Wrong mundus for a raid group though. Nice to show what nearly full spell pen can do however.
Would like to see you test with a different mundus - mage, thief.
Transairion wrote: »Nice dummy test for sure, but I wouldn't call 13k HP (with +HP food mind you) and no Ward/shield a terribly realistic build. I am a scrub for sure but my MagDK only has around that level of HP and I feel like paper when shields are down
In theory while PTS Twilight Tormentor is bugged (the +50% damage active isn't working?) the Matriach will put out the same DPS while having a heal, and even when fixed Tormentor's damage boost only works for half an encounter so I don't consider it worth slotting yet: it's certainly better than before at least where it had nothing going for it at all.
validifyedneb18_ESO wrote: »Holy moly those heavy attacks.
Would be interesting to see the magic in out
MLGProPlayer wrote: »This is one of the reasons why petsorcs shouldn't have competitive DPS to the very top heavy hitters. They are just too easy to play.
Other classes (and sorc builds) need to work their asses off for comparable numbers.
themaddaedra wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »This is one of the reasons why petsorcs shouldn't have competitive DPS to the very top heavy hitters. They are just too easy to play.
Other classes (and sorc builds) need to work their asses off for comparable numbers.
That’s the most ridiculous cliche ESO has seen over years. It's something only those who have no idea would say.
I've been part of hardcore raiding in ESO for years, played stamblade, magblade, petsorc, non-pet sorc, stamplar, magplar and healer. Petsorc is not easier than any other. It sometimes is even harder with the movement disadvantage while heavy attacking.
Also, just by looking at petsorc numbers in endgame you can say that cliche is not correct. If it had any, i mean any advantage over others people would run it. Meta is no joke.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »themaddaedra wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »This is one of the reasons why petsorcs shouldn't have competitive DPS to the very top heavy hitters. They are just too easy to play.
Other classes (and sorc builds) need to work their asses off for comparable numbers.
That’s the most ridiculous cliche ESO has seen over years. It's something only those who have no idea would say.
I've been part of hardcore raiding in ESO for years, played stamblade, magblade, petsorc, non-pet sorc, stamplar, magplar and healer. Petsorc is not easier than any other. It sometimes is even harder with the movement disadvantage while heavy attacking.
Also, just by looking at petsorc numbers in endgame you can say that cliche is not correct. If it had any, i mean any advantage over others people would run it. Meta is no joke.
Petsorcs were all the rage when they were top DPS. Endgame will always run top DPS, not easiest DPS.
I'm just saying that petsorc shouldn't be top DPS because it's significantly easier to play than other builds.
I'd start with Zaan being not overly realistic in most scenarios...
themaddaedra wrote: »I'm having big troubles swapping bars and dropping LL on PTS due to ping but managed to do a rather proper test on Altmer:
Tried to make some tests with Khajiit as well but got tired after quite some attempts. But Altmer looks slightly better atm.
Also want to try Breton and gold food for LA build but can't make it before live.
Thanks for posting this, @codestripper. I only have one character and it's an altmer Pet Sorc. For a long time I couldn't break 25k DPS self-buffed. I followed guides and I was able to eventually push 30k.
In the last month or so, playing around with gear, CP and sets I've managed to push around 37 - 38k self-buffed with a very similar set-up to your (I have a backbar vMA inferno staff - the lightning one eludes me). I found that Necropotence and Mother's Sorrow have been the best combination for me by far.
I appreciate you posting your build; it's great to see that the ceiling for damage is limited by my own skill and it's great to see what's possible. If you have any additional tips on how you managed to start breaking 40k and above, I'd love to hear them.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »themaddaedra wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »This is one of the reasons why petsorcs shouldn't have competitive DPS to the very top heavy hitters. They are just too easy to play.
Other classes (and sorc builds) need to work their asses off for comparable numbers.
That’s the most ridiculous cliche ESO has seen over years. It's something only those who have no idea would say.
I've been part of hardcore raiding in ESO for years, played stamblade, magblade, petsorc, non-pet sorc, stamplar, magplar and healer. Petsorc is not easier than any other. It sometimes is even harder with the movement disadvantage while heavy attacking.
Also, just by looking at petsorc numbers in endgame you can say that cliche is not correct. If it had any, i mean any advantage over others people would run it. Meta is no joke.
Petsorcs were all the rage when they were top DPS. Endgame will always run top DPS, not easiest DPS.
I'm just saying that petsorc shouldn't be top DPS because it's significantly easier to play than other builds. I'm not saying they;re top right now. I think being like 1-2k behind the top is good for balance.
codestripper wrote: »themaddaedra wrote: »I'm having big troubles swapping bars and dropping LL on PTS due to ping but managed to do a rather proper test on Altmer:
Tried to make some tests with Khajiit as well but got tired after quite some attempts. But Altmer looks slightly better atm.
Also want to try Breton and gold food for LA build but can't make it before live.
This is the highest I've been able to get on khajiit, albeit with the lover still but:
codestripper wrote: »I'm not saying that these are the best rotations on the market but they sure work for me just fine.
