NA PC BWB: Third Times A Charm

vamp_emily

Freakquent wrote: »

I'm online pretty often actually... I may not have screenshots to prove that AD gets ganged up on also, mainly because I don't like to whine, but it does happen.

Looks at your signature ( PC/NA/AD/EP ) now I am the one lol'ing.

Freakquent

Setana_Shial wrote: »

Hello everyone. This is my first time to the forum even though I've read this thread a bit.
Anyways I have been out of BwB for the last few weeks with new content and also been doing a good bit of Azura's.
I will be coming back to BwB soon though, hope to see you all there.

Welcome!

Adenoma

We can belabor the X is attacked by Y and Z point more or we can agree that all alliances are sometimes attacked when realistically they shouldn't be the target. Ultimately, I think it just comes down to people wanting to have fun. It's only so much fun for people to continually bash their head into a keep, lose a bunch of siege, and come out unsuccessful. I know that when I'm having a bad time on the EP side of the map I switch to DC and vice versa.

It's fruitless to call out entire alliances for this sort of thing and it just leads to some nonsensical, inflammatory dialogue that got our last thread closed.

Dojohoda

Lumsdenml wrote: »

Just curious, but what is the highest alliance rank you have obtained in BWB? Seen in BWB? Highest I've noticed was Sergeant and was thinking that there has to be a cap due to the lvl cap in BWB.

One of my toons was a Lieutenant in BWB shortly after becoming level 49.

Freakquent

Adenoma wrote: »

We can belabor the X is attacked by Y and Z point more or we can agree that all alliances are sometimes attacked when realistically they shouldn't be the target. Ultimately, I think it just comes down to people wanting to have fun. It's only so much fun for people to continually bash their head into a keep, lose a bunch of siege, and come out unsuccessful. I know that when I'm having a bad time on the EP side of the map I switch to DC and vice versa.

It's fruitless to call out entire alliances for this sort of thing and it just leads to some nonsensical, inflammatory dialogue that got our last thread closed.

100% agree.

Stridig

Agreed

vamp_emily

Disagree 1000%

vamp_emily

Adenoma wrote: »

We can belabor the X is attacked by Y and Z point more or we can agree that all alliances are sometimes attacked when realistically they shouldn't be the target. Ultimately, I think it just comes down to people wanting to have fun. It's only so much fun for people to continually bash their head into a keep, lose a bunch of siege, and come out unsuccessful. I know that when I'm having a bad time on the EP side of the map I switch to DC and vice versa.

It's fruitless to call out entire alliances for this sort of thing and it just leads to some nonsensical, inflammatory dialogue that got our last thread closed.

After thinking about it for a bit ( trying to be good ), i think i do have the right to ask about why EP was not trying to dethrone emp like they have said they always do. Which was a lie. I didn't start talking about the alliance until some flip flopper made his lol statement.

I do have the right to state my opinion, or ask questions.

Stridig

If I remember correctly EP was trying very hard to dethrone. I believe the screen shot was originally posted around 5:30 Pacific time. Alessia had just un-flagged from an EP attack and shortly after Fare was under a full siege by EP. Hope this helps answer any questions anybody may have.

dem0n1k

vamp_emily wrote: »

Giggle all you want, I really wonder if you even play pvp.

I didn't "act" like it is a new occurrence, go back and read all the BwB posts and you will see the trend. I think we can agree, since you said EP does it to AD all that time ( which i disagree with that statement ), EP has poor leadership.

I was playing last night & AD had Emp, they had Arrius & were taking Farragut, they had Glademist & were taking Rayles.... & yet DC were attacking EP at Chalman... it happens all the time to ALL alliances.

In your screenshot, DC have an EP scroll at Rayles & own more keeps than AD... so a certain amount of EP players are going to try & get it back regardless of who has Emp.

ColoursYouHave

I don't even get to play all that much and I see every alliance attacking the "wrong" alliance all the time. Actually, I see every alliance doing virtually everything people complain about other alliances doing all the time.

And if people want to attack the "weak" alliance instead of trying to dethrone an emp or whatever, so what? You can only watch the group of pugs wipe at the front door of Ash so many times before you get bored and go watch the group of pugs wipe at the front door of Sej instead.

Freakquent

vamp_emily wrote: »

Disagree 1000%

EP dislikes AD just as much as DC does.

vamp_emily wrote: »

Adenoma wrote: »

We can belabor the X is attacked by Y and Z point more or we can agree that all alliances are sometimes attacked when realistically they shouldn't be the target. Ultimately, I think it just comes down to people wanting to have fun. It's only so much fun for people to continually bash their head into a keep, lose a bunch of siege, and come out unsuccessful. I know that when I'm having a bad time on the EP side of the map I switch to DC and vice versa.

It's fruitless to call out entire alliances for this sort of thing and it just leads to some nonsensical, inflammatory dialogue that got our last thread closed.

After thinking about it for a bit ( trying to be good ), i think i do have the right to ask about why EP was not trying to dethrone emp like they have said they always do. Which was a lie. I didn't start talking about the alliance until some flip flopper made his lol statement.

I do have the right to state my opinion, or ask questions.

