DragonRacer wrote: »Yes, this is largely a problem only on our server. I have talked to GMs on both PC servers and they do not have the Mafia issue we do.
I do not see XBox GMs complain here of such issues.
And PS4 EU also does not seem to have this issue.
Our server on PS4 NA is literally controlled by one to two people who force any guild wanting to be in a capital or large city to bend the knee to their empire or be threatened with being driven out of such cities. This has been going on for years and only gets worse.
There is actually a guild that was under their knee that literally posted a MOTD update recently that they are converting to a social/PvE only guild moving forward. All due to the stress and suffering that comes with serving the Mafia on our server. It is literally driving some people away from the game entirely.
I cannot even attempt to stay in a city like Vivec or Alinor for any length of time because they swarm in to drive me and my ilk out (the large donation-based guilds who refuse to join the Mafia and verbally speak out against them).
There's also rumored to be a LOT of bot money feeding this machine, to the point dues probably aren't even necessary but I imagine it sure is nice to rake in billions. Yes, capital cities cost a lot to bid in - but PS4 NA seems to have an entirely unique problem/situation caused by a small handful of people.
Welcome to Game of Thrones.
You would be better off not paying them their blood money and instead joining one of the dues-free guilds and making reasonable donations to help them. The multi-bid update is bringing an apocalypse to our shores and all the help dues-free guilds can get will be welcomed since I'm sure the Mafia will do what they can to try and lock things down even tighter. I guess the fake ghost guilds will maybe be stocked with goods this time, since at least they won't be able to re-sell those trader positions anymore so I'm sure they'll be converted to shell guilds simply to keep other guilds out.
DragonRacer wrote: »Jayman1000 wrote: »You console people have to pay a fee in ANY guild no matter how much sales you got? I sincerely have to doubt this.... though that's pretty messed up. Imagine someone selling for 2million a week and then STILL demanding them to pay 20k fee just like the guy that made 5k sales that week. Im not on console so I dont know the facts of how it is on console, but I have a hard time believing it really is as you say it is. On my pc guilds I have to make around 300-500k in sales per week depending on the guild, and if that is not met only THEN do I need to contribute a raffle donation of like 30-50k. This is totally fair in my opinion, and these examples are the absolute TOP guilds. Most other guilds have much lower sales requirements.
Either step up, or step out.
And to repeat - PC has add-ones that let you see how much each person has sold.
CONSOLE DOES NOT HAVE THAT LUXURY.
We have NO way to know what each member is hitting for sales. It is literally impossible to set a sales quota or minimum. Period. So, yes, for the guilds that charge dues - EVERYONE has to pay those dues weekly.
You have console players telling you how it works on our system. Why and how is this hard to believe?
BlazingDynamo wrote: »Massacre_Wurm wrote: »BlazingDynamo wrote: »BlazingDynamo wrote: »Are we the only server having this issue? 20k a week is absurd to pay for a trading guild. The only ones with enough gold to take the top trading spots on a weekly basis are themselves so who are they raising the prices in fear of?
This is blatant greed at this point. It's already well know alot of the profits get pocketed but now you're just making it obvious.
This is why Zos needs to rework the trading system. Zone chat is free remember.
You always have the option to leave the guild...
Excellent suggestion. Glad you added to this conversation. 11/10
And what do you expect ? One of my guilds have raised fee to 20k. I am not paying it because there is many other options. Simple.
I wasn't asking for a suggestion or a smart ass remark. I asked if other servers were experiencing similar issues.
It's possible that the reason you are getting snark is because you are complaining about an optional organization charging you more to be a member. There isn't a problem with the trading system. You aren't being forced to be a member of that specific guild. If the dues don't lineup with the gold you are making at the trader, leave the trader.
Around 2 or 3 months ago, my Mournhold trader increased dues from 10-20K because they kept getting sniped and wanted to ensure that we always had that trader. I rolled with the change because I make far more than 20K a week at that location and it was worth it. If it wasn't, I wouldn't be a part of that guild any more. It is that easy.
BlazingDynamo wrote: »Are we the only server having this issue? 20k a week is absurd to pay for a trading guild. The only ones with enough gold to take the top trading spots on a weekly basis are themselves so who are they raising the prices in fear of?
This is blatant greed at this point. It's already well know alot of the profits get pocketed but now you're just making it obvious.
This is why Zos needs to rework the trading system. Zone chat is free remember.
"...alot if the profits get pocketed..."
Got any proof of that? Because it's equally well-known that your claim is a pile of hooey.
disintegr8 wrote: »Surely the new system will not require a guild to have all of the gold to cover their multiple bids?
