Alright so I'm a Stam tank DK that uses 2H and 1H&shield. I can't really afford to equip another magicka skill and caltrops is expensive as hell. This build is effective against any type of player even NBs. Unless they are cloak spammers. So what your telling me is I need to alter and effectively gimp myself to deal with the select few who are determined to spam cloak to avoid damage where as I don't have to do anything like this for any other class?
Alright so I'm a Stam tank DK that uses 2H and 1H&shield. I can't really afford to equip another magicka skill and caltrops is expensive as hell. This build is effective against any type of player even NBs. Unless they are cloak spammers. So what your telling me is I need to alter and effectively gimp myself to deal with the select few who are determined to spam cloak to avoid damage where as I don't have to do anything like this for any other class?
Alright so I'm a Stam tank DK that uses 2H and 1H&shield. I can't really afford to equip another magicka skill and caltrops is expensive as hell. This build is effective against any type of player even NBs. Unless they are cloak spammers. So what your telling me is I need to alter and effectively gimp myself to deal with the select few who are determined to spam cloak to avoid damage where as I don't have to do anything like this for any other class?
Yes. Build diversity means that every build will not be great against every other build. The fact that you can hold your own against so many builds but have a problem with ONE type means that you are already winning. Do you really want a game where there is a build that can dominate anything? Dynamics. You have a (slight) Achilles Heel. You SHOULD.
If you don't like the options available that absolutely exist to deal with that specific enemy type, then that's your choice. It's a social MMORPG. There are supposed to be varying levels of effectiveness between individual build types. If there weren't, we would have a far bigger problem than you getting annoyed by kiting NBs.
Alright. I guess I can accept this. it's not that I necessarily was in risk of getting killed by him anyways as he had to keep running. But what about dragging those bosses lol.
timidobserver wrote: »I don't really need cloak to be nerfed in it's direct combat effectiveness, but I'd be okay with it not being able to deaggro boss mobs onto enemy players. The mobs should just reset.
Alright so I'm a Stam tank DK that uses 2H and 1H&shield. I can't really afford to equip another magicka skill and caltrops is expensive as hell. This build is effective against any type of player even NBs. Unless they are cloak spammers. So what your telling me is I need to alter and effectively gimp myself to deal with the select few who are determined to spam cloak to avoid damage where as I don't have to do anything like this for any other class?
Many people have resorted to giving up entire set bonuses to be able to deal with the select few players that stack wards. Sacrificing one strength for another is a part of game balance. You will have to sacrifice something to be able to deal with cloak spammers.
Wards don't have many counters, mainly just the shieldbreaker set or ridiculously overbearing amounts of burst damage.
Shadow Cloak is countered by almost every AoE ability, on top of several different abilities that specifically counter stealth, and even a potion. You'll find a way.
A 5 piece set..... that gives awkward bonus like stam regen, max stam, weapon dmg as the first 4 traits... but yeah, you sacrifice 5 slots!
Dont even take serious people who say use aoe in IC. Pots and that flare in alliance war skill line is your best bet. In fact, that flare is really good.
And I agree cloak should get same treatment as bolt escape
Why? Templar lost a shield and aoe blind already.Lava_Croft wrote: »