Azura's Star NA PC Thread PART 3

Drakkdjinn

This set needs a serious nerf on Azura's, it's breaking the campaign.

http://imgur.com/a/9iFzc

Scamh

vamp_emily wrote: »

Scamh wrote: »

You've teabagged me and I just really wish you wouldn't talk about your fluffy all the time... I don't associate it with Vurian, you see. Big problem.

I'm sure you deserved it. Were the sniper that kept killing me when I came out of Ash?

Haha i almost wish but I really hate snipe and I don't run a gank build.

But no, I was level 22 (I levelled in azura's) and it started out as a 1v1 that got zerged by the rest of DC. Tank Emily. Not very tanky, btw.

yodased

I gotta come back to azura

Humphie

yodased wrote: »

I gotta come back to azura

Bring salt...

NBrookus

Pretty sure Azura's has enough salt and enough potatos. Bring burgers.

Humphie

NBrookus wrote: »

Pretty sure Azura's has enough salt and enough potatos. Bring burgers.

Can't be enough salt for this amount of baked potatoes. Ever

Scamh

veggie* burgers

Raknosh

Man I barely even play Azura but your tread is entertaining xD

Malibulove

Vurian97 wrote: »

My favorite thing about these are when I get to talk to some Forum Mods in the DM's and we get to giggle over some of the reports because a lot of people just hit report on my posts.

Given recent events this post might be the funniest in the thread.

Humphie

Malibulove wrote: »

Vurian97 wrote: »

My favorite thing about these are when I get to talk to some Forum Mods in the DM's and we get to giggle over some of the reports because a lot of people just hit report on my posts.

Given recent events this post might be the funniest in the thread.

Maaaaaan....I just cleaned....now I got juice all over this table. THANKS a lot

Alishka_Gunter

Munavar wrote: »

And there goes another opinionated falsehood posting. Your own 'proof' is detrimental to your case.

1) There is a scroll at Kings. Why would TM touch that keep? It would only attract a significant segment of AD. Why would we hinder the dethrone (that you believe we care so much about)?

2) In your scenario, would not TM be at Aleswell to assist with the dethrone (that you believe we care so much about)?

3) Bleakers is red. Everyone knows TM would take it (even when we don't) over any other objective on the map.

You are in DR, maybe you have a distinctly negative biased viewpoint of TM. <shrug>

I resent that; I am in DR and for the most part enjoy playing against TM. Both Micah and Night Squirrel are on my friends list; usually for some PvP banter but also to rant about common ground as well

Second; who were you saying was in DR? Sixth? He isn't DR lol

Edit - Nevermind, you were responding to Freddie. Carry on, nothing to see here *whistles to himself*

Magus

I'm beginning to play in Azura's more.

Some thoughts: The NPCs are stronger than 99% of the players on this campaign and siege is overtuned. Siege and NPCs are not PVP. I can build around no CP, no issues but those two aforementioned issues annoy me.

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

PenguinInACan

Magus wrote: »

I'm beginning to play in Azura's more.

Some thoughts: The NPCs are stronger than 99% of the players on this campaign and siege is overtuned. Siege and NPCs are not PVP. I can build around no CP, no issues but those two aforementioned issues annoy me.

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

The thing a lot of people can't seem to get is that failure to 1vX = getting Xv1'd. People that try and pull people out of a siege or around a tree and get all bent out of shape when the wrong combination of X show up and cry "Xv1 horribleness" turn all of these "1vX-ers" into boys who cry zerg.

And there is a lot of that lately in all of Cyro.

Magus

Oh I know. I was 1vXing the other morning and fully expected to die - this is how you test limits and measure build effectiveness and what adjustments are needed. Yet one of these very posters in this thread, teabagged me, so I challenged him to a duel. He refused and told me chill out, so then in the next several minutes I went into his little group and killed him 3 times in a row and teabagged him back each time to prove a point. If you give the bags, accept the duel. If you don't ever want to duel in this game, that's fine, all you have to do is refrain from bagging.

usmcjdking

Magus wrote: »

Oh I know. I was 1vXing the other morning and fully expected to die - this is how you test limits and measure build effectiveness and what adjustments are needed. Yet one of these very posters in this thread, teabagged me, so I challenged him to a duel. He refused and told me chill out, so then in the next several minutes I went into his little group and killed him 3 times in a row and teabagged him back each time to prove a point. If you give the bags, accept the duel. If you don't ever want to duel in this game, that's fine, all you have to do is refrain from bagging.

Reminds me of that time I dueled you thinking "lol 42khp stam dk about to get ate up".

