i disagree with all the people pointing to skyrim and saying "there's your offline game". untill i went to college i had terrible internet, but there was only one ISP that would provide to my house and only one available internet package, some days the internet worked just fine but on other days you couldn't even log on, or if you could log on the lag made the game completely unplayable. so on those days what did i do, simple i played Morrowind up to the 500 hour mark, i play Oblivion to the 300 hour mark, and i play Skyrim to the 350 hour mark (all rounded but you get the point). once i had exhaised those there were days where my internet still wouldnt work and i longed for some fresh elder scrolls, and with no ES VI being announced all i had was an unplayable version of ESO, i had tamriel at my fingertips, and i would long to log in and enjoy the world, but i couldn't, and there was nothing i could do about it.
yes, i get the fact that it is an MMO and its supposed to be online, and is best played online, and i do not have any solutions. but, i just wanted to say that saying "go play skyrim" is not a valid argument against people with bad internet, if they want to play an ES game that bad, they have more than likely seen everything skyrim has to offer, maybe ever a few times over.
in other words saying "go play Skyrim, Oblivion, Morrowind" isnt (at least in my eyes) a valid point in this discussion.
There is so much fundamentally wrong here. I didn't have internet for years and not once during that time did I expect a game company to cater an online game to me. If you have terrible internet, do not buy an online game.
Also, as someone who put in at least 600+ hours into Skyrim (and probably an equal amount into Oblivion), there is always more to see and do in it. And more ways to experience the game.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Sorry but why buy an 100% Online game if you have what you consider is bad internet?
Outside of that, I wouldn’t be against an offline mode but that offline mode should mean just a character copy of your last online that can’t copy back to online.
That’s the only way that could work on this game...or maybe while online you’re playing alone in a solo mode that is less of a connection bandwidth requirement.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »How about they fix the lag. I love this game but it is basically unplayable. There is a 30 second to 3 minute delay every time I go through a load screen. From the time I press the icon on my desktop until the time I can do anything in game can be up to 20 minutes. That is unacceptable in 2017. I play other MMOs like SWTOR, SWL and Revelation Online and they are perfectly fine so it is not me, it is ESO.
I don't think you understand the concept of lag... Your issues would probably be cleared up by getting an SSD drive...
Also...ZoS would have to put up a lot of $$$, to reconfigure the game to have 2 different "modes" for a sparse minority, who will probably quit the game after they complete the content ...so yeah...not happening...
For arguments sake ...I don’t think it would take a lot of money. It’s just settings changes so that the game would host itself locally however it would have to always be off the main server but some form of internet would seem to be required as those who want this also seem to want to updates and changes too.
disintegr8 wrote: »While there are some valid comments in this thread, there are a lot of comments that confirm the view that he have a somewhat toxic forum. There is no need to ridicule someone for posting a suggestion/request. Sarcasm does not prove intelligence - asking how you PVP in offline mode was not even worth typing.
A simple solution to the opening posters request would be for ZOS to put out a version of ESO - regardless of what they call it - that is played offline, in single player mode and Skyrim is not it. Skyrim has not had anything new added to it for years and most people who have played through the ES series will tell you that Skyrim was rubbish not a true ES game.
Maybe you could copy existing characters from ESO to the offline game, but you could never copy them back. It would not have all of the functionality of ESO (naturally) but it could be something that appeals to a certain type of person, or people in certain geographical, economic or social situations where access to the internet, or interaction with other people, might be restricted.
I believe there might be a market for ZOS to look at here.
well, my internet isnt satellite or cable, its wireless though. it took me 5 days to download the game
MythicEmperor wrote: »there is an offline version. in fact there are 2. oblivion and skyrim.
you do understand what an MMO is right?
To be fair, your statement doesn't hold up to scrutiny. ESO is a vastly different game than the single player series. It has its own stories to tell, its own quests, its own combat system, its own aesthetic; the game is fundamentally different. You might as well tell someone waiting for TES 6 to play Warcraft 3. To compare ESO to the single player games is unfair.
