AnduinTryggva wrote: »And again:
If a player choses not to participate in an event because s/he is not interested in either the event or the collectibles it's that player's choice.
If a player however wishes to participate in a specific event and the threshold is higher than for that event than you see an issue from that player's perspective? Just because some players do not consider it as an issue for themselves does not negate it being an issue for others. That is not difficult to comprehend.
In the same way that its your choice wether you want the collectibles from PvP badly enough to suffer through the "PvP" you have to do to get your tickets.
The threshold for this event is barely higher than for any of the PvE events. The only thing you need to do is quests in PvP areas, which in most cases will barely involve any actual PvP.
Also no one said that everything in the game has to be achievable for every player without those people willing to put in the work that is needed.AnduinTryggva wrote: »I also don't understand why some are so opposed to the idea the level the threshold? Why? Please explain me why pvp events should be primarily accessible to pvp players only?
Because you are not talking about "leveling the threshold", you are talking about having PvE players going into a PvP zone without having any of the dangers that usually come with going to Cyro or IC. If you want to get rewards from a PvP zone you will have to expect PvP to happen, even if you dont like it.AnduinTryggva wrote: »If so what those same people think if the threshold for pve events would be equally raised for pvp players?
I think that most of the content in the game, especially overland and questing should be made considerably harder.
Because in my opinion one of the main reason that PvE players have such a hard time in PvP content is that you dont have to learn anything about how you properly play the game while doing overland and questing.
You can complete almost anything aside from a few bosses in that content without ever wearing gear sets or even the need for more than 1 or 2 skills.
Honestly if it means removing people who are taking up spots in pvp who are miserable and don't want to be there, I don't really care if they had a PvE type zone. The idea as presented doesn't work, as people already explained. It's not really any impact to me in pvp if PvE players go somewhere else. Some people do try pvp because of the events and find out they like it, though.
Some people don't like the comparison being made for PvE stuff. As someone who finds PvE group stuff to be more toxic and ugh than I've experienced pvp to be, I suggest maybe some people be more open minded about suggestions for getting PvE things for people who hate that group content IF they're going to suggest things like this.
AnduinTryggva wrote: »Honestly if it means removing people who are taking up spots in pvp who are miserable and don't want to be there, I don't really care if they had a PvE type zone. The idea as presented doesn't work, as people already explained. It's not really any impact to me in pvp if PvE players go somewhere else. Some people do try pvp because of the events and find out they like it, though.
Some people don't like the comparison being made for PvE stuff. As someone who finds PvE group stuff to be more toxic and ugh than I've experienced pvp to be, I suggest maybe some people be more open minded about suggestions for getting PvE things for people who hate that group content IF they're going to suggest things like this.
To be honest I really don't understand why some forists heated up so badly. It's a suggestion, maybe one that is not feasible or has drawbacks that render it less interesting. I can handle if people point this out and I can accept if a suggestion stales.
What I think is terrible behavior is to get inflamatory replies by some who don't like it. If you don't like it it is your right and you can express this ideally supported by some good reasons. I am fine with it as long as it stays with the minimum of respect.
I am really astonished about so much lack of basic respect to fellow players out of nowhere by some just because of a suggestion which is not even a request. Simply a suggestion.
AnduinTryggva wrote: »Honestly if it means removing people who are taking up spots in pvp who are miserable and don't want to be there, I don't really care if they had a PvE type zone. The idea as presented doesn't work, as people already explained. It's not really any impact to me in pvp if PvE players go somewhere else. Some people do try pvp because of the events and find out they like it, though.
Some people don't like the comparison being made for PvE stuff. As someone who finds PvE group stuff to be more toxic and ugh than I've experienced pvp to be, I suggest maybe some people be more open minded about suggestions for getting PvE things for people who hate that group content IF they're going to suggest things like this.
To be honest I really don't understand why some forists heated up so badly. It's a suggestion, maybe one that is not feasible or has drawbacks that render it less interesting. I can handle if people point this out and I can accept if a suggestion stales.
What I think is terrible behavior is to get inflamatory replies by some who don't like it. If you don't like it it is your right and you can express this ideally supported by some good reasons. I am fine with it as long as it stays with the minimum of respect.
I am really astonished about so much lack of basic respect to fellow players out of nowhere by some just because of a suggestion which is not even a request. Simply a suggestion.
Its funny that you demand respect when you have been disrespecting the games PvP community in basically this entire thread.