So you can give your opinion, but I can't give mine? You started talking about the alliance before I even said anything to you. That's how it started, I replied saying that everyone goes through being double teamed. It's a 3-way fight, it is bound to happen. It's not about #teamgreen or #teampurple or even #teamorange, it's about what people, mainly group leaders, decide that they should do next. I'm trying to be as respectful as possible, even though you're being very narrow-minded. It's not that hard to see. Every single DC accuses AD and EP of having a truce, which is probably why you guys think that it's EP&AD vs DC. When it's not. Have a good day, because that is all I'm putting in on this subject, seeing as I want this topic to be a long and happy one.

Sreja_Bone

How about dem ice trebs?

vamp_emily

Freakquent wrote: »

So you can give your opinion, but I can't give mine?

You are twisting everything I say around, i never said you couldn't.

Adenoma

Personally, I prefer ice trebs to scattershots.

Setana_Shial

Grats to another AD Emp

Adenoma

Congrats @Valen_Byte !

Valen_Byte

@Setana_Shial @Adenoma Thank you!

Lumsdenml

vamp_emily wrote: »

Ad has had Emp and look who EP is attacking.

Sorry, haven't been in for a bit. This was ZZ attacking DC (or at least we started it). We got tired of being attacked by DC when we were trying to dethrone AD at Roe and then saw DC attacking Chal, so we pushed back.

Lumsdenml

Adenoma wrote: »

Personally, I prefer ice trebs to scattershots.

Lightning balista?

Reverb

Lumsdenml wrote: »

Adenoma wrote: »

Personally, I prefer ice trebs to scattershots.

Lightning balista?

I'm a fan, but since the majority are stam builds these days, they're not as effective as the used to be. Still hell on healers though, which is always fun.

Stridig

Lumsdenml wrote: »

vamp_emily wrote: »

Ad has had Emp and look who EP is attacking.

Sorry, haven't been in for a bit. This was ZZ attacking DC (or at least we started it). We got tired of being attacked by DC when we were trying to dethrone AD at Roe and then saw DC attacking Chal, so we pushed back.

Well.... I guess this ends the conspiracy theories.

Lumsdenml

vamp_emily wrote: »

Ad has had Emp and look who EP is attacking.

Oh, one other quick question.... are you afraid to come get skyshards from ep?

vamp_emily

Lumsdenml wrote: »

Sorry, haven't been in for a bit. This was ZZ attacking DC (or at least we started it). We got tired of being attacked by DC when we were trying to dethrone AD at Roe and then saw DC attacking Chal, so we pushed back.

Stridig wrote: »

Lumsdenml wrote: »

vamp_emily wrote: »

Ad has had Emp and look who EP is attacking.

Sorry, haven't been in for a bit. This was ZZ attacking DC (or at least we started it). We got tired of being attacked by DC when we were trying to dethrone AD at Roe and then saw DC attacking Chal, so we pushed back.

Well.... I guess this ends the conspiracy theories.

Not really , but I decided to save the thread.

Adenoma

Oil catapult new meta?

Reverb wrote: »

Lumsdenml wrote: »

Adenoma wrote: »

Personally, I prefer ice trebs to scattershots.

Lightning balista?

I'm a fan, but since the majority are stam builds these days, they're not as effective as the used to be. Still hell on healers though, which is always fun.

Lumsdenml

Adenoma wrote: »

Oil catapult new meta?

Reverb wrote: »

Lumsdenml wrote: »

Adenoma wrote: »

Personally, I prefer ice trebs to scattershots.

Lightning balista?

I'm a fan, but since the majority are stam builds these days, they're not as effective as the used to be. Still hell on healers though, which is always fun.

I find the oil catapult can be very effective if paired with Fire balista. You know, it is kinda too bad that when you shoot an oil catapult it doesn't leave a pool of oil on the ground that you could then light on fire with a fire balista...

vamp_emily

Lumsdenml wrote: »

vamp_emily wrote: »

Ad has had Emp and look who EP is attacking.

Oh, one other quick question.... are you afraid to come get skyshards from ep?

No it just shows you how often I attack EP. pft.. I'm definitely not scared of anyone there. Just last night I had 39 kills before my first death. Then the night before that I had 24 kills, 0 deaths, and 24 killing blows ganking AD as they came out of Roe. I felt sorry for one of the AD players. I killed him like six times:

I messaged him a few times:
"come back when you get good"
"I see you"
"omg, you want to die again?"

He almost got me, I traveled about a mile away from my ganking spot to go AFK, came back and the squashy banana found me. I kind of laughed after I killed him again, he really must have wanted me bad.

Adenoma

@vamp_emily , just point of order that it's hard to die when you just cloak and CC me. But, I won't fault someone for playing the game how they enjoy it

vamp_emily

Adenoma wrote: »

@vamp_emily , just point of order that it's hard to die when you just cloak and CC me. But, I won't fault someone for playing the game how they enjoy it

A wise man once said, "I think it just comes down to people wanting to have fun".

I'm not OP ( yet ) but I will kill the weak.

vamp_emily

NoRagret wrote: »

A guildie asked me to post this, I think his account is disabled or something along those lines:

"Please EVERYONE report @Sharakor by pressing F1, he uses leet hacks I SWEAR"

Honestly it should be reported to ZOS, not here on the forum. I think you can type /report in game.