The part when the bridge collapses and a bunch of players plummet to their deaths is glorious. It was a clear improvement to the previously sometimes stale bridge fights.
I disagree, there's usually some passive aggressive sieging for a while afterwards. It also serves as a useful toilet break for everyone before it's repaired.
Greasytengu wrote: »The bridge wars live on!!
Ad is not cowardly/smart enough to collapse their bridge intentionally so many a good low stakes war is still had there even today. Unlike certain other factions who collapse their barrier the second Roe is taken Iwonderwhothatcouldbe?
I disagree, there's usually some passive aggressive sieging for a while afterwards. It also serves as a useful toilet break for everyone before it's repaired.
"Passive aggressive sieging and toilet breaks" are not PVP.
Greasytengu wrote: »The bridge wars live on!!
Ad is not cowardly/smart enough to collapse their bridge intentionally so many a good low stakes war is still had there even today. Unlike certain other factions who collapse their barrier the second Roe is taken Iwonderwhothatcouldbe?
On PS4 they do, ironically the same people that destroy the bridge are the same ones crying in chat that ep is hitting our home keeps. Like duh what did they think would happen when they destroy the bridge.
The part when the bridge collapses and a bunch of players plummet to their deaths is glorious. It was a clear improvement to the previously sometimes stale bridge fights.
As a DC player I'm wondering, what's a bridge war?
/s
I imagine so, but whenever I log on we're either getting pushed back, already own Alessia and Blue Road Keep, or are assaulting Roebeck/Chalman. So rare to get into a bridge fight nowadays.
As a DC player I'm wondering, what's a bridge war?
/s