vamp_emily wrote: »That is just crazy, buying 1000 crates to get a mount. I really wish some kind of origination would look into this kind of trashy scram that gaming companies are doing.
If i had that kind of money to throw away I would have just bought stock in amazon or google and let it ride.
I personally didn't even care about the free crates during the last event. I ended up getting 2 because I killed 2 trial bosses other than that I just played PvP.
Peekachu99 wrote: »1130ish, actually, give or take a few. The dollar cost can be reasonably extracted from that data, though I had 30K crowns left over from the sale.
Before the usual guffaws and ridicule, a couple of things to note: I had a surplus of disposable income from my tax returns, I am generally in a healthy financial position, I regularly contribute to charities and lend my time at a soup kitchen on Christmas (though in all honesty missed last year), and I am aware of the perils and payouts of gambling (which these crates are and should therefor be subject to the same laws as are found in China now).
Anyway, I had the money and my life-commitments were all taken care of (home, family, food and shelter), so I decided to go full Moby *** and grab that elusive "rare" apex mount: the Plague Husk Horse. Needless to say, I acquired every single item on the list but that mount. Do I find it strange that a number of low CP players with gibberish names were running around the capital cities with their glowing ghastly mount on the free crate day? Indeed, the cynic in me wonders what tactics are in play behind the scenes, and if/ how accounts are treated differently based on spending (spend less, here's a cool mount to incentivize you to spend more). The truth is, we really know nothing about how these crates work, and the crate-logger, while a great addon, doesn't factor in the unseen variables that can be adjusted upon a whim without our knowing.
Am I defeated? Not really, though I will never whale in this game or spend a cent on crates again, I can tell you that. Apparently my catastrophic unluckiness (and a missing crate, which just opened, hung the screen and gave me nothing) was worthy of further escalation and investigation by whatever team handles these things, though that email exchange was days ago and I haven't heard a peep from support since (nor do I expect to). The moral of the story, and what everyone should learn is that your chances of obtaining the super rare mounts are a.) entirely minuscule and random b.) influenced by factors outside your control.
You're better off taking your three free crates each season and being happy with what you're given. Crowns are certainly better spent on items you are guaranteed to receive. I guess the one positive is that I now have enough gems to purchase anything and everything I could ever want from the crates for the next two years or longer (no-chance-in-Hell mounts and glowing sweetrolls notwithstanding.)
And, importantly, I have a cautionary tale to share with the community.
P.S. I think that in moving forward, ZoS and the community should look toward the mechanisms present in most decent gatcha games: cost triggers whereby something rare is simply given; hugely expensive costs for the "rare" apex mounts, something. As it is the relationship between these crates and the consumer is hostile to toxic, and the general attitude toward them worsens each season, which in turn makes ZoS up the ante, perpetuating a cycle of repulsion. Warframe, GranBlue Fantasy, Overwatch...There are many examples of better cosmetic cash shop boxes to follow.
Winning money vs winning microtransactions. You have a 100% chance of losing money with con crates, with an added high probably of not getting what you want. Gambling at a casino naturally isn’t “good,” but this is worse. And I wasn’t calling you an idiot, even though that may have been mistakenly implied. I call that other guy an idiot because he was blaming ZOS for “tricking” him into thinking he’d win. However, this decision? Incredibly dumb. Like I said, these crate exclusive mounts are designed for you to not get one. It’s an exploitative, disgusting system and I just don’t get why people continuously give ZOS more incentive to continue this atrocious business model.Peekachu99 wrote: »
Here we go again; it’s always someone. Are you at least aware of how absurd it is for you to spend that much money gambling on microtransactions? Or are you delusional and think this is perfectly reasonable? I mean did you not see the topic from that other idiot that did this exact same thing for the Adamant Horse and didn’t get it? Those mounts are designed for you to not get them. At the very least, you managed to fill their quota of getting at least one person to do this every season.
How is this any more absurd than gambling at a casino? I’ve done that a couple of times and I go in with a set amount and no expectations of winning anything. Keep your value judgements and calling of people “idiots” to yourself. I’m not asking for pity, merely sharing my experience with the community.
Peekachu99 wrote: »1130ish, actually, give or take a few. The dollar cost can be reasonably extracted from that data, though I had 30K crowns left over from the sale.
Before the usual guffaws and ridicule, a couple of things to note: I had a surplus of disposable income from my tax returns, I am generally in a healthy financial position, I regularly contribute to charities and lend my time at a soup kitchen on Christmas (though in all honesty missed last year), and I am aware of the perils and payouts of gambling (which these crates are and should therefor be subject to the same laws as are found in China now).
Anyway, I had the money and my life-commitments were all taken care of (home, family, food and shelter), so I decided to go full Moby *** and grab that elusive "rare" apex mount: the Plague Husk Horse. Needless to say, I acquired every single item on the list but that mount. Do I find it strange that a number of low CP players with gibberish names were running around the capital cities with their glowing ghastly mount on the free crate day? Indeed, the cynic in me wonders what tactics are in play behind the scenes, and if/ how accounts are treated differently based on spending (spend less, here's a cool mount to incentivize you to spend more). The truth is, we really know nothing about how these crates work, and the crate-logger, while a great addon, doesn't factor in the unseen variables that can be adjusted upon a whim without our knowing.
Am I defeated? Not really, though I will never whale in this game or spend a cent on crates again, I can tell you that. Apparently my catastrophic unluckiness (and a missing crate, which just opened, hung the screen and gave me nothing) was worthy of further escalation and investigation by whatever team handles these things, though that email exchange was days ago and I haven't heard a peep from support since (nor do I expect to). The moral of the story, and what everyone should learn is that your chances of obtaining the super rare mounts are a.) entirely minuscule and random b.) influenced by factors outside your control.
You're better off taking your three free crates each season and being happy with what you're given. Crowns are certainly better spent on items you are guaranteed to receive. I guess the one positive is that I now have enough gems to purchase anything and everything I could ever want from the crates for the next two years or longer (no-chance-in-Hell mounts and glowing sweetrolls notwithstanding.)
And, importantly, I have a cautionary tale to share with the community.
P.S. I think that in moving forward, ZoS and the community should look toward the mechanisms present in most decent gatcha games: cost triggers whereby something rare is simply given; hugely expensive costs for the "rare" apex mounts, something. As it is the relationship between these crates and the consumer is hostile to toxic, and the general attitude toward them worsens each season, which in turn makes ZoS up the ante, perpetuating a cycle of repulsion. Warframe, GranBlue Fantasy, Overwatch...There are many examples of better cosmetic cash shop boxes to follow.
Peekachu99 wrote: »Two working professionals, no mortgage (denied ourselves every pleasure for 5 years to double up on payments), a carry over from tax sharing (in Canada, dead circa 2014). It’s not magic or a mystery.
SydneyGrey wrote: »I thought it was suspicious there were a large number of people getting the ultra-rare mounts in their free crates, but yeah ... now that people have to pay for the crates, the rare mounts suddenly seem to be missing. I think they manipulated those odds after the free crates were handed out. It's pretty disgusting, too, because giving people better chances of getting a virtual game file literally costs them nothing.
Excluding items from being gem purchasable was a sleazy move by ZOS, but I think we're all mostly numb to their antics by now. They have no respect for their customers.
Games companies are exploiting the lack of up to date gambling laws in the industry.