Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Don't incorporate bugs into your builds, and you won't have [an] issue.
Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
MojaveHeld wrote: »For PvE tanks who are vampires, the undeath passive is one of the best parts. Vamp tanks pretty much always stay in stage 4.
^Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
To those suggesting the extra fire damage taken is a non-issue all I can say is... ha ha.
^Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
To those suggesting the extra fire damage taken is a non-issue all I can say is... ha ha.
It is ... being a Dark Elf.
^Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
To those suggesting the extra fire damage taken is a non-issue all I can say is... ha ha.
It is ... being a Dark Elf.
^Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
To those suggesting the extra fire damage taken is a non-issue all I can say is... ha ha.
It is ... being a Dark Elf.
I'm skeptical. But admittedly I've never played as a dark elf to test this out for myself.
Everyone knows that you gain a minimum of 30% of your DPS from having a character that looks good.
Good looking Imperial :130% DPS
Average looking Imperial: 100% DPS
Bad looking Imperial: 70% DPS
Any Khajiit: 50% DPS
Stage 1: 90%
Stage 2: 80%
Stage 3: 70%
Stage 4: 50%
If you have to play a vampire, then make it a gorgeous Imperial and stay at stage 1 for 120% DPS!
^Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
To those suggesting the extra fire damage taken is a non-issue all I can say is... ha ha.
It is ... being a Dark Elf.^Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
To those suggesting the extra fire damage taken is a non-issue all I can say is... ha ha.
It is ... being a Dark Elf.
I'm skeptical. But admittedly I've never played as a dark elf to test this out for myself.
Ehm.. Dark elf Stamblade here. That passive equals around %3 mitigation so in other words, OMEGALOL.
Elwendryll wrote: »Everyone knows that you gain a minimum of 30% of your DPS from having a character that looks good.
Good looking Imperial :130% DPS
Average looking Imperial: 100% DPS
Bad looking Imperial: 70% DPS
Any Khajiit: 50% DPS
Stage 1: 90%
Stage 2: 80%
Stage 3: 70%
Stage 4: 50%
If you have to play a vampire, then make it a gorgeous Imperial and stay at stage 1 for 120% DPS!
All this time I've been actually doing 80k dps but it was just because I was playing khajiit, thanks for enlightening me!
I mean, the skin from vSP covers the looks superbly. Fire damage is another 25% at stage 4, which is a bummer, but u know, when there is no fire damage it is neglectable, when the fire damage is small, it is neglectable. When the fire damage will be coming from everywhere, u can always just drink some bloody mara (120 gold~ to reduce to stage 1, just repair costs from not dying cover that)
sudaki_eso wrote: »
MojaveHeld wrote: »For PvE tanks who are vampires, the undeath passive is one of the best parts. Vamp tanks pretty much always stay in stage 4.
I disagree. My tank is much better off in PvE not taking 25% increased fire damage than he is sporting that undeath passive. In fact - I would highly recommend any Vampire tanks feed to stage one before doing any difficult PvE content that involves nasty fire damage. It's not pretty what it does to you.
Maybe i'm missing something (likely) but I don't see a lot of upside of going to stage 3 or 4 vampirism. All you gain is reduced vampire ability costs, do people even use these in pve?
To me it makes sense to stay in stage 2 to get the recovery.
I feel like I am missing something, please enlighten me
Thanks!
To be honest, for PvE there is a good argument to be made it's not even worth it to get stage 2. Stage 4 I'd say is a bad deal for PvE all around. Nightblade is really the only class that can significantly benefit from stage 4 vampire in my opinion - since they are an ideal stealth class.
To those suggesting the extra fire damage taken is a non-issue all I can say is... ha ha.