ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »To explain this change a bit, we've found (through data and feedback) that the majority of players tend to flock more toward CP-enabled campaigns, so we wanted to open that same selection for Battlegrounds and will be testing it out. We’ve considered adding an option between the two as some of you have suggested, but this would cause the population to become pretty divided and we want to make sure you can join Battlegrounds quickly. All that said, if we find this option simply isn’t popular or there’s a higher preference to have Battlegrounds be non-CP, we’ll simply change it back. Thanks for all the feedback so far!
Ihatenightblades wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno
If this is just a test then offer both and base conclusions on that.
Outright switching it is effectively shutting out anyone who is not at CP cap or comfortably near it.
It's effectively shutting down the only PVP in the game that anyone can join at any time and have a chance because it's a more equal footing.
It's a bad change.
Its a bad change for YOU. What about the people who actually enjoy CP they earned like myself?
Yes CP makes people more powerful BUT THATS THE POINTTT
This isnt call of duty this is a MMORPG. Taking away the grind is taking away the game.
If they take away cp there would he NO incentive for leveling cp unless you do pve.ZOS_GinaBruno 3 minutes of your time.
Here is what FENG RUSH said about BG's
https://youtu.be/Yzoxycg53vg?t=13m48s
13min 50 seconds to 16min 50 seconds.
Pretty much sums it up!
Dude nobody cares about what one streamer thinks and how he gets destroyed in cp bg.
We the people are louder than any streamer out there and thats why @ZoS listened to us
gammelscroll wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno
If this is just a test then offer both and base conclusions on that.
Outright switching it is effectively shutting out anyone who is not at CP cap or comfortably near it.
It's effectively shutting down the only PVP in the game that anyone can join at any time and have a chance because it's a more equal footing.
It's a bad change.
Its a bad change for YOU. What about the people who actually enjoy CP they earned like myself?
Yes CP makes people more powerful BUT THATS THE POINTTT
This isnt call of duty this is a MMORPG. Taking away the grind is taking away the game.
If they take away cp there would he NO incentive for leveling cp unless you do pve.ZOS_GinaBruno 3 minutes of your time.
Here is what FENG RUSH said about BG's
https://youtu.be/Yzoxycg53vg?t=13m48s
13min 50 seconds to 16min 50 seconds.
Pretty much sums it up!
Dude nobody cares about what one streamer thinks and how he gets destroyed in cp bg.
We the people are louder than any streamer out there and thats why @ZoS listened to us
he get destroyed? he will *** on your face so u never come back to this game again
montiferus wrote: »gammelscroll wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno
If this is just a test then offer both and base conclusions on that.
Outright switching it is effectively shutting out anyone who is not at CP cap or comfortably near it.
It's effectively shutting down the only PVP in the game that anyone can join at any time and have a chance because it's a more equal footing.
It's a bad change.
Its a bad change for YOU. What about the people who actually enjoy CP they earned like myself?
Yes CP makes people more powerful BUT THATS THE POINTTT
This isnt call of duty this is a MMORPG. Taking away the grind is taking away the game.
If they take away cp there would he NO incentive for leveling cp unless you do pve.ZOS_GinaBruno 3 minutes of your time.
Here is what FENG RUSH said about BG's
https://youtu.be/Yzoxycg53vg?t=13m48s
13min 50 seconds to 16min 50 seconds.
Pretty much sums it up!
Dude nobody cares about what one streamer thinks and how he gets destroyed in cp bg.
We the people are louder than any streamer out there and thats why @ZoS listened to us
he get destroyed? he will *** on your face so u never come back to this game again
Agreed. Keep in mind too this is a guy that apparently plays on Xbox NA and will not reveal his GT. Easy to talk a lot when you hide behind the cloak of anonymity.
If I had to hazard a guess he is a nobody zergling who gets dumpstered anytime he runs into a decent player. Just ignore him. Not worth it.
vamp_emily wrote: »I've never played BG but I'm really thinking some players are not going to like this change. What is going to happen when a tank comes in and you can't kill him? You know the tank that takes 20 players doing damage before they die.
