Conquistador wrote: »This game is a trade simulator for me.
martinhpb16_ESO wrote: »I undoubtedly spend most of my time now in pvp since the devs decided to nerf the difficulty of open world pve, with Orsinium onwards.
I didn't complete TG and haven't even looked at DB. Easymode pve has no appeal for me. Having spoken to a few guildies there are some who have also not bothered with DB for the same reason.
I do think ESO makes a great job of group dungeons and trials, and I enjoy playing those with friends.
According to pcgamer.com, ESO has one of the best PvP in MMOs.
There were also other categories where ESO is nowhere to be found:
the best story-focused MMOs ,
the best sandbox MMOs,
the best "theme park" MMOs,
Playing ESO for quite a while now, I believe ZOS focuses far too much on other aspects of the game (like story) and fails to see that they have a gem in their pocket that they can cash in.
The decision to scrap PvP Justice might or might not be relevant to the whole "best PvP MMO" discussion, but it certainly does show their priorities.
Even when they left their PvP part of the game to wither for such a long time, leaving it in poor balance, horrible lag, exploiting and in the end blatant cheating, it still managed to get distinguished among so many other MMOs.
Imagine what would have become of ESO if PvP was nurtured and catered from the beginning. If the story of each DLC was supporting the idea of an ongoing war, instead of just ignoring it as just a separate part of the game.
If I get recognized by some NPCs as a savior of some sorry village, why do my feats in Cyrodill go unnoticed? Why does no NPC acknowledge my Alliance rank or recognizes me as a former emperor? Apart from Clivia in WGT, kudos for that.
ZOS, you better start treating PvP as a part of your game (and the best part, if I might add) before ESO's PvP gets outshadowed by some new and more exciting MMO.
You just might make ESO PvP something every MMO player would like to be a part of.
nimander99 wrote: »How dare ZoS focus on what the Elder Scrolls series is best known for... Storytelling
According to pcgamer.com, ESO has one of the best PvP in MMOs.
There were also other categories where ESO is nowhere to be found:
the best story-focused MMOs ,
the best sandbox MMOs,
the best "theme park" MMOs,
Playing ESO for quite a while now, I believe ZOS focuses far too much on other aspects of the game (like story) and fails to see that they have a gem in their pocket that they can cash in.
The decision to scrap PvP Justice might or might not be relevant to the whole "best PvP MMO" discussion, but it certainly does show their priorities.
Even when they left their PvP part of the game to wither for such a long time, leaving it in poor balance, horrible lag, exploiting and in the end blatant cheating, it still managed to get distinguished among so many other MMOs.
Imagine what would have become of ESO if PvP was nurtured and catered from the beginning. If the story of each DLC was supporting the idea of an ongoing war, instead of just ignoring it as just a separate part of the game.
If I get recognized by some NPCs as a savior of some sorry village, why do my feats in Cyrodill go unnoticed? Why does no NPC acknowledge my Alliance rank or recognizes me as a former emperor? Apart from Clivia in WGT, kudos for that.
ZOS, you better start treating PvP as a part of your game (and the best part, if I might add) before ESO's PvP gets outshadowed by some new and more exciting MMO.
You just might make ESO PvP something every MMO player would like to be a part of.
ZOS, you better start treating PvP as a part of your game (and the best part, if I might add) before ESO's PvP gets outshadowed by some new and more exciting MMO.
Molag_Crow wrote: »I thought the PvP was the best aspect of ESO at first but it really isn't, because it's just in a complete mess. Put it this way, I don't know a single game that has more unbalanced PvP in it, than ESO. It will never be balanced until they make a separate resource for Dodge Roll/Break Free/Block and if they keep over-nerfing classes into uselessness, while destroying them in PvE at the same time - and of course it'll never be completely fun with all the latency/fps issues.
Ignoring issues for months and not tweaking/listening to feedback on classes until it's too late, and of course not doing actual testing on live to see just how ridiculously strong some classes/resources are, and how broken some skills like (like Evasion/Shuffle.) I haven't played PvP in months though, but the last time I did play, it was just 80% stamina users with shuffle. How fun.
