KingYogi415 wrote: »So all you completionests and role players are OK with ZOS selling your reward to anyone?
99% of the player base will buy these manors and not earn them.
Zos's employee who created the never winter store, has a degree in psychology specializing in Video Game Addiction.
This huge grind wall manipulates people into spending money over playing the content.
It's disgusting and will lead to much much worse...
Cheers!
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »I hope the Medium and Small houses also have pre-reqs, obviously not as stringent as the Manors.
Given that most of the cultures in ESO are based to some degree on some variant of Middle Ages feudalism it makes perfect sense to have players need certain achievements before qualifying to own land, because that is exactly how feudalism worked; if you wanted to own land you had to earn that privilege by doing favours for and serving the person(s) higher up the feudal rankings than you.
So it would make perfect sense to need to have obtained a certain achievement title in, for example, The Rift to be able to own land there.
All The Best
AzraelKrieg wrote: »
The smaller ones don't have requirements like the manors.
I'm glad they put in requirements beyond simply the gold price to own houses, because it fits with the precedent set by other Elder Scrolls Games and because it makes it feel more like an actual part of the game instead of something tacked on the side. People are forever asking for quests to obtain cosmetic stuff, like finding and taming mounts (or at least learning how to care for and ride them) or quests to obtain or earn the right to wear costumes. Now we're getting exactly what those people asked for.
Yes. Frankly, given the revenue model I would be somewhat unhappy if they didn't. The game needs to make money, and housing seems like a reasonable way to do it. It's likely I'll even buy some crown stuff for my house. I don't need to though, as I've got plenty of gold for multiple mansions, and my main is a maxed crafter. And I certainly meet all the requirements for any property (yeah, I went around and saved all the Kings/Queens rears, so you know, got some rep with them). And I guess I didn't realize being a dedicated "end game" player basically meant that you just skipped the game right to the end.KingYogi415 wrote: »So all you completionests and role players are OK with ZOS selling your reward to anyone?
KingYogi415 wrote: »
For the privilege to spend your 3.7 mil on a manor you will still need 40-80 hours of meaningless grinding.
What end-game player is going to stop running trials or pvp to quest?
Where are the houses unlocked for beating every vet trial?
I'm more disappointed that some people think questing in an RPG is "meaningless grind". What happened to actually playing games instead of rushing through them as fast as possible so you can reach the "end game" and do the same tiny bit over and over and over hoping for the one item you need to...do the exact same thing with slightly higher numbers?
KingYogi415 wrote: »This thread right now:
ChildOfLight wrote: »At least you have the choice to use Crowns to buy a non-in-game-helping feature.
Choice not given to the non-Esoplus members regarding the craft bag. Which is an extremely in-game-helping feature (to not say p2w).
KingYogi415 wrote: »This thread right now:
Waffennacht wrote: »I think the majority of players have most of this already completed and most will be happy participants in finishing them.
I'm surprised by your outrage
This! Everyone I know was pushing me to brink Breda's mead
I'm more disappointed that some people think questing in an RPG is "meaningless grind". What happened to actually playing games instead of rushing through them as fast as possible so you can reach the "end game" and do the same tiny bit over and over and over hoping for the one item you need to...do the exact same thing with slightly higher numbers?
(And if your answer is "I already did all that in the first year!" then the question is not for you, because you've already completed the requirements and so have nothing to complain about.)
I'm glad they put in requirements beyond simply the gold price to own houses, because it fits with the precedent set by other Elder Scrolls Games and because it makes it feel more like an actual part of the game instead of something tacked on the side. People are forever asking for quests to obtain cosmetic stuff, like finding and taming mounts (or at least learning how to care for and ride them) or quests to obtain or earn the right to wear costumes. Now we're getting exactly what those people asked for.
(And yes it might well be just a way of pushing people towards the crown store, but lets be honest here: if they're going to charge 4,500 crowns for an elk the crown prices for houses are going to be absurd, especially the best ones. It wouldn't surprise me at all if as soon as we know the real-money prices for these actually having to play the game to buy them with gold will suddenly seem very reasonable even to "end game" players who hate the idea of leaving dungeons/trials.)
Waffennacht wrote: »I think the majority of players have most of this already completed and most will be happy participants in finishing them.
I'm surprised by your outrage