ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »We can confirm that this is indeed the intended name and not a typo. As @Aetherderius mentioned, you'll meet Daedrats in the Imperial City.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »I think the lore monks voted us out of canon a long while ago. We're in the illustrious company of Redguard and Battlespire and considered extended universe at best. =/ we've got the loriest lore master of all lores, however, so who cares but the monks?!
Have a daedrat-on-a-stick instead!
wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »I have never seen a daedric rat in any of the ES games I have played and I hope I never do while it is still living.
Brasseurfb16_ESO wrote: »wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »I have never seen a daedric rat in any of the ES games I have played and I hope I never do while it is still living.
Aren't the scamps considered as the rats from the Daedric planes?
starkerealm wrote: »Brasseurfb16_ESO wrote: »wenxue2222b16_ESO wrote: »I have never seen a daedric rat in any of the ES games I have played and I hope I never do while it is still living.
Aren't the scamps considered as the rats from the Daedric planes?
Yeah, but Scamp Souffle was too horrifying to consider.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »I think the lore monks voted us out of canon a long while ago.
By the smart lore folks. There are still lots of people out there who hasten to call ESO a lore abomination whenever the topic comes up.anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »I think the lore monks voted us out of canon a long while ago.
Nope... there used to be a lot of caution among the lore freaks regarding ESO in early 2014, prior to beta, but as of now ESO lore is generally accepted as canon (due to its quality).
They're all canon, 100%. Some people just swear by the main series. Actually, Redguard and Battlespire have more credibility because they were made by Bethesda. I think ESO falls together with the books and the mobile games.starkerealm wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »I think the lore monks voted us out of canon a long while ago. We're in the illustrious company of Redguard and Battlespire and considered extended universe at best. =/ we've got the loriest lore master of all lores, however, so who cares but the monks?!
Have a daedrat-on-a-stick instead!
Wait, I could have sworn I saw stuff in the numbered games talking about the destruction of the Battlespire. I know Stros M'Kai has gotten stray nods in lore books outside of Redguard. (Not counting it's reappearance in ESO.)
So... yeah, this seems really weird to me.
AlienDiplomat wrote: »KhajitFurTrader wrote: »Buttercup: Westley, what about the D.R.O.U.S.'s?
starkerealm wrote: »AlienDiplomat wrote: »KhajitFurTrader wrote: »Buttercup: Westley, what about the D.R.O.U.S.'s?
Pfff, that's just a Skeever.
I have a feeling this is dead-on. Like, this is a rat kebab, but it tastes as bad as a piece of daedric buttock.KhajitFurTrader wrote: »A pun on "daedra" and "dead rat", perhaps? IDK
I wouldn't want either one as a snack, though.
Soooo not what I want to have, mate...
Eeewww... That sounds like "I suck male anatomical features for white crystalline powder"tinythinker wrote: »Why not? For me it depends on the level and the kind of attribute boost it gives. My characters would eat Molag's Soul Fried Dough Balls if they offered an extra 10,000 Max Health and 8,000 Max Magicka and Stamina. And not just on the the 20th of Evening Star.
And why stop at daedrats?Welp, new creatures. How interesting. I suppose we didn't know about Xivilai before ESIV: Oblivion either !
Eeewww... That sounds like "I suck male anatomical features for white crystalline powder"tinythinker wrote: »Why not? For me it depends on the level and the kind of attribute boost it gives. My characters would eat Molag's Soul Fried Dough Balls if they offered an extra 10,000 Max Health and 8,000 Max Magicka and Stamina. And not just on the the 20th of Evening Star.
KhajitFurTrader wrote: »And why stop at daedrats?Welp, new creatures. How interesting. I suppose we didn't know about Xivilai before ESIV: Oblivion either !
Just wait until we see daedrabbits ("Oh, you wascally daedwab... ow! ow!! OW!!"), daedracoons, and daedrattlesnakes!
Coming soon to a store near you, The Elder Scrolls Online: Terminators Unlimited!
@tinythinker
Dammit, you made me snort coffee out of my nose... Schweddy balls...
They're all canon, 100%. Some people just swear by the main series. Actually, Redguard and Battlespire have more credibility because they were made by Bethesda. I think ESO falls together with the books and the mobile games.
So this is ESO lore not true TES Lore, as the term daedrat appears nowhere on TES lore sites or other sources of lore information that I can find.ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »We can confirm that this is indeed the intended name and not a typo. As @Aetherderius mentioned, you'll meet Daedrats in the Imperial City.
Lawrence_Schick wrote: »Phrastus of Elinhir says, "Daedrats are vermin from Oblivion that sometimes sneak into Nirn through Oblivion Gates or portals. Dremora think they're kind of cute, so if they catch them they kill them swiftly instead of torturing them, like they do with loose banekin."
I know that. What I was trying to say is that for people who think only Bethesda creates "true" lore and everyone else is writing official fanfiction, Redguard lore is more acceptable than ESO or the books (even though they're extensively referenced in Skyrim, as you noted). Personally I think this perspective is silly and robs the lore of many great new findings. As a Bosmer fan, I was delighted to learn all I could about them from ESO.LadyNerevar wrote: »They're all canon, 100%. Some people just swear by the main series. Actually, Redguard and Battlespire have more credibility because they were made by Bethesda. I think ESO falls together with the books and the mobile games.
All of it is all canon. The books built the backbone of Skyrim's lore. They're also one of two things officially called "canon" by Bethesda.
The other is ESO.