I think they should have Non CP and CP BG.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »vamp_emily wrote: »I've never played BG but I'm really thinking some players are not going to like this change. What is going to happen when a tank comes in and you can't kill him? You know the tank that takes 20 players doing damage before they die.
I think they should have Non CP and CP BG.
Na if u cant kill a tank with 4 people its you. Non cp players are so basic. There are counters to tanks its called heal debuffs poisons etc.. you need to L2P
Ihatenightblades wrote: »vamp_emily wrote: »I've never played BG but I'm really thinking some players are not going to like this change. What is going to happen when a tank comes in and you can't kill him? You know the tank that takes 20 players doing damage before they die.
I think they should have Non CP and CP BG.
Na if u cant kill a tank with 4 people its you. Non cp players are so basic. There are counters to tanks its called heal debuffs poisons etc.. you need to L2P
vamp_emily wrote: »I've never played BG but I'm really thinking some players are not going to like this change. What is going to happen when a tank comes in and you can't kill him? You know the tank that takes 20 players dealing damage before they die.
I think they should have Non CP and CP BG.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »To explain this change a bit, we've found (through data and feedback) that the majority of players tend to flock more toward CP-enabled campaigns, so we wanted to open that same selection for Battlegrounds and will be testing it out. We’ve considered adding an option between the two as some of you have suggested, but this would cause the population to become pretty divided and we want to make sure you can join Battlegrounds quickly. All that said, if we find this option simply isn’t popular or there’s a higher preference to have Battlegrounds be non-CP, we’ll simply change it back. Thanks for all the feedback so far!
CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Honestly people not playing enough is a bad justification, at least there's people playing them unlike a certain imperial dlc or maybe with that logic pvp could get scrapped because clearly there's a small amount of players in comparison to pve players.
You know this isn't about population because if it was you'd take more pride in pvp in general, this is really about squeezing some extra money out of morrowind.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Honestly people not playing enough is a bad justification, at least there's people playing them unlike a certain imperial dlc or maybe with that logic pvp could get scrapped because clearly there's a small amount of players in comparison to pve players.
You know this isn't about population because if it was you'd take more pride in pvp in general, this is really about squeezing some extra money out of morrowind.
Wrong. Players actually been wanting CP bg just because certain scrubs maybe such as yourself cant handle change doesnt mean you speak for all. This is going to increase population in Bg since now you actually use those things called champion points that we grinded for for over 2 years..
Get good and L2P bud if CP BG makes or breaks the game for you then this isnt the game for you. Back to skyrim
Ihatenightblades wrote: »CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Honestly people not playing enough is a bad justification, at least there's people playing them unlike a certain imperial dlc or maybe with that logic pvp could get scrapped because clearly there's a small amount of players in comparison to pve players.
You know this isn't about population because if it was you'd take more pride in pvp in general, this is really about squeezing some extra money out of morrowind.
Wrong. Players actually been wanting CP bg just because certain scrubs maybe such as yourself cant handle change doesnt mean you speak for all. This is going to increase population in Bg since now you actually use those things called champion points that we grinded for for over 2 years..
Get good and L2P bud if CP BG makes or breaks the game for you then this isnt the game for you. Back to skyrim
Ihatenightblades wrote: »CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Honestly people not playing enough is a bad justification, at least there's people playing them unlike a certain imperial dlc or maybe with that logic pvp could get scrapped because clearly there's a small amount of players in comparison to pve players.
You know this isn't about population because if it was you'd take more pride in pvp in general, this is really about squeezing some extra money out of morrowind.
Wrong. Players actually been wanting CP bg just because certain scrubs maybe such as yourself cant handle change doesnt mean you speak for all. This is going to increase population in Bg since now you actually use those things called champion points that we grinded for for over 2 years..
Get good and L2P bud if CP BG makes or breaks the game for you then this isnt the game for you. Back to skyrim
CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Honestly people not playing enough is a bad justification, at least there's people playing them unlike a certain imperial dlc or maybe with that logic pvp could get scrapped because clearly there's a small amount of players in comparison to pve players.
You know this isn't about population because if it was you'd take more pride in pvp in general, this is really about squeezing some extra money out of morrowind.
