MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »SwaminoNowlino wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »
Xbox one x will as good as most high end pcs if not better it will render true 4k gaming and 60 fps or better depending how dev choose to use the extra power all you need to do is look at the specs buddy
Don't feed the "PC Master" trolls. And especially don't feed them with advertised specs for the One X. I've always played on console, but I am by no means a fan boy for one platform over the other. Honestly, if the One X delivers 50% of what is actually advertised when its actually in use I will be surprised. The PS4 Pro was supposed to revolutionize gaming, and it never lived up to the performance metrics advertised. The One X is highly unlikely to outperform the PS4 in any appreciable way. I'd love for it to, but to get similar performance on a PC, you would need a graphics card that costs more than the entire console. So they're definitely going cheap on the build somewhere (I see red rings of death in the future). But that's all just speculation. And not the point of this thread anyways.
TLDR: Console players are well aware of the console certification process. The console certification process excuse doesn't even fit, since Gina told us they weren't submitting it ASAP, but sticking it in a scheduled incremental instead. All us console players want is to get emergency patches for completely broken content in a timely fashion. If it costs ZOS money, then oh well. That's what they get for releasing busted content despite being warned.
Lol it already has they showed it off it it's up to dev to use the extra power but it's deff there
XB1X specs are on par with a mid-level gaming PC (GPU is usually the equivalent of an X60 Nvidia card). Consoles always release as mid-end gaming PCs. The XB1X is no different (most games will still be running at 30 fps). The cost to create an actual "high end" console would be enormous. Console manufacturers use cheap hardware and then game devs optimize games to squeeze out every last drop of performance from the hardware.
People also forget we get Bugs PC players don't get like,Minor slayer being broken.hamburgerler76 wrote: »disintegr8 wrote: »The one advantage I get out of receiving updates after PC release is that I know what bugs I need to be prepared for and what fixes I can look forward to. Releasing the updates on PC before console does not mean issues don't reach console, just that we get them at a later date.
I will admit that I like to look at the PC release notes so I know what to expect when things come to console and I am generally aware, through using the forums, of most issues we are likely to face.
Maybe this means that PC users get to be 'guinea pigs' but it definitely does not stop console users from getting the same bugs.
Yea we may know what's coming but for some reason every pc owner thinks they beta test for us we get all the bugs and deal with them longer hands down.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Console patches are delayed a few weeks for almost every multiplat game. Not sure why this is troubling you now. It's part of the territory of owning a console. Sony and MS make a mess out of patching.
Not sure how you arrived at this conclusion.
Official MS protocol is to queue a patch for verification for a week or so....
Patch released on PC instantly.
Patch on console can be sent to MS at this time for verification, So it should be week but nothing...
Zos confirm will be mid July for a fix that is know not to work on PC as of yesterday but still proceeds....
Arrives on console months later, as experienced by all on these platforms...will not work anyway, actual fix will be deployed later on, no ETA on an actual fix.
How do you arrive at "Sony and MS make a mess out of patching"? Serious question.
Again other developers have delivered patches in the promised time (that actually work) in far shorter time frames than ZOS.
And again....No console patch has ever ever ever arrived within "A few weeks" All Patches to date have come 2 months down the line at best, at present we never got an actual fix post homestead of any use to fix EG Maw being broken, it got ignored again and again until over 100 days later Morrowind dropped and low and behold it's still shite.
Failing to see how this is a MS and Sony issue, They just host and deliver. That is all, everything else is on ZOS.
PC players seem to think their world will end by consoles being looked after better, Almost like a child being told his parents are having another kid...AAAhhhhh My toys will be neglected.
Most of your patches come 2 weeks after the PC patch. That's 1 week for testing on PC and 1 week for certification (they don't want to have to be fixing two patches simultaneously). That seems pretty reasonable to me.
If some patches take longer than that, it's probably because they need to get more testing in on the PC side (see the Battlegrounds patch right now). Sure, in an ideal world they would have a large team for each platform, but that isn't feasible.
hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Console patches are delayed a few weeks for almost every multiplat game. Not sure why this is troubling you now. It's part of the territory of owning a console. Sony and MS make a mess out of patching.
Not sure how you arrived at this conclusion.
Official MS protocol is to queue a patch for verification for a week or so....
Patch released on PC instantly.
Patch on console can be sent to MS at this time for verification, So it should be week but nothing...