And then I caught an 11k WB. Took a while to realize you were emperor.

Magus

usmcjdking wrote: »

Magus wrote: »

Oh I know. I was 1vXing the other morning and fully expected to die - this is how you test limits and measure build effectiveness and what adjustments are needed. Yet one of these very posters in this thread, teabagged me, so I challenged him to a duel. He refused and told me chill out, so then in the next several minutes I went into his little group and killed him 3 times in a row and teabagged him back each time to prove a point. If you give the bags, accept the duel. If you don't ever want to duel in this game, that's fine, all you have to do is refrain from bagging.

Reminds me of that time I dueled you thinking "lol 42khp stam dk about to get ate up".

And then I caught an 11k WB. Took a while to realize you were emperor.

The good old days before all the proc sets, destro ults, and cheese sets. It was pretty chill back then. One of these days I'll get emperor in this meta and it will be absolutely terrifying. But I'm too casual now and only play a few hours a day.

Playing in azuras and wearing seducer on a magDK is kind of nostalgic though but this DK hits way harder than my mDK in 1.5

Nihang

PenguinInACan wrote: »

Magus wrote: »

I'm beginning to play in Azura's more.

Some thoughts: The NPCs are stronger than 99% of the players on this campaign and siege is overtuned. Siege and NPCs are not PVP. I can build around no CP, no issues but those two aforementioned issues annoy me.

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

The thing a lot of people can't seem to get is that failure to 1vX = getting Xv1'd. People that try and pull people out of a siege or around a tree and get all bent out of shape when the wrong combination of X show up and cry "Xv1 horribleness" turn all of these "1vX-ers" into boys who cry zerg.

And there is a lot of that lately in all of Cyro.

interesting.

Publius_Scipio

I'm on my phone and I see that the icon next to this thread has bars on it. I went inside and realize it is the OP's forum icon behind what seems to be jail bars. Lol?

Sixth

Smh, I post a picture and said thanks for AP this morning. It wasn't about it being a 5v3 at a resource, IT WAS ABOUT THE FACT THEY KEPT COMING BACK AND GIVING ME AP. Y'all know I don't care about winning duels, I care about my AP, winning the campaign and getting better. All I seen was Taytay get EXTREMELY salty

Joshlenoir

Scamh wrote: »

veggie* burgers

My favorite

Joshlenoir

Magus wrote: »

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

FINALLY SOMEONE SAID IT

Sixth

Joshlenoir wrote: »

Magus wrote: »

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

FINALLY SOMEONE SAID IT

I teabag don jay cause if he has boozdogs nuts in his mouth, whts an extra pair!

LeifErickson

PenguinInACan wrote: »

Magus wrote: »

I'm beginning to play in Azura's more.

Some thoughts: The NPCs are stronger than 99% of the players on this campaign and siege is overtuned. Siege and NPCs are not PVP. I can build around no CP, no issues but those two aforementioned issues annoy me.

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

The thing a lot of people can't seem to get is that failure to 1vX = getting Xv1'd. People that try and pull people out of a siege or around a tree and get all bent out of shape when the wrong combination of X show up and cry "Xv1 horribleness" turn all of these "1vX-ers" into boys who cry zerg.

And there is a lot of that lately in all of Cyro.

While I agree with you, how do you justify chasing a solo player halfway from roe to brindle? I have seen TM do this many times and I just don't see any logical reason for it unless you get enjoyment out of it.

PenguinInACan

LeifErickson wrote: »

PenguinInACan wrote: »

Magus wrote: »

I'm beginning to play in Azura's more.

Some thoughts: The NPCs are stronger than 99% of the players on this campaign and siege is overtuned. Siege and NPCs are not PVP. I can build around no CP, no issues but those two aforementioned issues annoy me.

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

The thing a lot of people can't seem to get is that failure to 1vX = getting Xv1'd. People that try and pull people out of a siege or around a tree and get all bent out of shape when the wrong combination of X show up and cry "Xv1 horribleness" turn all of these "1vX-ers" into boys who cry zerg.

And there is a lot of that lately in all of Cyro.

While I agree with you, how do you justify chasing a solo player halfway from roe to brindle? I have seen TM do this many times and I just don't see any logical reason for it unless you get enjoyment out of it.

I don't justify it. Sometimes its a vendetta, sometimes its just the direction we happen to be running. Doesn't make it right. But that's what you get in non-structured open world PvP.

Magus

LeifErickson wrote: »

PenguinInACan wrote: »

Magus wrote: »

I'm beginning to play in Azura's more.

