Out of curiosity. Are all these folks getting invited PC players, or are there some who main consoles as well?
I would wager that to be a truly objective approach, it would need to include members from both areas. Console play is inherently different from PC play, even if the base game is identical. To not include console feedback during this type of discussion is doing a huge disservice to the community that plays on console.
Out of curiosity. Are all these folks getting invited PC players, or are there some who main consoles as well?
I would wager that to be a truly objective approach, it would need to include members from both areas. Console play is inherently different from PC play, even if the base game is identical. To not include console feedback during this type of discussion is doing a huge disservice to the community that plays on console.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Out of curiosity. Are all these folks getting invited PC players, or are there some who main consoles as well?
I would wager that to be a truly objective approach, it would need to include members from both areas. Console play is inherently different from PC play, even if the base game is identical. To not include console feedback during this type of discussion is doing a huge disservice to the community that plays on console.
As mentioned in the original post, there are players from both PC and console platforms.
Joy_Division wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hey everyone, just want to reiterate not everyone attending is a streamer - we've chosen a wide variety of players with different strengths based on our needs. This is also not the same thing as the class rep program we recently announced; this effort has a completely different focus. Lastly, remember not everyone attending has chimed in this thread - and they don't have to if they're not comfortable doing so.
I know you folks at ZoS take a lot of heat for the perception of inviting folks that some people do not feel are representative of the community. People may disagree with me, but I think going all the way back to Summer 2014 with the guild Summit, the representation, while not perfect, has been diverse.
Then I look forward to reading the reports from people about they representations they made to ZOS about rebuilding the in-game crafting economy, as well as all the measures to support RP play... in addition to ZOS's positive responses to these representations.
If that actually happened then it would just about make my day.
Interesting that you should mention diversity and the 2014 summit. My memory suggested that the English guilds mentioned were predominantly competitive PvE and PvP guilds. So I checked, Gina's post lists 11 English guilds. I'd probably pitch about 7 of those 11 as being specifically PvP or PvE centric guilds (rather than social/casual, crafting or RP). What would your estimate be? How many of that number identified themselves as RP-heavy guilds? I'd be interested in your insight.
I roleplay as an Argonian Handbag-in-Training, does that count?
That is good to know.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Out of curiosity. Are all these folks getting invited PC players, or are there some who main consoles as well?
I would wager that to be a truly objective approach, it would need to include members from both areas. Console play is inherently different from PC play, even if the base game is identical. To not include console feedback during this type of discussion is doing a huge disservice to the community that plays on console.
As mentioned in the original post, there are players from both PC and console platforms.
Joy_Division wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hey everyone, just want to reiterate not everyone attending is a streamer - we've chosen a wide variety of players with different strengths based on our needs. This is also not the same thing as the class rep program we recently announced; this effort has a completely different focus. Lastly, remember not everyone attending has chimed in this thread - and they don't have to if they're not comfortable doing so.
I know you folks at ZoS take a lot of heat for the perception of inviting folks that some people do not feel are representative of the community. People may disagree with me, but I think going all the way back to Summer 2014 with the guild Summit, the representation, while not perfect, has been diverse.
Then I look forward to reading the reports from people about they representations they made to ZOS about rebuilding the in-game crafting economy, as well as all the measures to support RP play... in addition to ZOS's positive responses to these representations.
If that actually happened then it would just about make my day.
Interesting that you should mention diversity and the 2014 summit. My memory suggested that the English guilds mentioned were predominantly competitive PvE and PvP guilds. So I checked, Gina's post lists 11 English guilds. I'd probably pitch about 7 of those 11 as being specifically PvP or PvE centric guilds (rather than social/casual, crafting or RP). What would your estimate be? How many of that number identified themselves as RP-heavy guilds? I'd be interested in your insight.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
@Joy_Division
I hope that PvP GM talks about making rewards of the worthy much more profitable because the 200-300 gold is a joke IMO. I'd love to see it raised to 1k but more so 2k just because of how expensive it is to PvP when you're burning through potions like no other.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
I hope ZOS gets some insightful and productive feedback that improves the game. Thanks to the play testers for accepting the offer and helping to give the rest of us a voice.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »We want to give everyone a heads up that we've invited a small number of players to visit ZeniMax Online this week. These players will be playtesting some of our upcoming content and features with the goal being to get early, targeted feedback and suggestions.
paulsimonps wrote: »Good to see that a lot of new people got invited to it and not just the same people, even if some are returning. Remember that it was a great experience being there last time. Will not be returning personally but good to know some people that had and have had great feedback are going. Have fun and help make the game better guys. Hope we get some great theorycrafters to come with. @Taylor_MB you going? I would have recommended you, done really great stuff for the community and knows the formulas well. Damage mitigation theorycrafters need to represent
Seraphayel wrote: »Oh you already returned back home? How long did you guys stay there? May we ask that?
Seraphayel wrote: »Oh you already returned back home? How long did you guys stay there? May we ask that?
Nah we're here until Saturday.
Shad0wfire99 wrote: »In b4 "everything is the streamers' fault!"
Seraphayel wrote: »Oh you already returned back home? How long did you guys stay there? May we ask that?
Thank you very much for the invitation and the awesome play-session which was a very nice surprise this time (we hadn't one last year for Morrowind for example). I always love the passion of the developers and CMs, it is so much fun to talk to persons who do their hobby as a job and just love ESO (like us, the players). So catchy!
Unfortunately the orc can't say much more right now, but you'll see his article on the 3rd of April on ESO-Schatzsucher.de in German and English.
#Summerset is coming, be prepared!
Seraphayel wrote: »Oh you already returned back home? How long did you guys stay there? May we ask that?
Chufu was talking about the event in London which took place on Tuesday.