Would you guys be allowed to show how you go about world building in the show, from concept to implementation?
Maybe showing a bit of the construction set you use while we're at it, if you can? (even if it's just screenies, that would be OK for me...)
I'd love a bit of technology show off
(Sorry, I haven't read all the thread up to this point, so if anyone already suggested this, sorry again. If that's the case, just disregard this )
1. Sorcerer pets may be horrid atm and spell crafting has confirmed other summoned pets. Do any of these include stamina based pet lines?
AlexDougherty wrote: »1. Sorcerer pets may be horrid atm and spell crafting has confirmed other summoned pets. Do any of these include stamina based pet lines?
@Kraven Those are Familiars or Summoned Creatures, not pets.
Pets are vanity creatures such as the monkey, mudcrab or Dwemer Sphere, who do nothing but follow you.
People need to differenciate between pets and familiars, don't use the same term for both.
AlexDougherty wrote: »1. Sorcerer pets may be horrid atm and spell crafting has confirmed other summoned pets. Do any of these include stamina based pet lines?
@Kraven Those are Familiars or Summoned Creatures, not pets.
Pets are vanity creatures such as the monkey, mudcrab or Dwemer Sphere, who do nothing but follow you.
People need to differenciate between pets and familiars, don't use the same term for both.
Combat pets, then. Vanity doesn't count for anything as they're useless and simple vanity items. Pet classes have existed in games for decades I don't really care whether or not you like the terminology. Combat pets, mage pets, undead pets, elemental pets, ranger pets, or whatever are not the same as vanity fluff.
Dwemer sphere, dwemer spider, monkey, mudcrab, pig, or ice *** are all vanity fluff. Regardless, the topic is the AuA, I asked my questions.
That distinction only works in TES lore. In MMOs in general, creatures that follow the character around are all called pets, and the MMO distinction between type is combat pets vs vanity pets. People who come from MMOs will call them pets because that is MMO standard, and there is nothing wrong with that terminology.AlexDougherty wrote: »1. Sorcerer pets may be horrid atm and spell crafting has confirmed other summoned pets. Do any of these include stamina based pet lines?
@Kraven Those are Familiars or Summoned Creatures, not pets.
Pets are vanity creatures such as the monkey, mudcrab or Dwemer Sphere, who do nothing but follow you.
People need to differenciate between pets and familiars, don't use the same term for both.
Combat pets, then. Vanity doesn't count for anything as they're useless and simple vanity items. Pet classes have existed in games for decades I don't really care whether or not you like the terminology. Combat pets, mage pets, undead pets, elemental pets, ranger pets, or whatever are not the same as vanity fluff.
Dwemer sphere, dwemer spider, monkey, mudcrab, pig, or ice *** are all vanity fluff. Regardless, the topic is the AuA, I asked my questions.
No.. NOT PETS. They are SUMMONED DAEDRA who according to lore will turn on you the minute you let your guard down. (Divines help me, I am agreeing with @AlexDougherty). Kraven you are agreeing when you put the word "vanity" and "summoned" in front of "pets". Just call them the right names, "familiars" vs "pets".
That distinction only works in TES lore. In MMOs in general, creatures that follow the character around are all called pets, and the MMO distinction between type is combat pets vs vanity pets. People who come from MMOs will call them pets because that is MMO standard, and there is nothing wrong with that terminology.
Would that be the familiars listed here as "combat pets"?That distinction only works in TES lore. In MMOs in general, creatures that follow the character around are all called pets, and the MMO distinction between type is combat pets vs vanity pets. People who come from MMOs will call them pets because that is MMO standard, and there is nothing wrong with that terminology.
My (bear, sabre, eagle) familiars in Lotro would be highly incensed to read your travesty of the distinction. As would the NPCs I charmed in EQ with my druid and chanter. (On the other hand, my turtle, fox, bird and snake would love you.) By your definition, our horses are pets. (summoned and their tails "follow" us around when we ride them.)