Wrong. Players actually been wanting CP bg just because certain scrubs maybe such as yourself cant handle change doesnt mean you speak for all. This is going to increase population in Bg since now you actually use those things called champion points that we grinded for for over 2 years..
Get good and L2P bud if CP BG makes or breaks the game for you then this isnt the game for you. Back to skyrim
Lol with OR without cp id most likely embarrass you. By all your post I can get the sense that you're someone id farm, cp isnt going to suddenly make you compete you're still going to get stomped by the player's with more BG experience. I'd gladly duel you if you think you're that great and I'm not even a dueler.
Cp isn't healthy for Bgs, as a light armored Templar with no cp I can be hard to take down, bringing even tankier setups to Bgs will be cancerous.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »CatchMeTrolling wrote: »Honestly people not playing enough is a bad justification, at least there's people playing them unlike a certain imperial dlc or maybe with that logic pvp could get scrapped because clearly there's a small amount of players in comparison to pve players.
You know this isn't about population because if it was you'd take more pride in pvp in general, this is really about squeezing some extra money out of morrowind.
Wrong. Players actually been wanting CP bg just because certain scrubs maybe such as yourself cant handle change doesnt mean you speak for all. This is going to increase population in Bg since now you actually use those things called champion points that we grinded for for over 2 years..
Get good and L2P bud if CP BG makes or breaks the game for you then this isnt the game for you. Back to skyrim
Lol with OR without cp id most likely embarrass you. By all your post I can get the sense that you're someone id farm, cp isnt going to suddenly make you compete you're still going to get stomped by the player's with more BG experience. I'd gladly duel you if you think you're that great and I'm not even a dueler.
Cp isn't healthy for Bgs, as a light armored Templar with no cp I can be hard to take down, bringing even tankier setups to Bgs will be cancerous.
light armor templar hard to take down
You have officially excused yourself from this conversation. what would be even more embarrassing than that comment you made is fighting my heavy armor stamplar and destroying you in 10-15 seconds max.
LOL light armor. Let me give you a tip for pvp since you are pretty outdated.
The ONLY class that can run medium armor and actually do good is stamblade.
And the ONLY class that can run light armor well is mag sorc.
Period.
And you say im the zergling? Lmao that says a lot im supposed to believe you do solo with a light armor magplar hahaha. Ya. Not.
You got a long ways to go my man and this is just knowing what i know about you imagine the rest of your problems lol.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »And the ONLY class that can run light armor well is mag sorc.
Period.
HEBREWHAMMERRR wrote: »Appreciate the feedback and shedding some light on this, Gina. I hope that this does gain serious consideration. The answer seems obvious with how populated the CP campaigns are vs Non CP when it comes to cyrodill. I believe that cyrodill players seem to prefer large scale fighting in large groups, whereas, smallscale players want the most challenge and competitiveness. Not to be repetitive, but the non-CP format offers the most competitive platform and in a 4v4v4 format that's what is needed to keep battlegrounds relevant. Adding CP in to battlegrounds will extremely complicate something that is an amazing feature currently. It doesn't take much research to find the unkillable builds that litter cyrodill currently, if 10 people can't kill these people, 4v4v1 won't stand much of a chance as well. It just doesn't make sense.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »To explain this change a bit, we've found (through data and feedback) that the majority of players tend to flock more toward CP-enabled campaigns, so we wanted to open that same selection for Battlegrounds and will be testing it out. We’ve considered adding an option between the two as some of you have suggested, but this would cause the population to become pretty divided and we want to make sure you can join Battlegrounds quickly. All that said, if we find this option simply isn’t popular or there’s a higher preference to have Battlegrounds be non-CP, we’ll simply change it back. Thanks for all the feedback so far!
I figured the reason for a push for all or nothing with the cp change was a population issue, that makes sense. However, I believe the pvp population in itself is pretty stagnant and aside from adding battlegrounds to the base game, I don't think this is going to drive up the numbers much, if only temporarily, maybe.
Has there been any consideration in a skill based matching / ranking system? I think this coupled with potentially better rewards would make leaps and bounds difference to increase population and could even increase Non CP PvP interest across the board.
Thanks again for the feedback. @ZOS_GinaBruno
brandonv516 wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »And the ONLY class that can run light armor well is mag sorc.
