No other armor in the entire game looks so awkward and goofy. I can't believe that this made it to the crown store and priced at $20 none the less.
Does no one else remember zos said there will never be capes due to lag. That statement explains everything.
SantieClaws wrote: »Yours with paws
Santie Claws
Wow still no comment from the ZOS staff on this matter. How predictable they really are.
I hate to put derogatory names on people or organizations unless they really fit the profile. In this case two words come to mind when summing up ZOS and it's employee's. INCOMPETENT and PATHETIC.
Bad_Company wrote: »SantieClaws wrote: »Yours with paws
Santie Claws
@SantieClaws I was expecting your signature to be "Yours with paws (and without pants)"
Does no one else remember zos said there will never be capes due to lag. That statement explains everything.
To be honest, if somebody offered me $20 to wear this in game for the next month I would decline. It really is that awful.
vyndral13preub18_ESO wrote: »Does no one else remember zos said there will never be capes due to lag. That statement explains everything.
Even if this is true, it still does explain the horrible decision to put something on a costume that looks like a cape but is pants.
They made a horrible looking costume. If they knew the game couldnt do it, make an awesome looking costume without a pape.
Get it? pants+cape=pape!
phreatophile wrote: »To be honest, if somebody offered me $20 to wear this in game for the next month I would decline. It really is that awful.
I have to agree. I don't think I'd wear it for a month for $100 either.
Maybe at $20 per day... nope still not worth ruining my limited game time with that visual atrocity.
SantieClaws wrote: »The capes they cause the lag?
Well maybe then khajiit she has a way of lessening the lag if clothing is a contributor yes.
Why not remove all the built in undiewears? Most of us choose to wear the clothes sometimes and thus the beautiful yet functional design of the built in undiewears is hidden.
So why not remove it all and let khajiit and elf alike choose how much they wish to outrage the public decency? Let that be free which wishes to be free from the unnatural constraints of the clothing.
Also reduce the lag at the same time yes? If making the torchbugs extinct in Cyrodiill is possible they why not also remove the lag pants?
Yours with paws
Santie Claws
@E-Zekiel
The cloths in GW2 may not have dynamic or 'real' physics but it's still sure as hell way better than anything ESO has in the Armour department. The cloth simulation and movement may not seem like a big deal but it really does make a big difference to me overall.
Moving your character side to side and seeing a dress or robe sway with you just adds that little bit extra to the armour design and hows how a lot of effort went into designing each piece. This is what kills me in ESO as they, again, could implement the 'cloth simulation' but don't as they would not gain any $$$ from it.
Another thing ZOS could take from GW2 is the fact that GW2 added a bunch of actual content throughout it's B2P life for free. All content ZOS had added since going B2P has been DLC
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Honestly, the fact that when mods lock other threads regarding this that they link those threads to this one is acknowledgement in my book.
No its not. Its damage control. You herd all complainers into one thread and its just a thread instead of a massive oucry overwhelming the forums. Then it eventually dies down and falls off the front page and the issue is gone.
And how would they know to herd them if they did not have a thread they know about to herd them into? Trust me, it's acknowledged.
Moderators arent devs. Mods saw the issue and contained it to be, most likely, ignored by the devs. Yeah, sure, maybe if barely anyone bought the costume theyll do something about the next ones that get made. That does not mean higher quality tho - most likely theyll just avoid the coat/cloak style in the future altogether.
They do work for the devs though, which means they are able to contact them. Also mods may very well report their actions to their "higher ups". Besides, this thread is 12 pages long and growing, how could the lurking devs NOT notice and acknowledge it lol
I have a feeling youre now arguing over the semantics of the word. What does 'acknowledgement' do for us here? Not much really. Even if a community manager posted a message saying: we're working on it, it still would mean very little as far as actually getting things fixed. Good examples of this being: bloated motifs, broken light attack weaving, misshapen female armor meshes.
Wow still no comment from the ZOS staff on this matter. How predictable they really are.
I hate to put derogatory names on people or organizations unless they really fit the profile. In this case two words come to mind when summing up ZOS and it's employee's. INCOMPETENT and PATHETIC.
bikerangelo wrote: »
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Honestly, the fact that when mods lock other threads regarding this that they link those threads to this one is acknowledgement in my book.
No its not. Its damage control. You herd all complainers into one thread and its just a thread instead of a massive oucry overwhelming the forums. Then it eventually dies down and falls off the front page and the issue is gone.
And how would they know to herd them if they did not have a thread they know about to herd them into? Trust me, it's acknowledged.
Moderators arent devs. Mods saw the issue and contained it to be, most likely, ignored by the devs. Yeah, sure, maybe if barely anyone bought the costume theyll do something about the next ones that get made. That does not mean higher quality tho - most likely theyll just avoid the coat/cloak style in the future altogether.
They do work for the devs though, which means they are able to contact them. Also mods may very well report their actions to their "higher ups". Besides, this thread is 12 pages long and growing, how could the lurking devs NOT notice and acknowledge it lol
I have a feeling youre now arguing over the semantics of the word. What does 'acknowledgement' do for us here? Not much really. Even if a community manager posted a message saying: we're working on it, it still would mean very little as far as actually getting things fixed. Good examples of this being: bloated motifs, broken light attack weaving, misshapen female armor meshes.
Just because it isn't fixed yet doesn't mean it's ignored.
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Honestly, the fact that when mods lock other threads regarding this that they link those threads to this one is acknowledgement in my book.
No its not. Its damage control. You herd all complainers into one thread and its just a thread instead of a massive oucry overwhelming the forums. Then it eventually dies down and falls off the front page and the issue is gone.
And how would they know to herd them if they did not have a thread they know about to herd them into? Trust me, it's acknowledged.
Moderators arent devs. Mods saw the issue and contained it to be, most likely, ignored by the devs. Yeah, sure, maybe if barely anyone bought the costume theyll do something about the next ones that get made. That does not mean higher quality tho - most likely theyll just avoid the coat/cloak style in the future altogether.
They do work for the devs though, which means they are able to contact them. Also mods may very well report their actions to their "higher ups". Besides, this thread is 12 pages long and growing, how could the lurking devs NOT notice and acknowledge it lol
I have a feeling youre now arguing over the semantics of the word. What does 'acknowledgement' do for us here? Not much really. Even if a community manager posted a message saying: we're working on it, it still would mean very little as far as actually getting things fixed. Good examples of this being: bloated motifs, broken light attack weaving, misshapen female armor meshes.
Just because it isn't fixed yet doesn't mean it's ignored.
After 3-4 months... its hard to say it isnt.