Subtext: not everybody does have access to a trade kiosk. The prices are too high for most guilds to afford, a direct consequence of the entire system of guilds bidding against each other. A possible solution would be to get rid of bidding altogether and replace it with a different system.You know, we want to make sure that everybody has access to these
This is a desirable feature of the bidding system. Guilds can choose which kiosk they want and, if they win, control their location. I think maybe he said "large guilds" because the GMs of the large guilds have been the most vocal and visible.Part of the issue is, you know, a lot of the large guilds want to control the traders - and they can with their bids
Yes, exactly. But as others have mentioned, this isn't just large guilds that don't enjoy this.But the other side of that is, you know, they don't really enjoy having to wait for the server to come up to see if they got their thing, and then have to scramble around
This last part, I want to address directly to @ZOS_RichLambert: thank you for taking the issue seriously and trying to come up with a good system. But please, fix the kiosk flip time first.so we want to try and find a happy medium
Another reason I think this is a an innocent case of poorly-chosen wording is the logic of the whole statement. You can't say you want to find a happy medium between making sure everybody has access and ensuring that large guilds can dominate access. The two concepts are mutually exclusive.silvereyes wrote: »The "control" verbiage was unfortunate because it's a loaded term. But his tone of voice seemed so innocent that I have a hard time believing it was intended in the angry populist sense of the word.
silvereyes wrote: »Another reason I think this is a an innocent case of poorly-chosen wording is the logic of the whole statement. You can't say you want to find a happy medium between making sure everybody has access and ensuring that large guilds can dominate access. The two concepts are mutually exclusive.silvereyes wrote: »The "control" verbiage was unfortunate because it's a loaded term. But his tone of voice seemed so innocent that I have a hard time believing it was intended in the angry populist sense of the word.
It makes much more sense if he meant that they want to design a system that combines access for everybody with the power to choose your guild's location.
o.O That can't be good.GorraShatan wrote: »Apparently my post on the subject go removed by ZOS without a word as to why. Doesn't speak well to how this is being handled.
GorraShatan wrote: »Apparently my post on the subject go removed by ZOS without a word as to why. Doesn't speak well to how this is being handled.
This should help a bit with troll bids like that one guild with no listings taking up the Rawl and Mournhold spots the last two weeks on PC/NA. Although some folks might still think it's worth 10k to troll, I don't know.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Crafting & Economy
General
- The minimum bid and the buyout price for a Guild Trader with no bids have been increased to 10,000 gold from 100 gold.
silvereyes wrote: »From the latest PTS patch notes:This should help a bit with troll bids like that one guild with no listings taking up the Rawl and Mournhold spots the last two weeks on PC/NA. Although some folks might still think it's worth 10k to troll, I don't know.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Crafting & Economy
General
- The minimum bid and the buyout price for a Guild Trader with no bids have been increased to 10,000 gold from 100 gold.
50k was my gut feeling as well. I drop 10k+ on respecs all the time without even blinking. To someone with a steady in-game income, 10k is nothing.silvereyes wrote: »From the latest PTS patch notes:This should help a bit with troll bids like that one guild with no listings taking up the Rawl and Mournhold spots the last two weeks on PC/NA. Although some folks might still think it's worth 10k to troll, I don't know.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Crafting & Economy
General
- The minimum bid and the buyout price for a Guild Trader with no bids have been increased to 10,000 gold from 100 gold.
The change to 10k won't discourage anyone from trolling. A meaningful change would start at no less than 50k to ensure that guilds with stores get most of these spots.
Sallington wrote: »Does @Gidorick still play ESO, or has he left by now? Just look through his posts for how to make this game, socially, 10000% better.
ElfFromSpace wrote: »Which of these improvements would you rate as the #1 highest priority?
ElfFromSpace wrote: »Which of these improvements would you rate as the #1 highest priority?
Does this person still play?
GorraShatan wrote: »Apparently my post on the subject go removed by ZOS without a word as to why. Doesn't speak well to how this is being handled.
ElfFromSpace wrote: »Which of these improvements would you rate as the #1 highest priority?
Does this person still play?