If that's the case, it's poor programming from ZOS and we are being thrown to the wolves.tahol10069 wrote: »disintegr8 wrote: »Surely the new system will not require a guild to have all of the gold to cover their multiple bids?
In other threads I've seen several people saying that yes, actually you have to cover up your multiple bids. When you bid, the money is taken out. Ofc you will get it back, but right now guilds are in the panic mode raking up the money for their first multiple bids. If they want to bid for locations worth of say...100k gold, they have to have that gold to pay for the system when they bid. If they win a location that cost 10k, they will get 90k back. So, after the first bidding round, guilds that rise fees are actually getting more money saved than before, and where is all that money going?
tahol10069 wrote: »So, after the first bidding round, guilds that rise fees are actually getting more money saved than before, and where is all that money going?
BlazingDynamo wrote: »BlazingDynamo wrote: »Are we the only server having this issue? 20k a week is absurd to pay for a trading guild. The only ones with enough gold to take the top trading spots on a weekly basis are themselves so who are they raising the prices in fear of?
This is blatant greed at this point. It's already well know alot of the profits get pocketed but now you're just making it obvious.
This is why Zos needs to rework the trading system. Zone chat is free remember.
"...alot if the profits get pocketed..."
Got any proof of that? Because it's equally well-known that your claim is a pile of hooey.
Back when you could see guild history is your proof. You don't think people stopped just because they removed public guild history do you? LOL
I out bidded a top end guild trader that was charging 10k a week back when that was the price. They were bidding 1.1 million every single week and when the news got around I dropped 1.8 mil with me and my buddies free trading guild. I got threatened but people I didn't even know lol So again they was making 5 million a week and spending 1.1 and you really think that has changed?
I wish I had saved images of in-game e-mails showing that bids of 8 million and up on prime kiosks lost. What you say may have been true in the past, but for certain kiosk locations it most certainly is not true. Dues, sales tax, and raffles barely cover bids in this age of fierce competition.
There was a thread on this issue back in May when someone on PC outbid every long term trader in Rawl'kha and claimed he/she did so with bids as low as yours. Dozens of conspiracy nuts piled on, claiming this event was 'proof' that trade guild GMs were getting rich off of dues/tax/raffles/donations.
It all fell apart when one of the losing guild GMs posted a picture of the in-game e-mail showing the losing bid of 12 million or so gold... or maybe it was 13 million.
It's very important to have concrete facts when you accuse people of deceit. The player who claimed to have 'proven' that trade guild GMs were 'pocketing millions' was instead proven to be a liar himself.
david_m_18b16_ESO wrote: »BlazingDynamo wrote: »Are we the only server having this issue? 20k a week is absurd to pay for a trading guild. The only ones with enough gold to take the top trading spots on a weekly basis are themselves so who are they raising the prices in fear of?
This is blatant greed at this point. It's already well know alot of the profits get pocketed but now you're just making it obvious.
This is why Zos needs to rework the trading system. Zone chat is free remember.
"...alot if the profits get pocketed..."
Got any proof of that? Because it's equally well-known that your claim is a pile of hooey.
Yup, that dude who won the whole zone bcuz he new how low those guild were biding.
saruhrose1 wrote: »I laugh at all of you every time complaining commences over guild dues. Yall probably don’t know who I am, don’t know my history with the “mafia” or simply don’t care.
You will never know what it was like 4 years ago… try starting a guild in the height of it all. Ghost guilds had just been thought of by a slimy lil rat name “eternal”. I was then a free guild. CO-Creater/GM of the guild Banana Surprise and GM of, the still standing guild, Spicy Burrito. We existed when the game was still playable, BEFORE one tamriel, BEFORE text chat and when the game was still very full of life. You lil whiney babies will never, ever feel the full wrath of the “mafia”. Staying up till 5am talking and conspiring against each other. Spies getting in your guild and changing every 1 of your 500 members 'guild note' to something derogatory.
Fast forward to today- I am a part of the “Mournhold Mafia”. At the point that I joined, The people I fought against for almost 2 years. Combated the “ghost guild” system and I am one of the reasons ghost guilds are (soon to be were) so vast. I now (previously free)charge dues (15k at the moment soon to be 20k).
You have to take into consideration how the game has changed. 3 years ago alloys were 20k per, we didn’t have a craft bag, there weren’t 50 million dlcs, no celebratory events, no master writs and massive amounts of Gold were… few and far between. When elements of the game change… the economy of the game changes and this time its drastic.
Anyone can be a millionaire these days. All it takes is a credit card with a decent limit.