Zos confirm will be mid July for a fix that is know not to work on PC as of yesterday but still proceeds....
Arrives on console months later, as experienced by all on these platforms...will not work anyway, actual fix will be deployed later on, no ETA on an actual fix.
How do you arrive at "Sony and MS make a mess out of patching"? Serious question.
Again other developers have delivered patches in the promised time (that actually work) in far shorter time frames than ZOS.
And again....No console patch has ever ever ever arrived within "A few weeks" All Patches to date have come 2 months down the line at best, at present we never got an actual fix post homestead of any use to fix EG Maw being broken, it got ignored again and again until over 100 days later Morrowind dropped and low and behold it's still shite.
Failing to see how this is a MS and Sony issue, They just host and deliver. That is all, everything else is on ZOS.
PC players seem to think their world will end by consoles being looked after better, Almost like a child being told his parents are having another kid...AAAhhhhh My toys will be neglected.
Most of your patches come 2 weeks after the PC patch. That's 1 week for testing on PC and 1 week for certification (they don't want to have to be fixing two patches simultaneously). That seems pretty reasonable to me.
If some patches take longer than that, it's probably because they need to get more testing in on the PC side (see the Battlegrounds patch right now). Sure, in an ideal world they would have a large team for each platform, but that isn't feasible.
Again this is only dlc release and not what we are talking about bug fixes that you get in a day or a week we wait months for. For what zos called a incremental patch witch they bundle a bunch of pc patchest together to save money on cert please understand that
hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »SwaminoNowlino wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »
Xbox one x will as good as most high end pcs if not better it will render true 4k gaming and 60 fps or better depending how dev choose to use the extra power all you need to do is look at the specs buddy
Don't feed the "PC Master" trolls. And especially don't feed them with advertised specs for the One X. I've always played on console, but I am by no means a fan boy for one platform over the other. Honestly, if the One X delivers 50% of what is actually advertised when its actually in use I will be surprised. The PS4 Pro was supposed to revolutionize gaming, and it never lived up to the performance metrics advertised. The One X is highly unlikely to outperform the PS4 in any appreciable way. I'd love for it to, but to get similar performance on a PC, you would need a graphics card that costs more than the entire console. So they're definitely going cheap on the build somewhere (I see red rings of death in the future). But that's all just speculation. And not the point of this thread anyways.
TLDR: Console players are well aware of the console certification process. The console certification process excuse doesn't even fit, since Gina told us they weren't submitting it ASAP, but sticking it in a scheduled incremental instead. All us console players want is to get emergency patches for completely broken content in a timely fashion. If it costs ZOS money, then oh well. That's what they get for releasing busted content despite being warned.
Lol it already has they showed it off it it's up to dev to use the extra power but it's deff there
XB1X specs are on par with a mid-level gaming PC (GPU is usually the equivalent of an X60 Nvidia card). Consoles always release as mid-end gaming PCs. The XB1X is no different (most games will still be running at 30 fps). The cost to create an actual "high end" console would be enormous. Console manufacturers use cheap hardware and then game devs optimize games to squeeze out every last drop of performance from the hardware.
Ide love to see the mid teir pc that can hit 4k 60 fps on games like battle field for 500 bucks I'll get that instead lol
hamburgerler76 wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Console patches are delayed a few weeks for almost every multiplat game. Not sure why this is troubling you now. It's part of the territory of owning a console. Sony and MS make a mess out of patching.
Not sure how you arrived at this conclusion.
Official MS protocol is to queue a patch for verification for a week or so....
Patch released on PC instantly.
Patch on console can be sent to MS at this time for verification, So it should be week but nothing...
Zos confirm will be mid July for a fix that is know not to work on PC as of yesterday but still proceeds....
Arrives on console months later, as experienced by all on these platforms...will not work anyway, actual fix will be deployed later on, no ETA on an actual fix.
How do you arrive at "Sony and MS make a mess out of patching"? Serious question.
Again other developers have delivered patches in the promised time (that actually work) in far shorter time frames than ZOS.
And again....No console patch has ever ever ever arrived within "A few weeks" All Patches to date have come 2 months down the line at best, at present we never got an actual fix post homestead of any use to fix EG Maw being broken, it got ignored again and again until over 100 days later Morrowind dropped and low and behold it's still shite.