Hey everytime i try to login to my downloader it says an access code has been sent to my email but everytime i check its not there
That distinction only works in TES lore. In MMOs in general, creatures that follow the character around are all called pets, and the MMO distinction between type is combat pets vs vanity pets. People who come from MMOs will call them pets because that is MMO standard, and there is nothing wrong with that terminology.AlexDougherty wrote: »1. Sorcerer pets may be horrid atm and spell crafting has confirmed other summoned pets. Do any of these include stamina based pet lines?
@Kraven Those are Familiars or Summoned Creatures, not pets.
Pets are vanity creatures such as the monkey, mudcrab or Dwemer Sphere, who do nothing but follow you.
People need to differenciate between pets and familiars, don't use the same term for both.
Combat pets, then. Vanity doesn't count for anything as they're useless and simple vanity items. Pet classes have existed in games for decades I don't really care whether or not you like the terminology. Combat pets, mage pets, undead pets, elemental pets, ranger pets, or whatever are not the same as vanity fluff.
Dwemer sphere, dwemer spider, monkey, mudcrab, pig, or ice *** are all vanity fluff. Regardless, the topic is the AuA, I asked my questions.
No.. NOT PETS. They are SUMMONED DAEDRA who according to lore will turn on you the minute you let your guard down. (Divines help me, I am agreeing with @AlexDougherty). Kraven you are agreeing when you put the word "vanity" and "summoned" in front of "pets". Just call them the right names, "familiars" vs "pets".
AlexDougherty wrote: »1. Sorcerer pets may be horrid atm and spell crafting has confirmed other summoned pets. Do any of these include stamina based pet lines?
@Kraven Those are Familiars or Summoned Creatures, not pets.
Pets are vanity creatures such as the monkey, mudcrab or Dwemer Sphere, who do nothing but follow you.
People need to differenciate between pets and familiars, don't use the same term for both.
Combat pets, then. Vanity doesn't count for anything as they're useless and simple vanity items. Pet classes have existed in games for decades I don't really care whether or not you like the terminology. Combat pets, mage pets, undead pets, elemental pets, ranger pets, or whatever are not the same as vanity fluff.
Dwemer sphere, dwemer spider, monkey, mudcrab, pig, or ice *** are all vanity fluff. Regardless, the topic is the AuA, I asked my questions.
No.. NOT PETS. They are SUMMONED DAEDRA who according to lore will turn on you the minute you let your guard down. (Divines help me, I am agreeing with @AlexDougherty). Kraven you are agreeing when you put the word "vanity" and "summoned" in front of "pets". Just call them the right names, "familiars" vs "pets".
eventide03b14a_ESO wrote: »[...]
2. Any chance that you add mantle support for ESO?
[...]
They already tried to implement mantles, I.e. they created some models, but they had to realize that mantles of sufficent graphical quality take up far too much prossecing power, (they managed to have a total of two mantles on-screen at once). They'd love to do it but it's currently not technically possible.
Staed by one of the devs at the guild summit.
Can you provide the time-stamp for this please?
What are mantles?eventide03b14a_ESO wrote: »[...]
2. Any chance that you add mantle support for ESO?
[...]
They already tried to implement mantles, I.e. they created some models, but they had to realize that mantles of sufficent graphical quality take up far too much prossecing power, (they managed to have a total of two mantles on-screen at once). They'd love to do it but it's currently not technically possible.
Staed by one of the devs at the guild summit.
Can you provide the time-stamp for this please?
@eventide03b14a_ESO It starts at 1:17:10
MornaBaine wrote: »Exactly HOW is the Justice System going to affect vampires and werewolves? WILL vampires be KOS to guards at Stage 4? WILL there be any changes to the Stage timers to account for the affects of the Justice System on vampires? WILL there be a way to disguise vampirism? WILL transformed werewolves be KOS to guards? How long will their "heat" last after they transform back to human?