They also want access to your twitch and facebook accounts to determine if you were doing something wrong. The more I review this, the more intrusive it seems.
Here's a strawman scenario.
During an hour long fight over the last EMP Keep, you killed streamer FancyPants 3 times. According to your facebook you have donated to the "Give puppies a home" foundation multiple time. Streamer FancyPants is an advocate for "Give kittens a home" and speaks often of this during streams. You are clearly in violation of ours terms of conduct and have been warn. Any further warning and your account can be suspended.
As I said, this is a strawman scenario, maybe.
Here's a strawman scenario.
During an hour long fight over the last EMP Keep, you killed streamer FancyPants 3 times. According to your facebook you have donated to the "Give puppies a home" foundation multiple time. Streamer FancyPants is an advocate for "Give kittens a home" and speaks often of this during streams. You are clearly in violation of ours terms of conduct and have been warn. Any further warning and your account can be suspended.
As I said, this is a strawman scenario, maybe.
Or you kill streamerman957 and he says "this guy is stream sniping". Do you get banned?
Unfortunately you have no choice but to agree with the TOS in order to Play the game
Even debating the TOS will probably result in a shown down thread.
Here's a strawman scenario.
During an hour long fight over the last EMP Keep, you killed streamer FancyPants 3 times. According to your facebook you have donated to the "Give puppies a home" foundation multiple time. Streamer FancyPants is an advocate for "Give kittens a home" and speaks often of this during streams. You are clearly in violation of ours terms of conduct and have been warn. Any further warning and your account can be suspended.
As I said, this is a strawman scenario, maybe.
Or you kill streamerman957 and he says "this guy is stream sniping". Do you get banned?
It's more interesting to read wrapped around a story, but yes, basically that's what I was saying. Any popular streamer can petition to get some "nobody" banned.
Jayman1000 wrote: »
The stream sniping thing is interesting. It's a pretty cheesy thing to do and definitely trolly, but something about it seems odd. I guess the whole thing about your social media will let them verify if you were watching something and not just take a streamers word that someone is sniping them. Because in open world sometimes you are in the same areas and tend to hang in that spot and I've seen people just assume they are getting sniped b/c they ran into the same person over and over (when it's happened to me not streaming - it just happens sometimes). It should definitely be a 100% proof case to ban someone for sniping, no question they did it at all type thing. I also think false reporting should be treated as griefing as well.
Texecutioner187 wrote: »The stream sniping thing is interesting. It's a pretty cheesy thing to do and definitely trolly, but something about it seems odd. I guess the whole thing about your social media will let them verify if you were watching something and not just take a streamers word that someone is sniping them. Because in open world sometimes you are in the same areas and tend to hang in that spot and I've seen people just assume they are getting sniped b/c they ran into the same person over and over (when it's happened to me not streaming - it just happens sometimes). It should definitely be a 100% proof case to ban someone for sniping, no question they did it at all type thing. I also think false reporting should be treated as griefing as well.
Pardon me for being extremely ignorant, but what is "stream sniping"?
"Updated the ZeniMax Media Code of Conduct, with the most noteworthy change being that we added doxing, stream sniping, and intentional acts of griefing or humiliation to behavior we do not tolerate."
What exactly entails "intentional acts of griefing or humiliation"? If I'm in imperial city and I kill the same quester 20 times in a row, does zenimax consider that "griefing"?
If I kill a player and play emotes or crouch on their body, is that considered "humiliation"?
It's unfortunate that we now have to ask for clarification on what is "acceptable" in pvp and what isn't, but it seems we have somehow gotten to this point.
Texecutioner187 wrote: »The stream sniping thing is interesting. It's a pretty cheesy thing to do and definitely trolly, but something about it seems odd. I guess the whole thing about your social media will let them verify if you were watching something and not just take a streamers word that someone is sniping them. Because in open world sometimes you are in the same areas and tend to hang in that spot and I've seen people just assume they are getting sniped b/c they ran into the same person over and over (when it's happened to me not streaming - it just happens sometimes). It should definitely be a 100% proof case to ban someone for sniping, no question they did it at all type thing. I also think false reporting should be treated as griefing as well.
Pardon me for being extremely ignorant, but what is "stream sniping"?
2) If you teabag someone (let's not hide it under harmless words .. this is what you describe) : IMO, that's not nice, that's despicable, childish and it's sure as hell is humiliation and griefing. Maybe a bit of empathy would be a nice thing to acquire, in that case.
VaranisArano wrote: »Is it just me, or do some of the Crown Store emotes seem a little inconsistent with the new TOS?
"Flip the Bird"
Or the mistletoe posterior one
I mean, I understand that everything that can be, will be misused eventually. But we've had enough griefing issues over the years with mudballs at outfit stations that I'm both glad that ZOS put in specific language to cover those situations AND ought to put more thought into what mixed messages they send with emotes added to the game.
Texecutioner187 wrote: »Where are these patch notes?
Texecutioner187 wrote: »Where are these patch notes?
VaranisArano wrote: »Is it just me, or do some of the Crown Store emotes seem a little inconsistent with the new TOS?
"Flip the Bird"
Or the mistletoe posterior one
I mean, I understand that everything that can be, will be misused eventually. But we've had enough griefing issues over the years with mudballs at outfit stations that I'm both glad that ZOS put in specific language to cover those situations AND ought to put more thought into what mixed messages they send with emotes added to the game.
There's also that Sad Violin one as well. I agree, though. Pretty inconsistent and it's sending mixed messages on what their expectations of acceptable behaviors are (aside from the given). I don't think just doing one emote every once in a while would be considered harassment, but given how vague wording is--people handling the ticket will act on how ever they interpret the wording. While I'm glad they're trying to do something about it, I'm worried about the folks that do /sweep when someone turns into a pile of ash.