Failing to see how this is a MS and Sony issue, They just host and deliver. That is all, everything else is on ZOS.
PC players seem to think their world will end by consoles being looked after better, Almost like a child being told his parents are having another kid...AAAhhhhh My toys will be neglected.
Most of your patches come 2 weeks after the PC patch. That's 1 week for testing on PC and 1 week for certification (they don't want to have to be fixing two patches simultaneously). That seems pretty reasonable to me.
If some patches take longer than that, it's probably because they need to get more testing in on the PC side (see the Battlegrounds patch right now). Sure, in an ideal world they would have a large team for each platform, but that isn't feasible.
Again this is only dlc release and not what we are talking about bug fixes that you get in a day or a week we wait months for. For what zos called a incremental patch witch they bundle a bunch of pc patchest together to save money on cert please understand that
Only major dlc drops like thieves guild morrowind stuff like that do we get 2 weeks after you nothing else
Show me a build for a gaming PC that can run games at 4k with 60 FPS for 700-800$ to get a PC to do that it's at least a grand.Most of those are on the High end gaming scale of PC.MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »SwaminoNowlino wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »
Xbox one x will as good as most high end pcs if not better it will render true 4k gaming and 60 fps or better depending how dev choose to use the extra power all you need to do is look at the specs buddy
Don't feed the "PC Master" trolls. And especially don't feed them with advertised specs for the One X. I've always played on console, but I am by no means a fan boy for one platform over the other. Honestly, if the One X delivers 50% of what is actually advertised when its actually in use I will be surprised. The PS4 Pro was supposed to revolutionize gaming, and it never lived up to the performance metrics advertised. The One X is highly unlikely to outperform the PS4 in any appreciable way. I'd love for it to, but to get similar performance on a PC, you would need a graphics card that costs more than the entire console. So they're definitely going cheap on the build somewhere (I see red rings of death in the future). But that's all just speculation. And not the point of this thread anyways.
TLDR: Console players are well aware of the console certification process. The console certification process excuse doesn't even fit, since Gina told us they weren't submitting it ASAP, but sticking it in a scheduled incremental instead. All us console players want is to get emergency patches for completely broken content in a timely fashion. If it costs ZOS money, then oh well. That's what they get for releasing busted content despite being warned.
Lol it already has they showed it off it it's up to dev to use the extra power but it's deff there
XB1X specs are on par with a mid-level gaming PC (GPU is usually the equivalent of an X60 Nvidia card). Consoles always release as mid-end gaming PCs. The XB1X is no different (most games will still be running at 30 fps). The cost to create an actual "high end" console would be enormous. Console manufacturers use cheap hardware and then game devs optimize games to squeeze out every last drop of performance from the hardware.
Ide love to see the mid teir pc that can hit 4k 60 fps on games like battle field for 500 bucks I'll get that instead lol
You're not going to be able to build a mid-end gaming PC for $500, but definitely for ~$700-800. There is no denying that consoles give more bang for your buck (because console manufacturer's use custom hardware that has had certain features shaved off, plus they buy hardware in bulk). But giving more bang for your buck =/= competing with gaming PCs.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Console patches are delayed a few weeks for almost every multiplat game. Not sure why this is troubling you now. It's part of the territory of owning a console. Sony and MS make a mess out of patching.
Not sure how you arrived at this conclusion.
Official MS protocol is to queue a patch for verification for a week or so....
Patch released on PC instantly.
Patch on console can be sent to MS at this time for verification, So it should be week but nothing...
Zos confirm will be mid July for a fix that is know not to work on PC as of yesterday but still proceeds....
Arrives on console months later, as experienced by all on these platforms...will not work anyway, actual fix will be deployed later on, no ETA on an actual fix.
How do you arrive at "Sony and MS make a mess out of patching"? Serious question.
Again other developers have delivered patches in the promised time (that actually work) in far shorter time frames than ZOS.
And again....No console patch has ever ever ever arrived within "A few weeks" All Patches to date have come 2 months down the line at best, at present we never got an actual fix post homestead of any use to fix EG Maw being broken, it got ignored again and again until over 100 days later Morrowind dropped and low and behold it's still shite.
Failing to see how this is a MS and Sony issue, They just host and deliver. That is all, everything else is on ZOS.
PC players seem to think their world will end by consoles being looked after better, Almost like a child being told his parents are having another kid...AAAhhhhh My toys will be neglected.