For me- A single, divorced mother of one in school, with a full-time job, trying to get in to a nursing program at my university… I don’t have the time or the money to support a guild trader that on several occasions I have to make double digit, millions and millions of gold bids several weeks in a row.
And when the system changes? Then what? I can’t purchase a back up trader aka “ghost guild” to secure a trader. I have to dump 10s maybe even 100s of millions of gold around the map in hopes I secure a trader.
Guild trader politics are just like pve politics or pvp politics. You have your cliques, your “e-couples”, your big-time flirters, and a lot of different personalities and LOTS OF INFLATED EGOS. Its like high school.
You also have to remember there are 3 sides to every story you hear- What he said, what she said and what ACTUALLY happened.
I’ve been lied to, lied about, harassed, been made fun of, I’ve helped people who didn’t deserve it, BEEN USED and the topic of many conversations.
Eso is much like our real lives, we are all just trying to “survive”. You gotta do what you gotta do.
At the end of the day you have to remember it’s a video game. We are here to enjoy ourselves.
None of its real. But the impact you make is real. Not everyone’s a bad guy… I know many in this game who act like a innocent victim but are really a wolf in sheeps clothing.
Well I think that’s enough rambling for today… If I could give any one of you advice in this game it’s the same advice I give in real life… Treat others how you wanted to be treated. Be receptive and don’t be afraid to say sorry. People make mistakes but learn from them!
xo ESO community
-saruhrose1, PS4 NA
that was some pretty interesting stuff right there @saruhrose1 ...enjoyed reading it, thanks for sharing...
I gotta be honest though, it's hard for me to imagine the motivation to run large social/trading guilds...seems like an awful lot of work...kind of like a second job...
ha, I guess pvp is my second job...
disintegr8 wrote: »Surely the new system will not require a guild to have all of the gold to cover their multiple bids?
If the idea is that you bid for multiple locations and as soon as you get one, all other bids are void, my assumption would be that as long as you have the resources to cover your highest bid, you can bid up to that amount on as many traders as the game will allow.
Maybe ZOS should set a fixed price on all traders...
david_m_18b16_ESO wrote: »BlazingDynamo wrote: »Are we the only server having this issue? 20k a week is absurd to pay for a trading guild. The only ones with enough gold to take the top trading spots on a weekly basis are themselves so who are they raising the prices in fear of?
This is blatant greed at this point. It's already well know alot of the profits get pocketed but now you're just making it obvious.
This is why Zos needs to rework the trading system. Zone chat is free remember.
"...alot if the profits get pocketed..."
Got any proof of that? Because it's equally well-known that your claim is a pile of hooey.
Yup, that dude who won the whole zone bcuz he new how low those guild were biding.
Again, the only solution is to have a bidding system in place, in which the top 150 or so bidders will receive a random trading spot.
disintegr8 wrote: »Surely the new system will not require a guild to have all of the gold to cover their multiple bids?
If the idea is that you bid for multiple locations and as soon as you get one, all other bids are void, my assumption would be that as long as you have the resources to cover your highest bid, you can bid up to that amount on as many traders as the game will allow.
Maybe ZOS should set a fixed price on all traders...
It was quite clear in the Scalebreaker Announcement that a guild must have sufficient resources for each bid. Despite incredible mental gymnastics, faulty logic, and wishful thinking on the part of many Forum dwellers... one gold coin does not suddenly become ten with Update 23. If you want to place 10 bids totalling 20 million, you must have 20 million. The official word is unequivocal on that point, and further speculation is pointless.
As for the idea of having Big Brother set prices... that Stendarr ZoS wants nothing to do with that.
Again, the only solution is to have a bidding system in place, in which the top 150 or so bidders will receive a random trading spot.
There is a certain appeal in a lottery system. A lottery could remove the power of money at a stroke; if it was set up properly.
Has drawbacks though: uncertainty for a start, possibility of gaming the system (flood the bidding process with guilds working together) and how the system would cater for lower tier guilds/new entrants. There is also the possibility of penalising those guilds who have worked their way up fairly, only to find they lose to the luck of the draw.
In principle, the lottery concept does have some advantages. It also has some major drawbacks.
And restricting it to the top bidders would be wrong in my humble. That would leave money as a key determinant of the outcome.
BlazingDynamo wrote: »I asked if other servers were experiencing similar issues.
They are TRADE GUILDS, making gold is the point of their existence, they should not be penalized for being successful.
If the gold they make plays no part in securing a trader what should?
sudaki_eso wrote: »BlazingDynamo wrote: »I asked if other servers were experiencing similar issues.
No. Any other questions?