Perhaps the OP should enlighten the developer staff with his infinite game designing wisdom? Perhaps even try to explain why they are so bad, and what possibly could be done to make them better?
Someone who judges others so harshly as the OP does, better have the background that puts weight to his claims. Else it's just another infuriating little kid on the room that spits curses at the screen.Nothing wrong with my templar, maybe I play another game?
OP, please enlighten me with the facts on which you base your rant.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/209652/why-templar-is-the-worst-designed-class-in-eso-long/p1
Are you 2 seriously saying that you have never seen the hundreds of threads about how awful the templar is?
I've seen the threads ever since day 1 of release. That's not the point though, the OP is talking about how bad the developers are and how they should be fired for how templars are, something that indicates that he himself think he knows how it should be, how else can you say someone should be fired for doing a bad job? You clearly have to know a lot about game development in order to judge other game developers so harshly.
This thread isn't constructive, and as such gets non-constructive answers. I'd say we're on topic then
I don't think ZOS would take OP's feedback into consideration, though. They didn't post on the existing templar threads, and they have a lot of constructive feedback in them.
A lot of people think that the developer has to answer the thread for them to see the problem. I agree that they should at least give some feedback, but the forum's existence alone should be proof enough that they read the feedbacks that come in, only that they have to be constructive. The problem is that most of the time they don't have anything exact to come up with, per example the templar train bot problem, they didn't say too much but a GM I spoke to said that the developers was using up a medium sized farm of coffee beans per day trying to figure out what to do about the problem.
I don't think people understand the time and effort that goes into producing a game, especially an ongoing MMO. Do you want the developers to come up with solutions and balancing things out as best they can, or do you want them to spend their time on the forums, answering the same questions over and over again?
I want them to take our feedback into consideration, that's all.
Judging by the latest changes on PTS, they are not doing that. The little feedback they take into consideration is being misused. A good example is the BoL nerf. Somehow, after "watching a few streamers" (yes, they said that, but I'm on mobile right now so going after the exact quote would take too long), they took the feedback that "BoL needs a line of sight limitation so people won't heal through walls in Cyrodiil" and somehow made that into "Better make BoL heal one less target but not cost any less magicka".
Not to mention Wrobel's templar vision for templar. An "immovable" class that "protects their house", in a game with action-based combat.
I won't go into detail because, as I said, I'm on mobile right now. But rest assured, the solutions they are coming up with are not really addressing the issues (Bugged skills? Low mobility? Better increase the dps on one of the slow-casting skills!).
I don't want them to answer the same questions over and over. I want them to answer at least once, and to at least say that they will review Wrobel's "immovable templar" vision to see if it fits an action-based combat and if it matches the player's wishes for the class.
The problem as I see it, is that the developer's overall vision and what they consider the best moves, doesn't necessarily coincide with what the players think should be done. I just returned to ESO, I played it in the beginning, but after some months I left due to the game not being what I wanted of it.
When I returned, I saw that they've made numerous changes to the game. They've changed how things are displayed, clarified what does what, tweaked the massive imbalance in difficulty on several places, understood that Craglorn was a mistake (forced grouping; bad idea) and numerous smaller changes to their game, making the game feel less blocky and more fluent.
So they do make changes, and they do listen to feedback, far more than many other game companies I've seen (such as EA and Ubisoft, and the ever so arrogant Blizzard). That however doesn't necessarily mean you agree with what they're doing and how they are doing things, and in your view it doesn't address the underlying issue, that's fine. But if you do disagree on it, at least it has to be constructive and well written to address the underlying issue, and how it might be changed. The OP doesn't do any of that, he just tells the developers to find another line of work because they don't know what they're doing. That's neither constructive nor helpful.
Who on team ZOS is responsible for designing the templar? Seriously, by far the worst designed class in any game I have ever played. Whoever is responsible for creating this pile of **** has no business in the gaming industry. Absolutely none what so ever. Please resign from your position and consider working at a car wash or something. The gaming industry is just not for you.