Most of your patches come 2 weeks after the PC patch. That's 1 week for testing on PC and 1 week for certification (they don't want to have to be fixing two patches simultaneously). That seems pretty reasonable to me.
If some patches take longer than that, it's probably because they need to get more testing in on the PC side (see the Battlegrounds patch right now). Sure, in an ideal world they would have a large team for each platform, but that isn't feasible.
Again this is only dlc release and not what we are talking about bug fixes that you get in a day or a week we wait months for. For what zos called a incremental patch witch they bundle a bunch of pc patchest together to save money on cert please understand that
Only major dlc drops like thieves guild morrowind stuff like that do we get 2 weeks after you nothing else
Gotchya. I thought it was everything.
In that case, major bug fixes should definitely be rolled out sooner.
Deleted older posts.
Show me a build for a gaming PC that can run games at 4k with 60 FPS for 700-800$ to get a PC to do that it's at least a grand.Most of those are on the High end gaming scale of PC.MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »SwaminoNowlino wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »
Xbox one x will as good as most high end pcs if not better it will render true 4k gaming and 60 fps or better depending how dev choose to use the extra power all you need to do is look at the specs buddy
Don't feed the "PC Master" trolls. And especially don't feed them with advertised specs for the One X. I've always played on console, but I am by no means a fan boy for one platform over the other. Honestly, if the One X delivers 50% of what is actually advertised when its actually in use I will be surprised. The PS4 Pro was supposed to revolutionize gaming, and it never lived up to the performance metrics advertised. The One X is highly unlikely to outperform the PS4 in any appreciable way. I'd love for it to, but to get similar performance on a PC, you would need a graphics card that costs more than the entire console. So they're definitely going cheap on the build somewhere (I see red rings of death in the future). But that's all just speculation. And not the point of this thread anyways.
TLDR: Console players are well aware of the console certification process. The console certification process excuse doesn't even fit, since Gina told us they weren't submitting it ASAP, but sticking it in a scheduled incremental instead. All us console players want is to get emergency patches for completely broken content in a timely fashion. If it costs ZOS money, then oh well. That's what they get for releasing busted content despite being warned.
Lol it already has they showed it off it it's up to dev to use the extra power but it's deff there
XB1X specs are on par with a mid-level gaming PC (GPU is usually the equivalent of an X60 Nvidia card). Consoles always release as mid-end gaming PCs. The XB1X is no different (most games will still be running at 30 fps). The cost to create an actual "high end" console would be enormous. Console manufacturers use cheap hardware and then game devs optimize games to squeeze out every last drop of performance from the hardware.
Ide love to see the mid teir pc that can hit 4k 60 fps on games like battle field for 500 bucks I'll get that instead lol
You're not going to be able to build a mid-end gaming PC for $500, but definitely for ~$700-800. There is no denying that consoles give more bang for your buck (because console manufacturer's use custom hardware that has had certain features shaved off, plus they buy hardware in bulk). But giving more bang for your buck =/= competing with gaming PCs.
@SwaminoNowlino
Only your post is invalidated. Because you see that the PC players might get the patch sooner than the console people would but then that violates the terms of service of the Xbox uploaders. So when the code doesn't match, the code doesn't match. The main problems is that ZoS doesn't get the patches ready to Microsoft until the PC beta testers have tried it on the PTS. Therefore the end users of that content are null and void. The only way to speed up the patch process is to put a banana in your Xbox until the money pops out.
Why didn't you think of that?
#getTrolledScrub #grammar #getRekt #noETA #otherEsoMemes
DRXHarbinger wrote: »If console players want zos to take note then just all cancel subs and stop buying *** in the clown store.
The morrowinf patch is a joke anyway. Yes they fixed some balance and did a great job on the cp system but the made everything worse by removing cp from bg and pvp campaigns. Now we got 1 campaign left and que times are even more ridiculous.
Your not even listening too us ZOS it has been made clear so many times that proc sets and poisons are broken in pvp and 80% or more of all pvpers dont want them! Now what do you do? You created a patch that completely revived the poison proc meta that you halfa** tryed to fix the last patch.
On Top of that you made us pay extra for morrowind and sht aint working! Even pve! It is so laggy in morrowind that you are getting a headache after playing for just a bit.
hamburgerler76 wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno how much do we need to speak up to get you to say anything?? This is page after page of console players fed up with how this game is managed in console and comment after comment of pc players putting us down cuss of how we play step in say anything say you will look into it say f off we hate you and just want your money just say anything 6k views how much do we need?!?!?
