Rohamad_Ali wrote: »This event is a mess because the servers can not handle it right now .
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »This event is a mess because the servers can not handle it right now .
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »This event is a mess because the servers can not handle it right now .
Sounds like every event they've had
disintegr8 wrote: »Might park myself outside of the sewer entrances in Cyrodiil and gank people on their way in....
disintegr8 wrote: »Might park myself outside of the sewer entrances in Cyrodiil and gank people on their way in....
disintegr8 wrote: »Might park myself outside of the sewer entrances in Cyrodiil and gank people on their way in....
<salt>Another way for zergs and ball groups to ruin any hope of small scale play.</salt>
Publius_Scipio wrote: »Good. Unless there are incentives no one goes in there anymore.
I haven't played in this event yet, but what's sad about the reports of lag is that when IC was introduced in 2.1, it was *very* zergy, but fundamentally lag free.
NightbladeMechanics wrote: »I haven't played in this event yet, but what's sad about the reports of lag is that when IC was introduced in 2.1, it was *very* zergy, but fundamentally lag free.
This...is very true. It was oddly laggy in IC tonight, but in a sort of sporadic, spiking lag, not the sort of consistent, muddy lag that characterizes overland Cyrodiil.
RaddlemanNumber7 wrote: »NightbladeMechanics wrote: »I haven't played in this event yet, but what's sad about the reports of lag is that when IC was introduced in 2.1, it was *very* zergy, but fundamentally lag free.
This...is very true. It was oddly laggy in IC tonight, but in a sort of sporadic, spiking lag, not the sort of consistent, muddy lag that characterizes overland Cyrodiil.
I was in IC overground districts all yesterday evening on EU PC and had no lag at all, but this may be entirely due to the very small number of people participating in Kastav.