AoDD33pfri3d wrote: »
Agree, there should be 0 tolerance.
lordrichter wrote: »AoDD33pfri3d wrote: »
Agree, there should be 0 tolerance.
The problem with Zero Tolerance is that such policies are designed to solve problems by removing decisions from the flawed people who hand out the punishments. They give a false sense of security to the general population because they think that it solves whatever problems they have, but it just creates new ones. It is a nightmare for the person who gets caught up in it unjustly.
The reason I like to allow suspensions over permanent bans for player personal gain cheating is that it allows the judge to determine whether the punishment is appropriate to the crime and the player. It allows the suspended party to modify future behavior. If a mistake is made, it is only temporary.
In the case of "gold selling" and the associated botting, a permanent ban is appropriate. I don't classify this sort of botting and gold selling as "cheating" when done by an outside entity for the purpose of doing business. Cheating is when a player is botting for personal gain. The player should be allowed to turn it into a suspension for the first offense, but only if it can be determined that they are doing it for personal gain, not as a business activity. The first offense player should have the opportunity to correct their behavior and demonstrate this by never botting again. The gold sellers can rot in Hell.
lordrichter wrote: »AoDD33pfri3d wrote: »
Agree, there should be 0 tolerance.
The problem with Zero Tolerance is that such policies are designed to solve problems by removing decisions from the flawed people who hand out the punishments. They give a false sense of security to the general population because they think that it solves whatever problems they have, but it just creates new ones. It is a nightmare for the person who gets caught up in it unjustly.
The reason I like to allow suspensions over permanent bans for player personal gain cheating is that it allows the judge to determine whether the punishment is appropriate to the crime and the player. It allows the suspended party to modify future behavior. If a mistake is made, it is only temporary.
In the case of "gold selling" and the associated botting, a permanent ban is appropriate. I don't classify this sort of botting and gold selling as "cheating" when done by an outside entity for the purpose of doing business. Cheating is when a player is botting for personal gain. The player should be allowed to turn it into a suspension for the first offense, but only if it can be determined that they are doing it for personal gain, not as a business activity. The first offense player should have the opportunity to correct their behavior and demonstrate this by never botting again. The gold sellers can rot in Hell.
Modify future behavior by keeping ill gotten gains, nice.
I hate to break it to you but it actually is because of real money that one can earn through botting. Which can reach quite the high price. (check spoiler for a example of that)I refuse to believe that after paying the cost to run 4 pc's to bot that you could make any real money.I'm not showing the website. So dont ask.
What makes the matter worse is that @ZOS isn't doing anything towards the people who give these people money, like for example those who bought a high level toon never run into any issues once they own the account and are playing on it. It's kinda like they are approving of users who give the bots money by not giving them any punishments either.
Either way, the developers need to change the way they punish these people. The current "punishing" isn't doing anything. Especially when you consider that these people are earning alot of money doing this.
lordrichter wrote: »AoDD33pfri3d wrote: »
Agree, there should be 0 tolerance.
The problem with Zero Tolerance is that such policies are designed to solve problems by removing decisions from the flawed people who hand out the punishments. They give a false sense of security to the general population because they think that it solves whatever problems they have, but it just creates new ones. It is a nightmare for the person who gets caught up in it unjustly.
The reason I like to allow suspensions over permanent bans for player personal gain cheating is that it allows the judge to determine whether the punishment is appropriate to the crime and the player. It allows the suspended party to modify future behavior. If a mistake is made, it is only temporary.
In the case of "gold selling" and the associated botting, a permanent ban is appropriate. I don't classify this sort of botting and gold selling as "cheating" when done by an outside entity for the purpose of doing business. Cheating is when a player is botting for personal gain. The player should be allowed to turn it into a suspension for the first offense, but only if it can be determined that they are doing it for personal gain, not as a business activity. The first offense player should have the opportunity to correct their behavior and demonstrate this by never botting again. The gold sellers can rot in Hell.
Lol people really don't care for this game. Tried for years to get a grassroots anti cheat but it's always meh at best.
Attitude of player base is zos don't care we don't care
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »sirinsidiator wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hey guys,
We know that cheating players and botters takes away from your experience in the game, and also affects important aspects such as the economy or scoring. We do take this very seriously, and appreciate everyone who brings these to our attention. For the record, we are aware of the sites called out from the OP. While we can’t discuss specifics, we do our best to combat sites and programs that encourage breaking our Terms of Service.
As far as what you can do to help, telling us is the first step. If you run across someone you believe is cheating (whether it’s botting or exploiting), please report them. You can do so in-game or simply by messaging a staff member on the forums (it can be me, Jess, or any of the moderators). Keep in mind our TOS team suspends and bans botting accounts daily, and investigations are prioritized based on the number of reports received.
While this sounds nice, unfortunately I - and many others I talked to - had a different experience. A few weeks ago I reported several bots. I took the time to capture them on video and create a list of names which I sent via the ingame ticketing system. No answer.
I waited a few days and the bots are still running around.
I wrote a reply on the open ticket, pm'ed you here on the forum, asked other people to bring up the topic.
Only answer I got was a canned response on the ticket which got closed, but the bots are still running around.
In a final attempt, I brought it up in twitch chat before the previous ESO live and pm'ed the ticket number to @ZOS_RichLambert , but to this day I don't think it has been investigated as the videos have no views since I uploaded them to youtube.
Honestly, this doesn't give me the impression that you really care about getting rid of them. A simple answer like "thanks for sending us these videos, we will look into the issue" would have gone a long way, but all I got was silence or automated responses and no visible action at all after weeks. In the meantime I kicked the bots from my guild, so I can't see if they are still running around, but it would be nice if we could get an update when accounts we have reported were investigated or actioned, regardless of the outcome.
It's very possible that the original bots were removed, but these guys can simply just make a new account (and it's not uncommon for them to do so).