Who on team ZOS is responsible for designing the templar? Seriously, by far the worst designed class in any game I have ever played. Whoever is responsible for creating this pile of **** has no business in the gaming industry. Absolutely none what so ever. Please resign from your position and consider working at a car wash or something. The gaming industry is just not for you.
Who on team ZOS is responsible for designing the templar? Seriously, by far the worst designed class in any game I have ever played. Whoever is responsible for creating this pile of **** has no business in the gaming industry. Absolutely none what so ever. Please resign from your position and consider working at a car wash or something. The gaming industry is just not for you.
We are fine with threads with criticism of classes and builds however, as has already been stated, we would appreciate that these threads stay constructive and aren't posted simply to flame and bash.
Since the opening statement there has been the discussion of the topic of this thread has been a huge improvement so we would like to keep this thread open for discussion of the class. However this is just a reminder that attacks on people, zos or players, are not tolerated on the forums. This provides no contribution to the discussion of player class.
As an additional note and reminder, threads "Locked for Review" are locked for a review of content and are not permanently locked.
Thank you for your understanding.
We are fine with threads with criticism of classes and builds however, as has already been stated, we would appreciate that these threads stay constructive and aren't posted simply to flame and bash.
Since the opening statement there has been the discussion of the topic of this thread has been a huge improvement so we would like to keep this thread open for discussion of the class. However this is just a reminder that attacks on people, zos or players, are not tolerated on the forums. This provides no contribution to the discussion of player class.
As an additional note and reminder, threads "Locked for Review" are locked for a review of content and are not permanently locked.
Thank you for your understanding.
GreenGhostMan wrote: »Aren't they buffing templar DPS in TG patch?
BOL is the only nerf coming, right?
(not being sarcastic, honest questions)
GreenGhostMan wrote: »Aren't they buffing templar DPS in TG patch?
BOL is the only nerf coming, right?
(not being sarcastic, honest questions)
There are buffs and there are nerfs. Some of the changes coming are good to one degree or another, some are bad, some are indifferent. Of all of the classes, I'm the most disappointed in the Templar changes. Based on the TG update changes, I see the other 3 classes as being fairly well balanced internally and against each other, and Templars lagging behind.GreenGhostMan wrote: »Aren't they buffing templar DPS in TG patch?
BOL is the only nerf coming, right?
(not being sarcastic, honest questions)
Caius Drusus Imperial DK (DC) Bragg Ironhand Orc Temp (DC) Neesha Stalks-Shadows Argonian NB (EP) Falidir Altmer Sorcr (AD) J'zharka Khajiit NB (AD) |
Isabeau Runeseer Breton Sorc (DC) Fevassa Dunmer DK (EP) Manut Redguard Temp (AD) Tylera the Summoner Altmer Sorc (EP) Svari Snake-Blood Nord DK (AD) |
Ashlyn D'Elyse Breton NB (EP) Filindria Bosmer Temp (DC) Vigbjorn the Wanderer Nord Warden (EP) Hrokki Winterborn Breton Warden (DC) Basks-in-the-Sunshine Argonian Temp |
Templars get great... After you put time in them and capitalize on their strengths. You cannot just reach v16, throw on some mismatch partial bonus set gear and run into dungeons expecting to come out on top. thats not how things work. lol True... templars have some serious bug issues. but so does every other class. Templar dot heals locking u out of healing for 4 seconds, Leaping around can get u stuck in animations and stuck in all sorts of wierd positions, being the worst bugs right now.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/213734/bugs-compendium-of-current-bugs-exploits-maintained-daily#latest
here are some of the issues in a link
I understand the fustration. I'm a sorc and when my main ultimate won't fire anything off and it locks me out of my skills on a boss where everyone is counting on me, I freak out x.x
But rest assured, the solutions they are coming up with are not really addressing the issues (Bugged skills? Low mobility? Better increase the dps on one of the slow-casting skills!).