Is the reason "this is what I see when I close my eyes and imagine" not good enough?Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Give me a reason to choose one class over another.
I disagree. Both PVE and PVP players expressed extreme dissatisfaction about the changes in 3.0 that made class identities less distinct.My intention in having you guys select wether you play PVP or PVE is as follows: I believe that the majority of PVE-players want role Diversity while the other way arround the majority of PVP-players want class identity.
I disagree. Both PVE and PVP players expressed extreme dissatisfaction about the changes in 3.0 that made class identities less distinct.My intention in having you guys select wether you play PVP or PVE is as follows: I believe that the majority of PVE-players want role Diversity while the other way arround the majority of PVP-players want class identity.
I've always been baffled at why some feel tank and healer archetype classes should deal damage as well as a dps class. I have never expected or wanted my Nightblades to heal as well as Templar or tank as well as a DK.
This game is extremely alt-friendly. Keep class identities intact and let players roll alts for different roles.
If diversity means that all classes should be equally good at all aspects of the game, then I ´d rather have class identity.
My intention in having you guys select wether you play PVP or PVE is as follows: I believe that the majority of PVE-players want role Diversity while the other way arround the majority of PVP-players want class identity.
Both have solid reasons for their opinions and IMO thats where the difficulty in this game is burrowed, there are roughly 2 Playerbases (yeah i know there are traders and roleplayers and maybe even bards, and thats fine, they have a right to be there) and these 2 playerbases have strongly separating opinions on how this game should be.
What about those (like myself) that play both PvE and PvP interchangeably?
I, personally, want strong class identity... and revert to nerfs to class signature abilities (within reason.)
What about those (like myself) that play both PvE and PvP interchangeably?
I, personally, want strong class identity... and revert to nerfs to class signature abilities (within reason.)
The OP does not know how to gather statistics.
You ask people with unopinionated and free choices first, you segment the results afterwards.
Only doing so, you have a faithful representation of what people truly believe.
Instead he segmented the results based on his own bias and then forces people to corral into one of his pre-made trails of thought.
You can, unless you're going for top rankings in leaderboads in PvE or trying to be the best 1vX player in the game.I'm sick and tired of every class turning into a mag spell thrower or a stam dual wielder... Because nothing else can do very well from lv 1 to lv 50 and onwards...
Why the hell does this game even have an option to place health stats if by the end its meaningless... Why can't i play a mage assassin bosmer or a mage orc..
Races ruined ESO imo..
So honestly have no idea which to pick poll wise but this games skills need an overhaul to some thing other than stam or mag...
We just need to find ways for each class to achieve the same things via different means..
You can, unless you're going for top rankings in leaderboads in PvE or trying to be the best 1vX player in the game.I'm sick and tired of every class turning into a mag spell thrower or a stam dual wielder... Because nothing else can do very well from lv 1 to lv 50 and onwards...
Why the hell does this game even have an option to place health stats if by the end its meaningless... Why can't i play a mage assassin bosmer or a mage orc..
Races ruined ESO imo..
So honestly have no idea which to pick poll wise but this games skills need an overhaul to some thing other than stam or mag...
I have played and continue to play with unoptimised players and they can clear content fine, player skill is way more important than any racial passives.