NettleCarrier wrote: »I did writs as usual on all characters for about a week and then ran out of steam, the event is just too long. I heard horror stories of how long the style pages were taking to drop from world bosses and such and knowing my luck with leads I just decided to sit those out...
Hi All, just wanted to take the time and thank everyone who provided constructive feedback and anecdotal feedback. The team is aware of many of the good points and pain points mentioned in this thread already, but we'll make sure they have this thread as well as the poll and commentary is good to review as we look to improve the event for next year.
@ZOS_Kevin If people are "aware of many of the [...] pain points", then perhaps they can demonstrate that awareness with an apology. To tell your paying customers that you are "aware" of things that went wrong without at the very least offering an apology is quite disrespectful, wouldn't you agree?
"We're sorry that we unexpectedly cut short the compensatory extension of that event, thereby short-changing everyone on PC/NA of a fragment and daily tickets." would be a good starting point.
You know, I was one of the people affected by the lockout, and I emerged from it to reminders of all the things that I missed: inventory that was not encumbered by boxes, enlightenment that had built up to nearly full, a noticeably emptier mailbox, the empty spot that I had reserved in my house for the 2024 replica cake that I didn't get a chance to buy before the lockout, and the thing that topped it all off was that I emerged from the lockout realizing that there was nothing to do, because the event was already over. As such, the end of the lockout felt depressing rather than joyous.
Look, I've written software for long enough to understand that catastrophic mistakes can and do happen, so I'm sympathetic and I'm not holding that against you. And, yes, sometimes fixing something turns out to be more complicated and more time-consuming than expected, so I can understand and accept that too. What I cannot understand is how it was handled. Schedule gets repeatedly delayed and pushed back? Don't just tell us that it's delayed, but tell us why. Restoration took so long that it went past the end of the event? Then give us an extension so that we can still interact with the event, or at least have the decency to tell us why you are unable to extend such a basic courtesy.
You can have someone stand on a stage and talk all day about how it's the players who matter and how much you appreciate us, but those are just words; actions speak louder, and the actions that were and weren't taken were deafening.
Finally, on the topic of reviewing commentary, need I remind you that during the previous PTS cycle, people already called into question the problem of the style pages being both rare and untradable. This feedback was clearly not heeded, since the event went live with no adjustments from PTS. So, again, actions speak louder than words. Telling us that you will "improve the event" in the future means very little when those words are drowned out by the actions (or lack thereof) that were taken.
Incredibly based take.FluffyBird wrote: »Hi All, just wanted to take the time and thank everyone who provided constructive feedback and anecdotal feedback. The team is aware of many of the good points and pain points mentioned in this thread already, but we'll make sure they have this thread as well as the poll and commentary is good to review as we look to improve the event for next year.
"The team" decided in the first place that:
- drop rates are ok
- herding players for gring to a handful of locations and activities is ok
- making the big prize unobtainable without spending tickets is ok
- robbing players of the last hours of event is ok, instead of extending the event
This is also the team that has issues every event, that releases bugged half-baked content, that provided ZERO communication on horrendous drop rate until the event was over.
I'm not holding the glorious PTS mess up against them, but now I don't trust these people to [snip], let alone "improve" anything. You may also pass along heartfelt thanks to Matt Firor for making sure that any promise "to do better" is worth nothing now.
And last, but not least, this was THE ten year anniversary event. It happens ONCE. I don't know how any dev [snip] could treat issues with such an important celebration with "oh well, we'll 'look to improve' next year".
[edited for bashing]
FluffyBird wrote: »
And last, but not least, this was THE ten year anniversary event. It happens ONCE. I don't know how any dev [snip] could treat issues with such an important celebration with "oh well, we'll 'look to improve' next year".
The bolded part was what really disappointed me. To me this did not feel like a 10 year anniversary event. This event felt rushed from a planning perspective. Like the people involved in planning it had less than an hour to think and implement it before some internal deadline.
In the end I think I wanted something more special than a grind, and a horse that feels like a meme.
Edit: But it doesn’t matter anymore. Next year is whatever, the tenth anniversary came and went with a thud and until a twentieth rolls around that is the tone for the next ten years.
You only get one shot for a tenth anniversary.
Caius Drusus Imperial DK (DC) Bragg Ironhand Orc Temp (DC) Neesha Stalks-Shadows Argonian NB (EP) Falidir Altmer Sorcr (AD) J'zharka Khajiit NB (AD) |
Isabeau Runeseer Breton Sorc (DC) Fevassa Dunmer DK (EP) Manut Redguard Temp (AD) Tylera the Summoner Altmer Sorc (EP) Svari Snake-Blood Nord DK (AD) |
Ashlyn D'Elyse Breton NB (EP) Filindria Bosmer Temp (DC) Vigbjorn the Wanderer Nord Warden (EP) Hrokki Winterborn Breton Warden (DC) Basks-in-the-Sunshine Argonian Temp |
Blood_again wrote: »I'm sorry to see how the topic of personal experience and impressions is turning into demanding feedback and pretending to be a majority among us.
DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
Still, only 43% did not like it...
DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
You are correct.
Still, only 43% did not like it. not bad really considering how much complaining about pretty much anything occurs in these forums and the forums are skewed due to the reality we are a vocal minority.
DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
You are correct.
Still, only 43% did not like it. not bad really considering how much complaining about pretty much anything occurs in these forums and the forums are skewed due to the reality we are a vocal minority.
shadyjane62 wrote: »The number of useless gold style pages was terrible. By the third day you couldn't give them away.
old_scopie1945 wrote: »Just glad it is over. It was just a soul destroying grindfest.
old_scopie1945 wrote: »Just glad it is over. It was just a soul destroying grindfest.
Rest up. Scribing is also being described in a similar way to “a soul destroying grindfest” on the PTS, but slower with expensive price tags.