Some thoughts: The NPCs are stronger than 99% of the players on this campaign and siege is overtuned. Siege and NPCs are not PVP. I can build around no CP, no issues but those two aforementioned issues annoy me.

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

The thing a lot of people can't seem to get is that failure to 1vX = getting Xv1'd. People that try and pull people out of a siege or around a tree and get all bent out of shape when the wrong combination of X show up and cry "Xv1 horribleness" turn all of these "1vX-ers" into boys who cry zerg.

And there is a lot of that lately in all of Cyro.

While I agree with you, how do you justify chasing a solo player halfway from roe to brindle? I have seen TM do this many times and I just don't see any logical reason for it unless you get enjoyment out of it.

Any number of reasons. Boredom because azura's isn't always action packed. Because you were picking off group members in the back line. If you are spared, you will come back and mess with the back line again - often with more numbers and become even more of a nuisance (in general, not you specifically). Because eternal hunt nightblades are an infinitely irritating playstyle to fight (now you specifically ). If I find myself leading a TM group any time soon, I will tell them to let solo yolos run free - unless it becomes to the point where you mess with the backline too much and become an annoyance or it is specific individuals with bad blood. If I have to go rez anyone that chased a 1vX build with a group build and got themselves 1vX'd, I will be infinitely annoyed with that group member as well for wasting my time to have to go save them. TM groups are usually pretty easy to avoid because obvious farms are obvious. However, again if I am leading, which won't be likely or often, I would push objectives a bit because farming is kind of dull to me.

Joshlenoir

Publius_Scipio wrote: »

I'm on my phone and I see that the icon next to this thread has bars on it. I went inside and realize it is the OP's forum icon behind what seems to be jail bars. Lol?

I'm on a warning level 4 on forums lol, it should be pretty obvious why, I don't know what warning level I have to exceed to get banned, but I should probably ask Vurian since he literally got the hammer today.

Heike

Does anyone in EP actually OWN a homestead, or do they just squat in someone's home early in the morning and pack up and sneak out quietly before primetime... lol

Sixth

Joshlenoir wrote: »

Publius_Scipio wrote: »

I'm on my phone and I see that the icon next to this thread has bars on it. I went inside and realize it is the OP's forum icon behind what seems to be jail bars. Lol?

I'm on a warning level 4 on forums lol, it should be pretty obvious why, I don't know what warning level I have to exceed to get banned, but I should probably ask Vurian since he literally got the hammer today.

I think it depends on how many don't like you, cause some people get so butt hurt and press report. I'll never report a post on here or in game, it's the internet folks, leave ur feelings at the door

WhiteMage

Magus wrote: »

LeifErickson wrote: »

PenguinInACan wrote: »

Magus wrote: »

I'm beginning to play in Azura's more.

Some thoughts: The NPCs are stronger than 99% of the players on this campaign and siege is overtuned. Siege and NPCs are not PVP. I can build around no CP, no issues but those two aforementioned issues annoy me.

Don't Xv1 someone and teabag them unless you are willing to 1v1 said person. Teabags are reserved for guildmates who die before they get a rez.

The thing a lot of people can't seem to get is that failure to 1vX = getting Xv1'd. People that try and pull people out of a siege or around a tree and get all bent out of shape when the wrong combination of X show up and cry "Xv1 horribleness" turn all of these "1vX-ers" into boys who cry zerg.

And there is a lot of that lately in all of Cyro.

While I agree with you, how do you justify chasing a solo player halfway from roe to brindle? I have seen TM do this many times and I just don't see any logical reason for it unless you get enjoyment out of it.

Any number of reasons. Boredom because azura's isn't always action packed. Because you were picking off group members in the back line. If you are spared, you will come back and mess with the back line again - often with more numbers and become even more of a nuisance (in general, not you specifically). Because eternal hunt nightblades are an infinitely irritating playstyle to fight (now you specifically ). If I find myself leading a TM group any time soon, I will tell them to let solo yolos run free - unless it becomes to the point where you mess with the backline too much and become an annoyance or it is specific individuals with bad blood. If I have to go rez anyone that chased a 1vX build with a group build and got themselves 1vX'd, I will be infinitely annoyed with that group member as well for wasting my time to have to go save them. TM groups are usually pretty easy to avoid because obvious farms are obvious. However, again if I am leading, which won't be likely or often, I would push objectives a bit because farming is kind of dull to me.

I think I might end up liking you.

Kartalin

I reported exactly one of his posts because he called another player an idiot. Attack guilds all you want, even mine, and it doesn't bother me. But don't call anyone in particular names like that, regardless of whether they are my friend or in my guild or not. It's just not cool, y'know?