What kind of Cp setup are you running? I run the same gear aside from zaan. Our stats are virtually the same except I run thief and have a bit more crit and a bit less pen. Have looked at 4 or 5 other parse vids running the exact same gear as me with virtually same stats. What I see in my parse though is that my average damage on abilities is always significantly lower than what you and others have. Light attacks are obvious as I am stuck on the last boss in vet maelstrom, but all the others I am always 10 to 20 percent lower on average hit, even when my crits are landing at a higher rate than what I am seeing in screenshots and videos. Is there anything other than CP that I am missing that can make this difference? Not even looking at dps yet and tidying up rotation. No point when I am on average hitting 10 to 20 percent less per attack, need to fix that first.
codestripper wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »themaddaedra wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »This is one of the reasons why petsorcs shouldn't have competitive DPS to the very top heavy hitters. They are just too easy to play.
Other classes (and sorc builds) need to work their asses off for comparable numbers.
That’s the most ridiculous cliche ESO has seen over years. It's something only those who have no idea would say.
I've been part of hardcore raiding in ESO for years, played stamblade, magblade, petsorc, non-pet sorc, stamplar, magplar and healer. Petsorc is not easier than any other. It sometimes is even harder with the movement disadvantage while heavy attacking.
Also, just by looking at petsorc numbers in endgame you can say that cliche is not correct. If it had any, i mean any advantage over others people would run it. Meta is no joke.
Petsorcs were all the rage when they were top DPS. Endgame will always run top DPS, not easiest DPS.
I'm just saying that petsorc shouldn't be top DPS because it's significantly easier to play than other builds. I'm not saying they;re top right now. I think being like 1-2k behind the top is good for balance.
I'd just like to point out one thing, in order to get this high of DPS in the first place we as pet sorcs need to sacrifice our shields an healing (besides the matriarch). So.....yeah no I'd say it's more than balanced. In most trial content I can get away with only running the bird, but sometimes I'll need to swap in a shield or power surge. Every other class has the ability to heal / shield and do higher damage. If you ask me we're still not at the level we should be, but very close to it.
In terms of "too easy to play" please feel free to post your pet sorc parses here for us so we can see how easy it is to play, It's not like I've spent weeks putting in time and effort to research the build and practice rotations or anything...Not to mention this is a dynamic rotation much like nightblades have with our crystal frags proc, If anything I would consider most other classes to be much easier as they also don't have to worry about controlling their pets.
In order to play a pet sorc at a high level and to score push it takes much more effort than most classes, go see for yourself if you don't believe me. I just do it because I have fun with it.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »themaddaedra wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »This is one of the reasons why petsorcs shouldn't have competitive DPS to the very top heavy hitters. They are just too easy to play.
Other classes (and sorc builds) need to work their asses off for comparable numbers.
That’s the most ridiculous cliche ESO has seen over years. It's something only those who have no idea would say.
I've been part of hardcore raiding in ESO for years, played stamblade, magblade, petsorc, non-pet sorc, stamplar, magplar and healer. Petsorc is not easier than any other. It sometimes is even harder with the movement disadvantage while heavy attacking.
Also, just by looking at petsorc numbers in endgame you can say that cliche is not correct. If it had any, i mean any advantage over others people would run it. Meta is no joke.
Petsorcs were all the rage when they were top DPS. Endgame will always run top DPS, not easiest DPS.
I'm just saying that petsorc shouldn't be top DPS because it's significantly easier to play than other builds. I'm not saying they;re top right now. I think being like 1-2k behind the top is good for balance.
I don't really understand the notion of easy vs hard rotations and why easy rotations should do less dps. This came up during the werewolf pts as well and the only argument I heard was from... delicate people feeling offended that werewolves were in range of their tendinitus inducing NB rotations. I don't get it, are you worried there wont be enough barriers to keep 'lesser' players from getting the same achievements as you? Because thats what boss mechanics are for, an easy rotation doesn't make the twins or st olms any easier it just allows people with high ping, disabilities or bad computers to get similar damage. Easy rotations dont lower the skill floor of the game or take away from your commitment to muscle memory they just increase accessability and promote diversity in the game. I guess I just dont understand the delicate pride behind dps parses. Parses don't beat content, skill and teamwork does and those are qualities people should take pride in showing off... ideally with their shiny new pet sorc overlords!
I don't really understand the notion of easy vs hard rotations and why easy rotations should do less dps. This came up during the werewolf pts as well and the only argument I heard was from... delicate people feeling offended that werewolves were in range of their tendinitus inducing NB rotations. I don't get it, are you worried there wont be enough barriers to keep 'lesser' players from getting the same achievements as you? Because thats what boss mechanics are for, an easy rotation doesn't make the twins or st olms any easier it just allows people with high ping, disabilities or bad computers to get similar damage. Easy rotations dont lower the skill floor of the game or take away from your commitment to muscle memory they just increase accessability and promote diversity in the game. I guess I just dont understand the delicate pride behind dps parses. Parses don't beat content, skill and teamwork does and those are qualities people should take pride in showing off... ideally with their shiny new pet sorc overlords!
Oh come on. Yeah you do, we all know why the infamous e-peen is so important to some people, we're just polite enough not to talk about it in public.