The OP's request wouldn't hurt anyone. Some people have bad wifi, yet they love TES and want to experience all the stories you can take part in. Can you really blame them?
to be fair, you're talking like a massively multiplayer ONLINE - OFFLINE is a thing. i hate to break it to you, its NOT. just kidding, i love breaking news like that to people.
cant wait to see how they do a 4man dungeon
kypranb14_ESO wrote: »
Doing most 4 man dungeons solo is easy, even many of the veteran dungeons can be done solo. I'm not advocating for an offline mode, but the difficulty of the game goes out the window when you have good gear+skill.
SinfulPrinc3ss wrote: »Define bad internet? I live in an area where satillite is the only option so we rely on our mobile hotspots which gets me roughly 3 to 9mbps speeds...i have no problem with any content personally...typical cyrodiil lag (had 60mbps cable before moving so i can compare) same frame rate issues.
well, my internet isnt satellite or cable, its wireless though. it took me 5 days to download the game
SinfulPrinc3ss wrote: »SinfulPrinc3ss wrote: »Define bad internet? I live in an area where satillite is the only option so we rely on our mobile hotspots which gets me roughly 3 to 9mbps speeds...i have no problem with any content personally...typical cyrodiil lag (had 60mbps cable before moving so i can compare) same frame rate issues.
well, my internet isnt satellite or cable, its wireless though. it took me 5 days to download the game
I cant do that we are allotted 10 gigs of data per device and have 3 devices. Needless to say for downloads over a gig we take the xboxs to a friends house lol
MercTheMage wrote: »@BirdMe Could you define crappy internet plz?
SinfulPrinc3ss wrote: »SinfulPrinc3ss wrote: »Define bad internet? I live in an area where satillite is the only option so we rely on our mobile hotspots which gets me roughly 3 to 9mbps speeds...i have no problem with any content personally...typical cyrodiil lag (had 60mbps cable before moving so i can compare) same frame rate issues.
well, my internet isnt satellite or cable, its wireless though. it took me 5 days to download the game
I cant do that we are allotted 10 gigs of data per device and have 3 devices. Needless to say for downloads over a gig we take the xboxs to a friends house lol
Yes, the struggle is real. Unfortunately there are people on this forum who live in a bubble and seem to have trouble understanding that not everybody has the same standard of living as they do. It's a waste of time trying to tell them, like trying to reason with a drunk.
There are a lot of people answering in this thread who don't seem to understand that not everyone uses fibre internet, nor has access to it and probably never will. We struggle along with old, inferior copper or congested rural wireless.
Such is life.
HighKinlady wrote: »Will there be unusually long load screens in the offline version ? Asking for a friend .
I agree with the OP. I personally do not think any arguments made against this are valid. I'm not sure if it's mob mentality but I don't see how it's a bad idea. I don't think it will happen (at least not with ESO) but nonetheless I think an offline RPG as expensive as ESO with story and collectibles would be awesome.
As far as arguments against the OP's suggestion go; I don't see how the 'What about group dungeons?' 'What about PvP?' are helpful. It would be common sense to assume the OP isn't asking for online reliant features to be available offline. When it comes to Skyrim or other TES games being suggested as an offline replacement I think they are apples and oranges. ESO is not Skyrim. There are similarities but I don't think they're comparable as a whole within reason. That and the fact that I am quite certain anyone wishing for and offline ESO game has already either played other TES games until they are dead or are not interested in them due to the different gameplay mechanics.
ESO has many amazing features and a large world to explore- many of the adventures you can do solo without any issues. From loot drops to dungeons- it isn't required that you interact with other players or purchase from the guild traders to level up for progress (even though interaction with other players or making use of online functionalities may be advantageous) I think it's easy to see why someone would want to be part of this and how they may feel held back from the experience of ESO many of us with secure internet (including myself) can take for granted.
A massive open world like this with all the side quests in the gameplay style of ESO would be amazing. That and the graphics are beautiful as well. There is plenty of content and so many different experiences to be had.
TL;DR
I don't believe ESO will ever be offline but I do think an offline game that plays the same way, with the same quantity and quality of content that ESO delivers, would be fantastic.