DRXHarbinger wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno how much do we need to speak up to get you to say anything?? This is page after page of console players fed up with how this game is managed in console and comment after comment of pc players putting us down cuss of how we play step in say anything say you will look into it say f off we hate you and just want your money just say anything 6k views how much do we need?!?!?
They don't read these reads or answer them. Look at the old vmol thread near 300k views and they ignored the last 1.5 months of it.
leepalmer95 wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno how much do we need to speak up to get you to say anything?? This is page after page of console players fed up with how this game is managed in console and comment after comment of pc players putting us down cuss of how we play step in say anything say you will look into it say f off we hate you and just want your money just say anything 6k views how much do we need?!?!?
They don't read these reads or answer them. Look at the old vmol thread near 300k views and they ignored the last 1.5 months of it.
It took them 2 years to reduce aoe caps.
Remember the aoe caps thread? Thousands of responses to the poll with thousands of comments.
DRXHarbinger wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno how much do we need to speak up to get you to say anything?? This is page after page of console players fed up with how this game is managed in console and comment after comment of pc players putting us down cuss of how we play step in say anything say you will look into it say f off we hate you and just want your money just say anything 6k views how much do we need?!?!?
They don't read these reads or answer them. Look at the old vmol thread near 300k views and they ignored the last 1.5 months of it.
It took them 2 years to reduce aoe caps.
Remember the aoe caps thread? Thousands of responses to the poll with thousands of comments.
Lol yeah. And in fact it made proxy a joke now. I got hit the other day for 22k with a proxy det. Definitely made breaching a little harder and longer. Who knows in 2 years time we may have the damage limitation on the 7th enemy onwards being removed...
GrumpyMuffin wrote: »DRXHarbinger wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno how much do we need to speak up to get you to say anything?? This is page after page of console players fed up with how this game is managed in console and comment after comment of pc players putting us down cuss of how we play step in say anything say you will look into it say f off we hate you and just want your money just say anything 6k views how much do we need?!?!?
They don't read these reads or answer them. Look at the old vmol thread near 300k views and they ignored the last 1.5 months of it.
Just remember how much they value your custom when they sell new DLC/Crates etc and stay well clear. You can't be bothered to fix what we have already paid for, so why should I give you more money for even more broken stuff. Once the accountants get upset they will finally stop ignoring paying customers
hamburgerler76 wrote: »Show me a build for a gaming PC that can run games at 4k with 60 FPS for 700-800$ to get a PC to do that it's at least a grand.Most of those are on the High end gaming scale of PC.MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »SwaminoNowlino wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »
Xbox one x will as good as most high end pcs if not better it will render true 4k gaming and 60 fps or better depending how dev choose to use the extra power all you need to do is look at the specs buddy
Don't feed the "PC Master" trolls. And especially don't feed them with advertised specs for the One X. I've always played on console, but I am by no means a fan boy for one platform over the other. Honestly, if the One X delivers 50% of what is actually advertised when its actually in use I will be surprised. The PS4 Pro was supposed to revolutionize gaming, and it never lived up to the performance metrics advertised. The One X is highly unlikely to outperform the PS4 in any appreciable way. I'd love for it to, but to get similar performance on a PC, you would need a graphics card that costs more than the entire console. So they're definitely going cheap on the build somewhere (I see red rings of death in the future). But that's all just speculation. And not the point of this thread anyways.
TLDR: Console players are well aware of the console certification process. The console certification process excuse doesn't even fit, since Gina told us they weren't submitting it ASAP, but sticking it in a scheduled incremental instead. All us console players want is to get emergency patches for completely broken content in a timely fashion. If it costs ZOS money, then oh well. That's what they get for releasing busted content despite being warned.
Lol it already has they showed it off it it's up to dev to use the extra power but it's deff there
XB1X specs are on par with a mid-level gaming PC (GPU is usually the equivalent of an X60 Nvidia card). Consoles always release as mid-end gaming PCs. The XB1X is no different (most games will still be running at 30 fps). The cost to create an actual "high end" console would be enormous. Console manufacturers use cheap hardware and then game devs optimize games to squeeze out every last drop of performance from the hardware.
