BlueViolet wrote: »I would rather have a loyalty rewards program of some form, be it for subscribers, or even people who have been playing for years, subbers or not.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »1. Actually its a fair substitute to mandatory subscription fees. MMO's arent cheap to make or maintain. While microtransactions often sucked in other games, they aren't bad in ESO. Comparing it to Shadow of Mordor is a false equivalency.
you're getting something you would not have otherwise got with no additional cost. You are not forced to buy any crown crates yourself, and if you do so, you will get items of value or gems.Unlike in real life, you may buy a lottery ticket, but in all likelihood, you will win absolutely nothing.
I don't see how this is a logical reason to say no to a additional crown crate. You would be no means obligated to open the collections menu if they were to give you a crown crate. Also, if you think its hard to find something in the collections menu, you must really despise inventories, bank etc.
In regards to your suggestion, they could do it, but that doesn't change the fact that its unreasonable to want the current subscription system to stay the same for everyone instead of increasing in value for what we pay.
I guess we have different views on what "fair" means. To me a system where you pay money yet have no idea what you are getting in exchange, isn't fair. Nor is a model is that is based on a few, paying for the many. And a model that is designed to take advantage of human being's addictive nature and in some cases, lack of education and failure to understand the maths behind the system (in other words a system that preys on a proportion of the population that is unable to make an otherwise informed buying decision), is to me, not only unfair but morally pretty disgusting. And if you add it as part of a subscriber benefit, I'm not sure how a few subscribers ending up with a nice mount, and the majority ending up with nothing but a few gems, despite having paid the same subscription fee, is in anyway fair.
It's a weak point and not one that would affect everyone, but for me, it would bug the hell out of me to know that my subscription fee has paid for an item I have already chosen not to buy, and that was now also making it harder to find the things I did choose to buy. Finding the right costume from the 61 I already have is hard enough as it is. And yeah, I do despise the bank/inventory system. . The difference is, there are add-on's that can fix those. There is no possibility for add-ons to fix the collections system, so we are stuck with the mess it is.
Its a random item. its absolutely fair in that all players have the exact same chance to get the same items.
You mentioned people failing to understand the maths....you havent even looked at the maths. You skipped right over that to make a point that the maths makes incorrect. not invalid, i do see where you are coming from. but incorrect because the maths says you are.
You would be offended by having an extra costume is what you are saying here? Seriously? This from the person admitting they have 61 already. how often do you even look at these or change costume?
SantieClaws wrote: »Khajiit feels that something extra is needed.
Possibly an increase in the amount of crowns received would be best - then it up to the traveller to decide how to use them.
The cost of items in the store is now usually so high that the crowns received have been devalued in terms of what you may obtain with them.
This one never wanted the crates in Tamriel. As an honest merchant this one she believes in knowing exactly what you buy before you loosen your purse strings. No one should have to gamble repeatedly for the small chance of getting the thing they wish to purchase.
Yours with paws
Santie Claws
Autumnhart wrote: »
voted no because of lack of an "other" option which is akin to saying "obviously nobody else can have better ideas."
i would rather see some number of the crown gems things so that instead of lotto you get the alt currency of the crown store or at least an option to get crowns or gems (in some ratio) as your sub reward. Since they now have two currencies and some items are not really available from just crowns, it seems to me reasonable to offer up both currencies as optional reawrds.
BlueViolet wrote: »I would rather have a loyalty rewards program of some form, be it for subscribers, or even people who have been playing for years, subbers or not.
I found your vote to be limited, as reading it for the first time it occurred to me that there should be at least a few more options for responding...
but, regarding your question - sure, why not. I sub. I have since release...I certainly have no objection to getting free crown crates. I've enjoyed the freebies that they gave away as promos.
however, I still feel the crown crates are an insulting and stupid way to deliver otherwise interesting game items. I have never paid money for a crown crate, and I never will...there are a ton of costumes I'd like, mounts and pets and things that look interesting - I pay for a sub, and this crown crate random crap is the biggest load of *** I can think of...I find them personally insulting, and won't pay a cent for them NOT EVEN WITH MY ACCUMULATED *FREE* CROWNS FROM SUBBING
I only ever buy items from the crown store that AREN'T random - I pay money, I get what I want that the store offers.
I also find all this LIMITED TIME ONLY DISNEY VAULT *** to be...well...***. but that's another complaint
so sure, send me free crates if you want - I won't say no - still won't get me to buy them.
BlueViolet wrote: »I would rather have a loyalty rewards program of some form, be it for subscribers, or even people who have been playing for years, subbers or not.
how is not subbing loyalty?
re the crates, pointless gesture. i'll take it if they are handing it out. do i think they should? no. for no other reason than its not required. i very much doubt they'd get a single extra sub from it.
BlueViolet wrote: »BlueViolet wrote: »I would rather have a loyalty rewards program of some form, be it for subscribers, or even people who have been playing for years, subbers or not.
how is not subbing loyalty?
re the crates, pointless gesture. i'll take it if they are handing it out. do i think they should? no. for no other reason than its not required. i very much doubt they'd get a single extra sub from it.
Because there are people who have not subbed, no longer sub, but have played for a long time, and probably spent quite a lot on crowns to shop in the store. I'm quite sure there are people who have played since the game went B2P, which was in early 2015 I believe.
Either way, they have spent quite a bit of either time and money, or both, supporting the game. Why should they not be acknowledged as loyal supporters?