HappyTheCamper wrote: »I don’t like making Daedric princes into polymorphs. Random players shouldn’t be able to change their appearance to reflect gods. The Umaril one was already on the fence for me personally.
HappyTheCamper wrote: »I don’t like making Daedric princes into polymorphs. Random players shouldn’t be able to change their appearance to reflect gods. The Umaril one was already on the fence for me personally.
HappyTheCamper wrote: »I don’t like making Daedric princes into polymorphs. Random players shouldn’t be able to change their appearance to reflect gods. The Umaril one was already on the fence for me personally.
I agree, polymorphs should just be generalized. I'm not a fan of polymorphs in general, but a polymorph to become a specific character is kind of weird. I don't see the appeal, and Daedric princes especially, it looks way too silly seeing players running around looking like that.
thadjarvis wrote: »Is it any less silly seeing 10000s of avatars that all defeated Bal running around?
thanks for the video, gonna grab the cultist senche instead
snip
- for the price of 2500 gem mount and 400 gem polymorph, the Dark Anchor effect should be part of roaring, and/or should be bigger and form into solid matter from the ghostly effect.
- It's very expensive combo. The 2500 gems mount has not enough epic effects for the price, so the Dark Anchor effect could add value to that price, without need to spend more.
- What if my character has Xivkyn polymorph and wants to appear with Dark Anchor effect on this mount? Not possible, and it limits roleplay options. Dark Anchor effect should be toggle in Collections. BONUS: this effect could be even applied to any mount you own if you also have Molag Bal polymorph, and could be selected/disabled in Customized Actions > Mount summons. For that awesome feature, I would purchase this mount even now with all other flaws I see in it