Arsenic_Touch wrote: »There was a disagree button but they felt it didn't create a welcome environment on the forums. You can thank all of the people that abused the troll and disagree button during the beta forums.
Arsenic_Touch wrote: »There was a disagree button but they felt it didn't create a welcome environment on the forums. You can thank all of the people that abused the troll and disagree button during the beta forums.
Arsenic_Touch wrote: »There was a disagree button but they felt it didn't create a welcome environment on the forums. You can thank all of the people that abused the troll and disagree button during the beta forums.
That reminds me of a school that decided to mark corrections and wrong answers in green because red is too damaging to a student's self esteem.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584672/School-bans-red-ink-tells-teachers-mark-green-instead-pupils-respond-purple.html
And another that uses purple for the same reason.
http://www.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041004/news_1m4pens.html
Arsenic_Touch wrote: »There was a disagree button but they felt it didn't create a welcome environment on the forums. You can thank all of the people that abused the troll and disagree button during the beta forums.
I'm kinda two sided about this. I believe this forum doesn't need one inch of negativity more, but then again I feel like disagree button wouldn't probly make any difference in that sense anymore :PArsenic_Touch wrote: »There was a disagree button but they felt it didn't create a welcome environment on the forums. You can thank all of the people that abused the troll and disagree button during the beta forums.
KhajitFurTrader wrote: »Funny how the same topics creep up independently in the different language forums. So here's a loosely translated version of the answer I gave over there:
Look at it this way: the options available to express agreement in varying degrees are useful to stem in the flood of posts solely consisting of "/agree", "^^this!" etc. Posts expressing nothing but agreement without adding either anything new to the discussion, or new insights, are nice to have, but also dampen the signal/noise ratio.
In the case of disagreement with any posted opinion, it's useful for others to know, and thus to express, why it exists, in the interest of discourse (that's what forums are for, right? Right??). Plus, disagreement to something on the 'net is almost always expressed explicitly anyway (xkcd). The possibility to anonymously downvote or diss posts will almost certainly be abused by some, and a "dislike" doesn't give any new insight on the topic (other than negativity, which isn't helpful in itself).
Also, in my opinion, having a second reddit around here would be quite redundant (or is "superfluous" the better word here?)
vyndral13preub18_ESO wrote: »
I disagree.
How do you abuse a button on the forums that doesn't do anything?
vyndral13preub18_ESO wrote: »
I disagree.
How do you abuse a button on the forums that doesn't do anything?
vyndral13preub18_ESO wrote: »Trolling how?
And do you think the developers were sitting around looking at things going, oh my this has 50 disagrees we better not do this!
KhajitFurTrader wrote: »vyndral13preub18_ESO wrote: »
I disagree.
How do you abuse a button on the forums that doesn't do anything?
I didn't know there'd ever been one around here. So what did it do? