All the Pretty Dead Horses

FortheloveofKrist

For anyone new to the forums and/or the game (I have seen a few announcements lately), let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition. Please search for these threads to avoid bringing up yet another gripe that is already being pummeled into the ground elsewhere on the forums:

• ESO+ crafting bags are unfair
• PvP lag sucks
• I can't see my character's breasts in this costume
• Justice System guards are OP
• Viscious Death is OP
• WGT is OP
• Crafting is OP
• Flower picking is OP
• Nerf this skill/ability (cause it just killed me and I'm embarrassed and annoyed)
• Don't nerf this skill/ability (cause I use it and it's OP and I like that)
• I'm unsubbing until ZoS changes this ****
• Gimme my g*****n Maelstrom weapon already!!
• Miracle Whip is NOT mayonnaise

Any vet forumers want to add some topics I have left out?

P.S. A cookie for anyone who gets the literary pun in the title.

ManwithBeard9

Stam whip and Wrobel hate spam.

FortheloveofKrist

ManwithBeard9 wrote: »

Stam whip and Wrobel hate spam.

Oooo...Wrobel hate spam. Forgot that one.

idk

OP forgot Polls are OP.

Osteos

vampires

*flees*

MasterSpatula

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

ShedsHisTail

Too many Nightblades.

CasNation

Nerf Cormac McCarthy.

Oberon45

Auction house threads

FortheloveofKrist

CasNation wrote: »

Nerf Cormac McCarthy.

For that you get one tasty cookie. Sending it in the mail.

ArchMikem

ShedsHisTail wrote: »

Too many Nightblades.

Too many Vampire Nightblades.

FortheloveofKrist

MasterSpatula wrote: »

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

Oh @MasterSpatula, did you only read the first 7 words of a post again? You silly. I didn't say they were off limits. I said they should seek out one of the many threads that are already discussing these belabored topics.

Voxicity

Meme threads. Kill me now.

EDIT: NaTcH pOtEs AHAHAHA I AM FUNY YOU SEE BECAUSE I SWITCH THE LETTER AROUND :DDDDDDDDDDD

Zerok

Auction house...

MasterSpatula

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

Oh @MasterSpatula, did you only read the first 7 words of a post again? You silly. I didn't say they were off limits. I said they should seek out one of the many threads that are already discussing these belabored topics.

What's this again ***, kemosabe?

Nowhere in the words

...let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition. Please search for these threads to avoid bringing up yet another gripe that is already being pummeled into the ground elsewhere on the forums:

does it say avoid creating new threads. Your meaning can be inferred, but "avoid bringing up another gripe" could just as easily be read as "let this topic go."

My read is valid. I get what you're saying now, but your wording was imprecise.

Also, just to be extra pedantic, your first 7 words were "For anyone new to the forums and."

cyclonus11

Vox wrote: »

Meme threads. Kill me now.

EDIT: NaTcH pOtEs AHAHAHA I AM FUNY YOU SEE BECAUSE I SWITCH THE LETTER AROUND :DDDDDDDDDDD

Why do you hate fun?

rotaugen454

Topics concerning player suggested names for Gina's baby... although Natchpotes Soon Bruno would be fitting.

SirAndy

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

For anyone new to the forums and/or the game (I have seen a few announcements lately), let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition.

FortheloveofKrist

MasterSpatula wrote: »

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

Oh @MasterSpatula, did you only read the first 7 words of a post again? You silly. I didn't say they were off limits. I said they should seek out one of the many threads that are already discussing these belabored topics.

What's this again ***, kemosabe?

Nowhere in the words

...let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition. Please search for these threads to avoid bringing up yet another gripe that is already being pummeled into the ground elsewhere on the forums:

does it say avoid creating new threads. Your meaning can be inferred, but "avoid bringing up another gripe" could just as easily be read as "let this topic go."

My read is valid. I get what you're saying now, but your wording was imprecise.

Also, just to be extra pedantic, your first 7 words were "For anyone new to the forums and."

I bet it drives you nuts that the Oxford English dictionary recently added "figuratively" to the definition of literally.

rotaugen454

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

Oh @MasterSpatula, did you only read the first 7 words of a post again? You silly. I didn't say they were off limits. I said they should seek out one of the many threads that are already discussing these belabored topics.

What's this again ***, kemosabe?

Nowhere in the words

...let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition. Please search for these threads to avoid bringing up yet another gripe that is already being pummeled into the ground elsewhere on the forums:

does it say avoid creating new threads. Your meaning can be inferred, but "avoid bringing up another gripe" could just as easily be read as "let this topic go."

My read is valid. I get what you're saying now, but your wording was imprecise.

Also, just to be extra pedantic, your first 7 words were "For anyone new to the forums and."

I bet it drives you nuts that the Oxford English dictionary recently added "figuratively" to the definition of literally.

I was literally just thinking that...

SirAndy

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

I bet it drives you nuts that the Oxford English dictionary recently added "figuratively" to the definition of literally.

R U serials?

MasterSpatula

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

Oh @MasterSpatula, did you only read the first 7 words of a post again? You silly. I didn't say they were off limits. I said they should seek out one of the many threads that are already discussing these belabored topics.

What's this again ***, kemosabe?

Nowhere in the words

...let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition. Please search for these threads to avoid bringing up yet another gripe that is already being pummeled into the ground elsewhere on the forums:

does it say avoid creating new threads. Your meaning can be inferred, but "avoid bringing up another gripe" could just as easily be read as "let this topic go."

My read is valid. I get what you're saying now, but your wording was imprecise.

Also, just to be extra pedantic, your first 7 words were "For anyone new to the forums and."

I bet it drives you nuts that the Oxford English dictionary recently added "figuratively" to the definition of literally.

Wait, you mean there are people who aren't driven nuts by that?

Robbmrp

Unkillable Guards and Slaughterfish....Totally OP....

rotaugen454

The words/phrases OP and nerf...

nine9six

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

Oh @MasterSpatula, did you only read the first 7 words of a post again? You silly. I didn't say they were off limits. I said they should seek out one of the many threads that are already discussing these belabored topics.

What's this again ***, kemosabe?

Nowhere in the words

...let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition. Please search for these threads to avoid bringing up yet another gripe that is already being pummeled into the ground elsewhere on the forums:

does it say avoid creating new threads. Your meaning can be inferred, but "avoid bringing up another gripe" could just as easily be read as "let this topic go."

My read is valid. I get what you're saying now, but your wording was imprecise.

Also, just to be extra pedantic, your first 7 words were "For anyone new to the forums and."

I bet it drives you nuts that the Oxford English dictionary recently added "figuratively" to the definition of literally.

-_- gdi...

Voxicity

cyclonus11 wrote: »

Vox wrote: »

Meme threads. Kill me now.

EDIT: NaTcH pOtEs AHAHAHA I AM FUNY YOU SEE BECAUSE I SWITCH THE LETTER AROUND :DDDDDDDDDDD

Why do you hate fun?

I hate cringe.

Ritzey01

I want my cookie!!!

FortheloveofKrist

Ritzey01 wrote: »

I want my cookie!!!

Alright, alright. Just give me time to head through The Crossing and down The Road so I can get your cookie. It's a dangerous place out there; it's certainly No Country For Old Men.

code65536

Auction House

milkbox

dammit. I read everything *but* the title and thought "nerf Cormac McCarthy" was the funniest non-sequitur ever.

Abeille

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

FortheloveofKrist wrote: »

MasterSpatula wrote: »

You hear that, folks? From this point forward, only @FortheloveofKrist-approved topics are allowed.

Or how about this: Instead of declaring any over-discussed topics off-limits, we could strive for a bit better balance. Don't create a thread about PVP lag when there are already 6 on the front page; don't go into a thread about crafting and start declaring that any attention ZOS pays to any subject other than PVP lag means they just don't care about PVP; don't insist that the graphics team and the CS team and the forum mods all should have 100% of their time diverted into fixing PVP lag;

But on the other hand, also don't let the topic of PVP lag fade away so they forget it's important to us. You know, show a little balance.

(Just choosing one example. I shouldn't have to say that, but experience with this forum has taught me it's better to be safe.)

Oh @MasterSpatula, did you only read the first 7 words of a post again? You silly. I didn't say they were off limits. I said they should seek out one of the many threads that are already discussing these belabored topics.

What's this again ***, kemosabe?

Nowhere in the words

...let's go over which topics and complaints are dead horses beaten severely beyond recognition. Please search for these threads to avoid bringing up yet another gripe that is already being pummeled into the ground elsewhere on the forums:

does it say avoid creating new threads. Your meaning can be inferred, but "avoid bringing up another gripe" could just as easily be read as "let this topic go."

My read is valid. I get what you're saying now, but your wording was imprecise.

Also, just to be extra pedantic, your first 7 words were "For anyone new to the forums and."

I bet it drives you nuts that the Oxford English dictionary recently added "figuratively" to the definition of literally.

They did WHAT!?

This drives ME nuts, and I'm not even a native English speaker