MasterSpatula wrote: »old_scopie1945 wrote: »Just glad it is over. It was just a soul destroying grindfest.
Rest up. Scribing is also being described in a similar way to “a soul destroying grindfest” on the PTS, but slower with expensive price tags.
Maybe so, but at least the ability won't expire if you don't grind it out in a couple of weeks. Nor will it be entirely RNG based, at least as far as I understand.
Hi All, just wanted to take the time and thank everyone who provided constructive feedback and anecdotal feedback. The team is aware of many of the good points and pain points mentioned in this thread already, but we'll make sure they have this thread as well as the poll and commentary is good to review as we look to improve the event for next year.
shadyjane62 wrote: »The number of useless gold style pages was terrible. By the third day you couldn't give them away.
No, I think that was a nice touch, actually. Sure, for people who have been here every year, getting copies of the previous years' pages would likely seem pointless, but I know that for people who had taken breaks or who are new, it was a welcome chance to catch up.
Yes, there is a grab-bag, but that costs tickets, and people who had missed previous years already have a lot of other things to catch up on with their tickets (e.g., the indriks or 2021 items from the assistant).
I don't mind a minor inconvenience if it means that the event is more inclusive. So this is something that I will give ZOS points for and hope that this is a practice that will continue in the future.
Carcamongus wrote: »DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
You are correct.
Still, only 43% did not like it. not bad really considering how much complaining about pretty much anything occurs in these forums and the forums are skewed due to the reality we are a vocal minority.
Bear in mind many of those who picked the "it's OK" option were critical of the event, even agreeing with the views from those who selected "not OK" or "worst event ever".
I_killed_Vivec wrote: »DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
You are correct.
Still, only 43% did not like it. not bad really considering how much complaining about pretty much anything occurs in these forums and the forums are skewed due to the reality we are a vocal minority.
I wouldn't expect 100% (some people don't even like Christmas!), but it is the Tenth Anniversary. Really the vast majority should have found it enjoyable - and consider it time well spent in Tamriel.
They could have done so much more.
One unique give away gift for logging in in April.
Bring back the separate gold boxes for writs, bosses, dolmen, etc.
Work out someway to bring people into Cyrodiil - maybe to salute those who made the ultimate sacrifice over ten years of war (possibly a bit grim...).
Have an anniversary quest linking together different zones - not just geysers in Summerset or bosses in Vvardenfell, include the base game and all of the DLCs.
It seems that they didn't put any thought into it at all. Just throw in a couple of new cosmetics and a mount. That's just minimal effort. They could have done so much more, they could have made it into an EVENT!
I would have preferred them to put time and money into an in-game event than put on an event in Amsterdam.
Based on the threads in these forums, the vast majority seem to dislike the game. There are complaints about everything, yet somehow, this game is successful in the matters that count. Probably, the forums do not reflect the player base since those of us who are active in the forums have demonstrated that we walk to a different drum beat than most players who rarely or never post here.
So yeah, the polls here are for entertainment only.
"the game is financially successful."
this game is successful in the matters that count.
Shadow-Fighter wrote: »I think most didn't realized it was the 10th special Anniversary! 2014-2024.
If it was a normal Jubilee, it was great, *popcorn*.
Yep. I've seen games made with an intention to make a game, not money (*cough* BG3 *cough*) and they are a stark contrast to ESO in fun and quality. But if someone likes having their mouth full of mediocre meal, well, maybe they just prefer bland taste and ESO has their niche. Yay!DemonicGoat wrote: »
Carcamongus wrote: »DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
You are correct.
Still, only 43% did not like it. not bad really considering how much complaining about pretty much anything occurs in these forums and the forums are skewed due to the reality we are a vocal minority.
Bear in mind many of those who picked the "it's OK" option were critical of the event, even agreeing with the views from those who selected "not OK" or "worst event ever".
Few, if any, would be completely happy with the event or any event. Of course most who liked the event or thought it was ok would have liked to see some aspect designed differently. Heck, the forums are filled with complaints from someone about pretty much every aspect of this game, yet the game is financially successful.
That is life and should be expected. It does not detract from those players saying they felt the event was ok.
DemonicGoat wrote: »
Necrotech_Master wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
You are correct.
Still, only 43% did not like it. not bad really considering how much complaining about pretty much anything occurs in these forums and the forums are skewed due to the reality we are a vocal minority.
Bear in mind many of those who picked the "it's OK" option were critical of the event, even agreeing with the views from those who selected "not OK" or "worst event ever".
Few, if any, would be completely happy with the event or any event. Of course most who liked the event or thought it was ok would have liked to see some aspect designed differently. Heck, the forums are filled with complaints from someone about pretty much every aspect of this game, yet the game is financially successful.
That is life and should be expected. It does not detract from those players saying they felt the event was ok.
i think its pretty obvious that the critical spots most people were mentioning was the style page drops, the grind for those with no other optional ways to obtain them is what killed the fun in the event for most people
and them basically requiring spending tickets to get achievements was not a good precedent either
Necrotech_Master wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »DemonicGoat wrote: »
Check your math?
I see "It was not OK. I found only a small part acceptable." 26% AND "The worst event ever. I hate everything in it."
19%"
Thats 45% that think it was not ok..
37% alone think it was only OK and "Some parts were unpleasant"
Where are you seeing an overwhelming success?
You are correct.
Still, only 43% did not like it. not bad really considering how much complaining about pretty much anything occurs in these forums and the forums are skewed due to the reality we are a vocal minority.
Bear in mind many of those who picked the "it's OK" option were critical of the event, even agreeing with the views from those who selected "not OK" or "worst event ever".
Few, if any, would be completely happy with the event or any event. Of course most who liked the event or thought it was ok would have liked to see some aspect designed differently. Heck, the forums are filled with complaints from someone about pretty much every aspect of this game, yet the game is financially successful.
That is life and should be expected. It does not detract from those players saying they felt the event was ok.
i think its pretty obvious that the critical spots most people were mentioning was the style page drops, the grind for those with no other optional ways to obtain them is what killed the fun in the event for most people
and them basically requiring spending tickets to get achievements was not a good precedent either
So not getting all the style page drops or not liking the means to get them makes the event a failure? Does this drive some player's game?
I am just asking because I do not let events control my game life or life in general. I prefer to play the game rather than get caught up in Shineys. Raiding and PvP are where I am most of the time.
DemonicGoat wrote: »
Games can only make money if they can attract players and get them to spend money. The so-called mediocrity has done a great job of keeping players in the game. I doubt the flash of the cash shop is the main driver in players enjoying themselves in the game so they are doing something right.