theweakminded wrote: »Pointlessly loaded question is pointless. Punish people for just doing business. No. Fastest way to kill your game.
wrlifeboil wrote: »MercyKilling wrote: »WilliamTee wrote: »With a poll like that you should run referendums on the behalf of a-country-that-shall-not-be-named.
hint: it rhymes with
I have no idea who that is.
So...Finland? Poland. Yugoslavia. Nigeria. Iceland? Australia.
Am I getting warm?
Are you in the senior citizen cohort or the foreign country cohort?
stefaan.de.wasch1b16_ESO wrote: »Dear OP...
You're poll shows a bias and predetermined notion of "OFCOURSE" Hence this poll is merely and ego stroker...
3 option of YES and 1 saying "NO, they get away with it" shows you are biased and are so sure people that buy mats "know" they are doing wrong.
Having more then 1 option of "No" would have been a good start.
Three strike rule again IMO.
1. Take all offending items/gold warn player.
2. Week ban.
3. Perma-ban.
Remember that while you may not be happy with some of the people doing this as they're feeding the gold selling trade they're still legitimate players who want to be playing this game and not all of them are aware of how bad their actions are.
No, if they are using in game gold which they collected legally then they should be allowed to purchase items being sold by any other player period. Stop the one breaking the rules which isnt the buyer IMO.
BenjaminKacher_ESO wrote: »No, if they are using in game gold which they collected legally then they should be allowed to purchase items being sold by any other player period. Stop the one breaking the rules which isnt the buyer IMO.
So if we translate this to a real world example, would you say "Arrest the people selling drugs not the ones buying and using them since the people buying them most likely got their money legally"?
BenjaminKacher_ESO wrote: »No, if they are using in game gold which they collected legally then they should be allowed to purchase items being sold by any other player period. Stop the one breaking the rules which isnt the buyer IMO.
So if we translate this to a real world example, would you say "Arrest the people selling drugs not the ones buying and using them since the people buying them most likely got their money legally"?
Employing virtual worlds to launder money is not a new idea, but whether it's currently being used to hide proceeds of crime on any significant scale is still a subject of debate. But it's not just AUSTRAC that has been keeping an eye on the potential for money laundering; the Financial Action Task Force, the global body that monitors money laundering, issued a report in October 2010, Money Laundering Using New Payment Methods, that noted these digital methods were emerging avenues for hiding illicit profits.
WilliamTee wrote: »With a poll like that you should run referendums on the behalf of a-country-that-shall-not-be-named.
hint: it rhymes with