it's 26% of the vote.... 30% got 1 completed with nothing extra. So 56% got one or both with no cash store.
I'd say it's well within the "norm".
(statistically relevant is <5% (or <1% if being extra precise))
it's 26% of the vote.... 30% got 1 completed with nothing extra. So 56% got one or both with no cash store.
I'd say it's well within the "norm".
(statistically relevant is <5% (or <1% if being extra precise))
it's 26% of the vote.... 30% got 1 completed with nothing extra. So 56% got one or both with no cash store.
I'd say it's well within the "norm".
(statistically relevant is <5% (or <1% if being extra precise))
Yeah, well, some people will cling desperately to their alleged personal victimization no matter what statistics are provided. A quick look at the numbers here really flies in the face of the "ZOS is forcing people to buy tickets" narrative. Even in the cases where people did spend crowns, most people only bought one or two additional tickets. I missed two days of the event and still managed to get exactly what I wanted, which didn't include the pet or the memento.
PizzaCat82 wrote: »
it's 26% of the vote.... 30% got 1 completed with nothing extra. So 56% got one or both with no cash store.
I'd say it's well within the "norm".
(statistically relevant is <5% (or <1% if being extra precise))
Yeah, well, some people will cling desperately to their alleged personal victimization no matter what statistics are provided. A quick look at the numbers here really flies in the face of the "ZOS is forcing people to buy tickets" narrative. Even in the cases where people did spend crowns, most people only bought one or two additional tickets. I missed two days of the event and still managed to get exactly what I wanted, which didn't include the pet or the memento.
The only acceptable outcome was everyone who "tried" to get the rewards would get them. Just because you're okay with nothing doesn't mean those who invested time in the event deserved the same.
PizzaCat82 wrote: »
it's 26% of the vote.... 30% got 1 completed with nothing extra. So 56% got one or both with no cash store.
I'd say it's well within the "norm".
(statistically relevant is <5% (or <1% if being extra precise))
Yeah, well, some people will cling desperately to their alleged personal victimization no matter what statistics are provided. A quick look at the numbers here really flies in the face of the "ZOS is forcing people to buy tickets" narrative. Even in the cases where people did spend crowns, most people only bought one or two additional tickets. I missed two days of the event and still managed to get exactly what I wanted, which didn't include the pet or the memento.
The only acceptable outcome was everyone who "tried" to get the rewards would get them. Just because you're okay with nothing doesn't mean those who invested time in the event deserved the same.
Everyone doesn't get a trophy simply for participating where I come from. Better luck next year.
PizzaCat82 wrote: »
it's 26% of the vote.... 30% got 1 completed with nothing extra. So 56% got one or both with no cash store.
I'd say it's well within the "norm".
(statistically relevant is <5% (or <1% if being extra precise))
Yeah, well, some people will cling desperately to their alleged personal victimization no matter what statistics are provided. A quick look at the numbers here really flies in the face of the "ZOS is forcing people to buy tickets" narrative. Even in the cases where people did spend crowns, most people only bought one or two additional tickets. I missed two days of the event and still managed to get exactly what I wanted, which didn't include the pet or the memento.
The only acceptable outcome was everyone who "tried" to get the rewards would get them. Just because you're okay with nothing doesn't mean those who invested time in the event deserved the same.
Everyone doesn't get a trophy simply for participating where I come from. Better luck next year.
for events, yes that is the way it is supposed to be. Its not suppose to be a competition, it is supposed to be a celebration. Its supposed to bring back players and keep them not push them away. Please, you may want to ask yourself why you feel the need to defend a company that does not care about you so much.
While I expected a ratcheting up of predatory monetization in this game, I didn't expect blatant coercion.
As much as I find offering event tickets in the cash shop to be objectionable in of itself, I can grant a reluctant pass to offering them provided their purchase is genuinely optional to complete an event. To put this another way, it is begrudgingly acceptable (though hardly ideal) to offer event tickets in the cash shop provided it is possible for ALL players to complete event rewards by simply playing the game for a reasonable amount of time.
This event was something different. It was NOT possible for ALL players to complete event rewards by simply playing the game for a reasonable amount of time. This is a blatantly coercive attempt to force customers into the cash shop to win event rewards. This is about the WORST form of predatory monetization a video game can have in it. Deliberate coercion of a customer like this is straight up a con game and if it isn't already illegal, should be.