Period.
Guess you've never played magicka NB like I have then. You are very misinformed.
HEBREWHAMMERRR wrote: »Appreciate the feedback and shedding some light on this, Gina. I hope that this does gain serious consideration. The answer seems obvious with how populated the CP campaigns are vs Non CP when it comes to cyrodill. I believe that cyrodill players seem to prefer large scale fighting in large groups, whereas, smallscale players want the most challenge and competitiveness. Not to be repetitive, but the non-CP format offers the most competitive platform and in a 4v4v4 format that's what is needed to keep battlegrounds relevant. Adding CP in to battlegrounds will extremely complicate something that is an amazing feature currently. It doesn't take much research to find the unkillable builds that litter cyrodill currently, if 10 people can't kill these people, 4v4v1 won't stand much of a chance as well. It just doesn't make sense.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »To explain this change a bit, we've found (through data and feedback) that the majority of players tend to flock more toward CP-enabled campaigns, so we wanted to open that same selection for Battlegrounds and will be testing it out. We’ve considered adding an option between the two as some of you have suggested, but this would cause the population to become pretty divided and we want to make sure you can join Battlegrounds quickly. All that said, if we find this option simply isn’t popular or there’s a higher preference to have Battlegrounds be non-CP, we’ll simply change it back. Thanks for all the feedback so far!
I figured the reason for a push for all or nothing with the cp change was a population issue, that makes sense. However, I believe the pvp population in itself is pretty stagnant and aside from adding battlegrounds to the base game, I don't think this is going to drive up the numbers much, if only temporarily, maybe.
Has there been any consideration in a skill based matching / ranking system? I think this coupled with potentially better rewards would make leaps and bounds difference to increase population and could even increase Non CP PvP interest across the board.
Thanks again for the feedback. @ZOS_GinaBrunobrandonv516 wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »And the ONLY class that can run light armor well is mag sorc.
Period.
Guess you've never played magicka NB like I have then. You are very misinformed.
All magika classes can excel in light armor
Ihatenightblades wrote: »HEBREWHAMMERRR wrote: »Appreciate the feedback and shedding some light on this, Gina. I hope that this does gain serious consideration. The answer seems obvious with how populated the CP campaigns are vs Non CP when it comes to cyrodill. I believe that cyrodill players seem to prefer large scale fighting in large groups, whereas, smallscale players want the most challenge and competitiveness. Not to be repetitive, but the non-CP format offers the most competitive platform and in a 4v4v4 format that's what is needed to keep battlegrounds relevant. Adding CP in to battlegrounds will extremely complicate something that is an amazing feature currently. It doesn't take much research to find the unkillable builds that litter cyrodill currently, if 10 people can't kill these people, 4v4v1 won't stand much of a chance as well. It just doesn't make sense.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »To explain this change a bit, we've found (through data and feedback) that the majority of players tend to flock more toward CP-enabled campaigns, so we wanted to open that same selection for Battlegrounds and will be testing it out. We’ve considered adding an option between the two as some of you have suggested, but this would cause the population to become pretty divided and we want to make sure you can join Battlegrounds quickly. All that said, if we find this option simply isn’t popular or there’s a higher preference to have Battlegrounds be non-CP, we’ll simply change it back. Thanks for all the feedback so far!
I figured the reason for a push for all or nothing with the cp change was a population issue, that makes sense. However, I believe the pvp population in itself is pretty stagnant and aside from adding battlegrounds to the base game, I don't think this is going to drive up the numbers much, if only temporarily, maybe.
Has there been any consideration in a skill based matching / ranking system? I think this coupled with potentially better rewards would make leaps and bounds difference to increase population and could even increase Non CP PvP interest across the board.
Thanks again for the feedback. @ZOS_GinaBrunobrandonv516 wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »And the ONLY class that can run light armor well is mag sorc.
Period.
Guess you've never played magicka NB like I have then. You are very misinformed.
All magika classes can excel in light armor
Ya in duels. If more than 2 people ( decent players ) approach you and your in light armor? Ya your done sorry. You might be satisfied with light armor and thats fine. But elitist like myself want to be in bis gear or somewhat bis