hmsdragonfly wrote: »She looks like you take the default Redguard model and slap the crownstore outfit on her.
I guess it's because of small indie company?
You cant say that she was done without efforts. In TES she looks like woman in specific dress. And we got this dress in crown store, so obviously she was done as generic woman with this dress.
It is game engine that not allow to make it look as attractive as you want.
For example compare how things looks on game engine and art:
AlmalexiaHow she in ESO:
And compare to Legends art:
Or Golden Saint:How it look in ESO (not completely her, but npc look similar to ordinary race, only gear is different):
And compare to Legends art:
Difference is drastical and its not developers to blame about it.
hmsdragonfly wrote: »You cant say that she was done without efforts. In TES she looks like woman in specific dress. And we got this dress in crown store, so obviously she was done as generic woman with this dress.
It is game engine that not allow to make it look as attractive as you want.
For example compare how things looks on game engine and art:
AlmalexiaHow she in ESO:
And compare to Legends art:
Or Golden Saint:How it look in ESO (not completely her, but npc look similar to ordinary race, only gear is different):
And compare to Legends art:
Difference is drastical and its not developers to blame about it.
Mephala looks good:
Why can't Nocturnal? Of course it's not the engine's fault here, we all know that, there's no point blaming the engine here when clearly you can make custom character with this engine as a matter of fact.
It's not about making her look as good as in the concept art, with the decision of taking the default Redguard model and slapping a crownstore custome on her, she looks bland and boring in the concept herself.
hmsdragonfly wrote: »You cant say that she was done without efforts. In TES she looks like woman in specific dress. And we got this dress in crown store, so obviously she was done as generic woman with this dress.
It is game engine that not allow to make it look as attractive as you want.
For example compare how things looks on game engine and art:
AlmalexiaHow she in ESO:
And compare to Legends art:
Or Golden Saint:How it look in ESO (not completely her, but npc look similar to ordinary race, only gear is different):
And compare to Legends art:
Difference is drastical and its not developers to blame about it.
Mephala looks good:
Why can't Nocturnal? Of course it's not the engine's fault here, we all know that, there's no point blaming the engine here when clearly you can make custom character with this engine as a matter of fact.
It's not about making her look as good as in the concept art, with the decision of taking the default Redguard model and slapping a crownstore custome on her, she looks bland and boring in the concept herself.
She looks like dunmer woman with bright eyes in special outfit and spider legs, i.e. like her statue does, same as Nocturnal.
But Mephala indeed looks much cooler coz her basic concept is cool, unlike Nocturnal who is just half nude female.
You cant say that she was done without efforts. In TES she looks like woman in specific dress. And we got this dress in crown store, so obviously she was done as generic woman with this dress.
It is game engine that not allow to make it look as attractive as you want, you have to use imagination.
For example compare how things looks on game engine and art:
Almalexia in eso and with artistic imagination in LegendsHow she in ESO:
And compare to Legends art:
Or Golden Saint:How it look in ESO (not completely her, but npc look similar to ordinary race, only gear is different):
And compare to Legends art:
Difference is drastical and its not developers to blame about it.
themaddaedra wrote: »Well that picture you got is one of Nocturnal's three appearances. Tho i agree it's bit disappointing, it seems better in this one?
SilverIce58 wrote: »themaddaedra wrote: »Well that picture you got is one of Nocturnal's three appearances. Tho i agree it's bit disappointing, it seems better in this one?
That's really worse tbh. The closer it gets, the worse it gets.
hmsdragonfly wrote: »hmsdragonfly wrote: »You cant say that she was done without efforts. In TES she looks like woman in specific dress. And we got this dress in crown store, so obviously she was done as generic woman with this dress.
It is game engine that not allow to make it look as attractive as you want.
For example compare how things looks on game engine and art:
AlmalexiaHow she in ESO:
And compare to Legends art:
Or Golden Saint:How it look in ESO (not completely her, but npc look similar to ordinary race, only gear is different):
And compare to Legends art:
Difference is drastical and its not developers to blame about it.
Mephala looks good:
Why can't Nocturnal? Of course it's not the engine's fault here, we all know that, there's no point blaming the engine here when clearly you can make custom character with this engine as a matter of fact.
It's not about making her look as good as in the concept art, with the decision of taking the default Redguard model and slapping a crownstore custome on her, she looks bland and boring in the concept herself.
She looks like dunmer woman with bright eyes in special outfit and spider legs, i.e. like her statue does, same as Nocturnal.
But Mephala indeed looks much cooler coz her basic concept is cool, unlike Nocturnal who is just half nude female.
Almalexia is a Dark Elf so ofcourse she looks like a Dark Elf. Should a Dark Elf look like a Breton instead? I think not.
Even so Almalexia has a special outfit. Does Nocturnal? No she doesn't. Nocturnal's character model is just a default Redguard woman character model, and she has a crownstore costume on her. So much for a Daedric Prince. I guess I can slap that crownstore costume on my Redguard character and tadaaaaa I am Nocturnal. This is pathetic actually.
themaddaedra wrote: »Well that picture you got is one of Nocturnal's three appearances. Tho i agree it's bit disappointing, it seems better in this one?
themaddaedra wrote: »SilverIce58 wrote: »themaddaedra wrote: »Well that picture you got is one of Nocturnal's three appearances. Tho i agree it's bit disappointing, it seems better in this one?
That's really worse tbh. The closer it gets, the worse it gets.
I'm guessing it could be the gloam itself that bothers you all then. Leythen also looked way worse than original after getting gloamed.
Not sure if we could see Nocturnal without the gloam tho, it's what she's all about.