eklhaftb16_ESO wrote: »
Nah, that's just... weird... -o.eklhaftb16_ESO wrote: »
Same here. Really hoped for that cute kitty, especially for my second account on the NA server where I don't spend any crowns. Would have fitted my "good witch" templar perfectly.I was hoping we'd get the datamined cute black kitty wearing the witch hat, but I should have known it'd be a 300 gem only pet instead
I know right, cause obviously they only have one team working on everything and need to get their priorities straight. ugh.Canned_Apples wrote: »Totally makes up for the delayed pts notes.
Ugly, disfigured, unpleasant and straight up foul and disgusting are always never given credit for what they are actually worth. It take more time and effort to make more displeasing versus pretty, hip, trendy and catchy.This is the most ugly pet I have ever seen. I don't even know if I want to get it or stop claiming log-in rewards the day before that.
eklhaftb16_ESO wrote: »
I'm not into cute and "trendy" pets only. I actually dearly LOVE my Craglorn Welwa and my Durzog pup. THAT'S the kind of ugly I likeUgly, disfigured, unpleasant and straight up foul and disgusting are always never given credit for what they are actually worth. It take more time and effort to make more displeasing versus pretty, hip, trendy and catchy.This is the most ugly pet I have ever seen. I don't even know if I want to get it or stop claiming log-in rewards the day before that.
While yes the design will be subjective - it show more effort and dedication in just a simple pet than majority of the costumes, motifs, mounts and other pets combined. The detail isn't rushed, the pattern offers a unique approach to wander about to see all not just focus on a singular point. a balanced mixture of symmetrical and asymmetrical rolled in to one. And for the size as well, the detail doesn't get mushed nor distorted which is often found in the more popular "pretty, cute, adorable, trendy, cliche" pets and styles.
More ugly is needed. It is far easier to make pretty and requires little effort and thought. Skill and Talent combined shines outside the box of pretty and normality.
StormChaser3000 wrote: »eklhaftb16_ESO wrote: »
It has an animation as if it stepped in a pile of sh*t and then examins it's foot...
I'm not into cute and "trendy" pets only. I actually dearly LOVE my Craglorn Welwa and my Durzog pup. THAT'S the kind of ugly I likeUgly, disfigured, unpleasant and straight up foul and disgusting are always never given credit for what they are actually worth. It take more time and effort to make more displeasing versus pretty, hip, trendy and catchy.This is the most ugly pet I have ever seen. I don't even know if I want to get it or stop claiming log-in rewards the day before that.
While yes the design will be subjective - it show more effort and dedication in just a simple pet than majority of the costumes, motifs, mounts and other pets combined. The detail isn't rushed, the pattern offers a unique approach to wander about to see all not just focus on a singular point. a balanced mixture of symmetrical and asymmetrical rolled in to one. And for the size as well, the detail doesn't get mushed nor distorted which is often found in the more popular "pretty, cute, adorable, trendy, cliche" pets and styles.
More ugly is needed. It is far easier to make pretty and requires little effort and thought. Skill and Talent combined shines outside the box of pretty and normality.
This one, for me, is just plain ugly and not my cup of tea.
MehrunesFlagon wrote: »StormChaser3000 wrote: »eklhaftb16_ESO wrote: »
It has an animation as if it stepped in a pile of sh*t and then examins it's foot...
It looks like a demon,clown,dwarf and mummy combined. WTF is this thing?
eklhaftb16_ESO wrote: »