Ide love to see the mid teir pc that can hit 4k 60 fps on games like battle field for 500 bucks I'll get that instead lol
You're not going to be able to build a mid-end gaming PC for $500, but definitely for ~$700-800. There is no denying that consoles give more bang for your buck (because console manufacturer's use custom hardware that has had certain features shaved off, plus they buy hardware in bulk). But giving more bang for your buck =/= competing with gaming PCs.
Yea I mean the console specs speak for itself I mean it's deff a beast of a machine compared to the majority of gaming pcs atleast that's how I feel and it alreay@SwaminoNowlino
Only your post is invalidated. Because you see that the PC players might get the patch sooner than the console people would but then that violates the terms of service of the Xbox uploaders. So when the code doesn't match, the code doesn't match. The main problems is that ZoS doesn't get the patches ready to Microsoft until the PC beta testers have tried it on the PTS. Therefore the end users of that content are null and void. The only way to speed up the patch process is to put a banana in your Xbox until the money pops out.
Why didn't you think of that?
#getTrolledScrub #grammar #getRekt #noETA #otherEsoMemes
Your 100% wrong good try though please troll some where else or atleast read the thread you have no idea what your talking about
hamburgerler76 wrote: »Show me a build for a gaming PC that can run games at 4k with 60 FPS for 700-800$ to get a PC to do that it's at least a grand.Most of those are on the High end gaming scale of PC.MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »SwaminoNowlino wrote: »hamburgerler76 wrote: »
Xbox one x will as good as most high end pcs if not better it will render true 4k gaming and 60 fps or better depending how dev choose to use the extra power all you need to do is look at the specs buddy
Don't feed the "PC Master" trolls. And especially don't feed them with advertised specs for the One X. I've always played on console, but I am by no means a fan boy for one platform over the other. Honestly, if the One X delivers 50% of what is actually advertised when its actually in use I will be surprised. The PS4 Pro was supposed to revolutionize gaming, and it never lived up to the performance metrics advertised. The One X is highly unlikely to outperform the PS4 in any appreciable way. I'd love for it to, but to get similar performance on a PC, you would need a graphics card that costs more than the entire console. So they're definitely going cheap on the build somewhere (I see red rings of death in the future). But that's all just speculation. And not the point of this thread anyways.
TLDR: Console players are well aware of the console certification process. The console certification process excuse doesn't even fit, since Gina told us they weren't submitting it ASAP, but sticking it in a scheduled incremental instead. All us console players want is to get emergency patches for completely broken content in a timely fashion. If it costs ZOS money, then oh well. That's what they get for releasing busted content despite being warned.
Lol it already has they showed it off it it's up to dev to use the extra power but it's deff there
XB1X specs are on par with a mid-level gaming PC (GPU is usually the equivalent of an X60 Nvidia card). Consoles always release as mid-end gaming PCs. The XB1X is no different (most games will still be running at 30 fps). The cost to create an actual "high end" console would be enormous. Console manufacturers use cheap hardware and then game devs optimize games to squeeze out every last drop of performance from the hardware.
Ide love to see the mid teir pc that can hit 4k 60 fps on games like battle field for 500 bucks I'll get that instead lol
You're not going to be able to build a mid-end gaming PC for $500, but definitely for ~$700-800. There is no denying that consoles give more bang for your buck (because console manufacturer's use custom hardware that has had certain features shaved off, plus they buy hardware in bulk). But giving more bang for your buck =/= competing with gaming PCs.
Yea I mean the console specs speak for itself I mean it's deff a beast of a machine compared to the majority of gaming pcs atleast that's how I feel and it alreay@SwaminoNowlino
Only your post is invalidated. Because you see that the PC players might get the patch sooner than the console people would but then that violates the terms of service of the Xbox uploaders. So when the code doesn't match, the code doesn't match. The main problems is that ZoS doesn't get the patches ready to Microsoft until the PC beta testers have tried it on the PTS. Therefore the end users of that content are null and void. The only way to speed up the patch process is to put a banana in your Xbox until the money pops out.
Why didn't you think of that?
#getTrolledScrub #grammar #getRekt #noETA #otherEsoMemes
Your 100% wrong good try though please troll some where else or atleast read the thread you have no idea what your talking about
Lol @ the fact that I can just construct sentences upon sentences of nonsensical words and someone actually attempted to decipher it.