfing the heal, but keeping all the other factors attached to it, doesn’t do much to solve the initial problem.
RedFireDisco wrote: »20% reduction to Arctic Wind heal is way too much. It's not a big heal even on a high health build.
I can't remember the last time I saw a 20% nerf to a single class ability. Even at 10% that's pretty harsh.
Add this to a 50% reduction in upcoming health regen and that's going to kill a whole swag of Warden builds outright.
Not good enough. Buff other classes instead of destroying people's builds.
Yes it does.
The damage is nothing, the stun is a bit annoying, but not a huge issue.
Health based heals are the problem.
In fact on my server there's a group of two warden that go around using the other morph, that's heals someone else, and it's absolutely dumb trying to turn them.
Again, as someone who has played Paladins in other MMOs I am used to having a tanky character with heal skills going back roughly 15 years of various titles
Similar with playing a Cleric or Paladin in D&D -- tend to be tanky with self heals, ability to do damage exists but is mitigated by spell slots (tabletop) or cooldowns (other MMOs)
ZOS having no cooldown on their skills does a lot to break the fundamentals of the trinity as it is because healers can toss heals until they run out of resources, and DPS rotation is fixed based on the duration of effects, rather than the timer on being able to cast the skill again
Joy_Division wrote: »
But Paladins and Clerics were not nearly the capable front-line offensive combatants that Barbarians and Fighters were (excepting the Clerics of D&D 3.5 with 20 sourcebooks shenanigans). Wardens have been top tier since they were introduced to the game.
Wardens were top tier before ZOS gave them Arctic Blast. That people are resisting this change just goes to show how most people do not care about balance, they just care that their own abilities remain as strong as they can possibly be, while having no problem flooding these forums to nerf other classes.
^
Exactly this.
And much appreciation for the warden players who've spoken up to say that yes, this skill is overloaded in it's capabilities.
Your honesty and care for actual balance is something I hope ZoS takes into account.
Joy_Division wrote: »
But Paladins and Clerics were not nearly the capable front-line offensive combatants that Barbarians and Fighters were (excepting the Clerics of D&D 3.5 with 20 sourcebooks shenanigans). Wardens have been top tier since they were introduced to the game.
Wardens were top tier before ZOS gave them Arctic Blast. That people are resisting this change just goes to show how most people do not care about balance, they just care that their own abilities remain as strong as they can possibly be, while having no problem flooding these forums to nerf other classes.
Thank you for repeating my point in a manner that garnered more agrees -- my post clearly stated that Cleric or Paladins in other games have their ability to do damage limited by mechanics that ZOS has decided are unimportant here
have personally been advocating for something to be done about the offensive side of this skill due to personally using the healing morph for PvE tanking since shortly after Warden was added to the game (had left, but came back about a month after Morrowind launch and made 3 Wardens)
a skill for survivability does not need to be loaded up with offensive bonuses; however, there are apparently people stating that no actually the healing is the problem, not the offensive capabilities, and that this skill is an example of Health based heals (so presumably also Dragon Blood and Dark Cloak) being too powerful
If anything, it is interesting to me to see you advocate that the class is too *offensively* strong, but also expressing that you think nerfing some of its *defensive* potential is an adequate solution
Isn't the additional defensive mechanics from classes (like Cleric or Paladin that you mentioned) from heals? They have less damage mitigation, so they make up for that with heals.
.
Do you need a refresher on our conversation?
You said you think that tanks should not have as much healing or damage output because the trinity has them focus on damage mitigation
I pointed out that tanking as a Cleric or Paladin done by having heals that make up for less damage mitigation, and that their focus on self-heals are how they tank; I also stated at that point that my own approach to changing this skill would have been to remove the damage of the skill
I am still advocating for this -- nerf the damage potential of the skill and keep it as a heal for tanking
if the Arctic Blast morph is going to be a DPS skill with a CC on it, have that morph drop the heal in exchange for picking up the stun
It seems the biggest contrast between myself and others in this thread is simply that I view this skill primarily as a heal that works for PvE tanking, and that its focus should be on healing and tanking rather than damage
I'd be fine with the skill (particularly the heal morph) doing ticks of 1 damage per hit, if that was the only way ZOS could figure out how to make it into a Heal skill that also applied Maim to crowds of adds
I do not currently use the stun morph, and I have not used the stun morph in the past when the skill functioned as a single-target stun + self heal