newtinmpls wrote: »Superior in what sense? The original looked quite cuddly/pettable which I find 'superior'.
Technical superiority. I did not intend to touch upon what you prefer. Reasons for the change are with ZOS. Could be start of ever improved texture changes, performance or perhaps these races simply always had inferior/placeholder textures.Aesthetics > graphics. Nearly every time.
If they wanted to improve textures, they could have done it without changing the style. I still don't understand the point of this redesign.
When I point out one single thing it DOES NOT mean I am suggesting ANYTHING ELSE!!!
The improvement to textures is apparent. The reasons for the change or what you prefer is unknown to me ... and the latter I don't give a f'ing care about.
It's PEGI 16 right now, but it will be PEGI 18 from patch 1.6 onwards, which is what we are discussing. When I downloaded the PTS, I had to sit through a screen informing me that the rating of the game had changed. I've no idea why this game should need to be rated 18, but the same thing happened with Skyrim - it was released rated 15 in the UK and then got upped to 18 with the patch which introduced killcams.I'm in a nitpicky mood today. It's 16+ in Europe.Why in Oblivion does a game which is rated Mature in North America and 18 in Europe need to be "family-friendly" anyway?newtinmpls wrote: »Oh come on - removal of a belly button makes it family-friendly ??!!?? <banging head against wall>
I could not agree more.bellanca6561n wrote: »Problem is the first technical issue that needed addressing was not textures. I think most folks would agree that the most glaring flaw was due to their failure to adjust material properties with the dye patch. Thus we have cloth that looks like metal, leather that looks like metal and some metal that looks like cloth.
Second most important issue was clean up after the palette reassignment. Dye colors as set at dye stations and awarded as achievements are extremely variable. There is no consistency in how they appear on each armor piece or in each slot on each armor piece. Many color slots don't even work.
Oh, right. Totally forgot. And I didn't know about Skyrim, it was always 18 here, so I guess that 15 rating was BBFC?It's PEGI 16 right now, but it will be PEGI 18 from patch 1.6 onwards, which is what we are discussing. When I downloaded the PTS, I had to sit through a screen informing me that the rating of the game had changed. I've no idea why this game should need to be rated 18, but the same thing happened with Skyrim - it was released rated 15 in the UK and then got upped to 18 with the patch which introduced killcams.I'm in a nitpicky mood today. It's 16+ in Europe.Why in Oblivion does a game which is rated Mature in North America and 18 in Europe need to be "family-friendly" anyway?newtinmpls wrote: »Oh come on - removal of a belly button makes it family-friendly ??!!?? <banging head against wall>
bellanca6561n wrote: »People were using the more revealing armor styles as clothing, not armor.
Offering customers the ability to create characters with stunning physiques just to cover them completely, even out of combat, is just not healthy.
In fairness, creating allure and walking that line between sexy and trashy requires talent beyond most artists working in the industry. Tera is perhaps an extreme example of this
But the art direction is this game is so frequently outstanding that it puzzles me that they are unable to handle this issue better. And they have. There was nothing wrong or trashy with Redguard light as it is.
bellanca6561n wrote: »
But, again, thanks to the cash shop, this is what she looks like while doing battle now...and to think some players got all red faced angry over the so-called "boob window" on female Orc heavy armor...