So, I have a question, and I apologize if it has been covered, and I missed it:
those who say this game is PvP with some PvE (e.g. @dtm_samuraib16_ESO's response), or just in general express a strong aversion to PvE in general, what attracted you to ESOTU, and why not another PvP-focused MMO?
I'm genuinely curious about this. Mostly for the example I'm about to give. I have asked others in the past in TS or in chat who have expressed a distaste for or disinterest in PvE why they play specifically this game (i.e. why did they choose ESOTU over other games), and the responses were typically the same: I liked TES series; I was a fan of Skryim; I love the lore." This presents a clash in interest. Essentially I'm hearing, "I don't PvE in this game because I do not like PvE in general. But I play this game because I played other TES games, and liked them." Do these statements seem contradictory to anyone else? At least one person who gave a conflicting response went into Cyrodiil as soon as they hit level 10 after launch, and haven't left. So how can you know you don't like PvE in the game?
For those of you here who don't PvE, and strictly play the PvP aspect, do you just find the PvE in this particular rendition of an Elder Scrolls franchise game boring compared to others in the series? Is that the true turn off? Maybe the community present in this game is better for you than other games with a larger PvP aspect? I'm genuinely curious.
ETA: I understand ESO was marketed to appeal to PvP'ers, and promised a lot in that regard. However, it's been two years. So I'm asking with the understanding of what PvP is now in ESO, not with what was promised.
Just this 10000% the PVE story line in this game is just trash.According to pcgamer.com, ESO has one of the best PvP in MMOs.
There were also other categories where ESO is nowhere to be found:
the best story-focused MMOs ,
the best sandbox MMOs,
the best "theme park" MMOs,
Playing ESO for quite a while now, I believe ZOS focuses far too much on other aspects of the game (like story) and fails to see that they have a gem in their pocket that they can cash in.
The decision to scrap PvP Justice might or might not be relevant to the whole "best PvP MMO" discussion, but it certainly does show their priorities.
Even when they left their PvP part of the game to wither for such a long time, leaving it in poor balance, horrible lag, exploiting and in the end blatant cheating, it still managed to get distinguished among so many other MMOs.
Imagine what would have become of ESO if PvP was nurtured and catered from the beginning. If the story of each DLC was supporting the idea of an ongoing war, instead of just ignoring it as just a separate part of the game.
If I get recognized by some NPCs as a savior of some sorry village, why do my feats in Cyrodill go unnoticed? Why does no NPC acknowledge my Alliance rank or recognizes me as a former emperor? Apart from Clivia in WGT, kudos for that.
ZOS, you better start treating PvP as a part of your game (and the best part, if I might add) before ESO's PvP gets outshadowed by some new and more exciting MMO.
You just might make ESO PvP something every MMO player would like to be a part of.
Hell yeah! Pve is too boring to even bother with. A child can write a more immersive story then the garbage story we see in pve. In pvp, the thrill of the fight is what make it so fun. Intensr seige battles, with both sides throwing everything they got at each other. U just cant beat that with a childish story.
At this point, pvp is not just the best aspect to me, its the only aspect to me.
Vipstaakki wrote: »
GreenhaloX wrote: »Well.. for avid or hardcore PvP players, they could arguably say yes, but for the many others who are not so much interested with PvP, they would debate other aspects of ESO to be better. PvP in ESO may well be better than many other games' PvP (according to your listed sources), but if relatively speaking just in terms within ESO, grouping for trials and vet level events could fall into a good debate on what aspects of ESO are better. I think there are better drops from completing trials and vet dungeons, and even from vet Maelstrom, than from doing PvP. Just from one's opinion, PvP is relatively enjoyable for the first couple or few weeks, but I then find it too monotonous to go around killing other players, getting killed yourself, attacking and capturing keeps, then the others attacking and capturing your keeps and press repeat and repeat. After leveling up the assault skill bar and unlocking vigor and caltrops, I find it hard to head back into the PvP realm. Again, just one lonewolf's opinion here.