no reason to change anything regarding this.
@Manoekin I meant your comment on the controlling guards technique! I remember some of the Ala folks complaining about an EP who used that.. The good old days when "not working as intended" meant you could have some fun with things for a month or three!
How's this for corrupt. Ever been bribed to leave your home campaign before?
@Crown That doesn't sound right man. Surely it's abuse of game mechanics? You're basically cheating the system to obtain emperor status. I really hope they consider taking a stronger stance on this.Isn't logging onto enemy alliance alts to literally just feed your friend AP a bannable thing? I was under the impression it was.Sandman929 wrote: »And yes, I think friend farming is bannable...but ZOS doesn't police
@Valencer and @Sandman929 Unfortunately it is not. We reported quite a few people for it, and the responses that we got were always along the lines of, "people can play how they want, and if people want to spend their time in game repeatedly dying to one another then they are entitled to do so".
Knootewoot wrote: »How's this for corrupt. Ever been bribed to leave your home campaign before?
Man, what some people do for a mere achievement which they didn't earn anyway.
I never get emperor since I play to little to keep up with "the big boys". Normally I would respect someone who became emperor but not since many people were handed it over by agreements and guild rotations.
If I would be granted 200k or 50k I would take the money but still stay on the campaign.
Knootewoot wrote: »How's this for corrupt. Ever been bribed to leave your home campaign before?
Man, what some people do for a mere achievement which they didn't earn anyway.
I never get emperor since I play to little to keep up with "the big boys". Normally I would respect someone who became emperor but not since many people were handed it over by agreements and guild rotations.
If I would be granted 200k or 50k I would take the money but still stay on the campaign.
I'd love to earn the Emperor status just to say I've done it, but I want to do it properly. I always play solo, so I was pretty excited to get it, until these guys rolled in and started feeding. I pretty much gave up and left the campaign. Haderus is now used as a cheap emperor achievement before people move on.
I tried haderus again 2 weeks ago, went to IC and saw people feeding inside the Arena for the Arena achievement. It's one of the worst places for legit PVP now.
How's this for corrupt. Ever been bribed to leave your home campaign before?
@Crown That doesn't sound right man. Surely it's abuse of game mechanics? You're basically cheating the system to obtain emperor status. I really hope they consider taking a stronger stance on this.Isn't logging onto enemy alliance alts to literally just feed your friend AP a bannable thing? I was under the impression it was.Sandman929 wrote: »And yes, I think friend farming is bannable...but ZOS doesn't police
@Valencer and @Sandman929 Unfortunately it is not. We reported quite a few people for it, and the responses that we got were always along the lines of, "people can play how they want, and if people want to spend their time in game repeatedly dying to one another then they are entitled to do so".
themdogesbite wrote: »Minimum AvA rank of 50 should sort this out. No more false emperors!
How's this for corrupt. Ever been bribed to leave your home campaign before?
I have played ESO since launch. For the past few months, I have mostly played on Haderus and I have ALWAYS played as EP. I have a lot of PVP experience and I work to organize the swarm of EP pugs through my main guild, M4D.
Yesterday for the first time ever, I crossed faction lines and used my vet-level DC toon to fight and dethrone an EP Emperor. I was one of twelve apostles of doom in the Legion of Mordor raid that spearheaded the DC assault. No EP force could stand in our path. By 2AM EST, a DC emperor was crowned.
Why you may ask, would I perform such a blasphemous deed? Quite simply, I am tired of False Emperors. I am tired of cheaters with 313cp who subvert the obvious intent of the game. They AP farm their way to the top of the leaderboard (yes, we know exactly what you are doing) and don't contribute anything to the camaraderie that develops among those of us who truly love PVP and fight the battles. They are the people who somehow feel that they are entitled, when they really haven't come close to earning the privilege of wearing the regalia. Quite simply, they are the annoying people who somehow feel that we all play this game for their benefit.
To limit this farce in the future, I propose the following two additional conditions upon Emperorship (in vet-level campaigns).
1) You MUST have maximum CP to qualify as Emperor. The Emperor should be a fearsome force, not some whelp with purple gear.
2) You MUST have achieved the rank of Tribune or higher in the Alliance Wars. It's pathetic that some Emperors barely even know how to use siege, never-mind the strategy and tactics required to properly lead a faction.
Until these measures are enacted, I will continue to cross faction lines and actively work to dethrone the cheaters. I encourage others to do the same. We as a PVP community deserve better. For now, this is the only way.
@Crown That doesn't sound right man. Surely it's abuse of game mechanics? You're basically cheating the system to obtain emperor status. I really hope they consider taking a stronger stance on this.Isn't logging onto enemy alliance alts to literally just feed your friend AP a bannable thing? I was under the impression it was.Sandman929 wrote: »And yes, I think friend farming is bannable...but ZOS doesn't police
@Valencer and @Sandman929 Unfortunately it is not. We reported quite a few people for it, and the responses that we got were always along the lines of, "people can play how they want, and if people want to spend their time in game repeatedly dying to one another then they are entitled to do so".
@Alucardo Cheating the system is very different from gaming the system. We had a discussion on this with the ZOS folks in one of the guild meetings (I think it was Netflix & Chill, though may be have been another - it's been so long I don't recall). From their perspective, breaking the terms and conditions is a bannable offence, though breaking the "spirit" of the PvP portion of the game is not.
@ZOS_GinaBruno It would be nice if you chimed in to confirm that things are still as they were last time we talked about this (or that they've been changed and how). I know your team doesn't like giving long answers that can be subject to interpretation, though a simple "We understand the frustration that some of our PvP player base feels, and while we are considering how we can address situations like this (and even if we should at all), at present farming kills on your friends is not something that we consider against the terms and conditions."themdogesbite wrote: »Minimum AvA rank of 50 should sort this out. No more false emperors!
@themdogesbite I know you're joking but the basis of that idea is sound. Raising the rank requirement to something like 24 (8 million earned) would at least require that the player be somewhat experienced.. Most of us who have hit AR50 have reached the point that we don't care anymore! After your 50th time emp (not counting back-to-backs due to night-caps by other factions) it just gets tiring to have to care about the campaign and map - in my case these days, I just want to play for an hour or two and have fun with friends. Your EU crew were among the first AR50s - how do you feel about PvP these days?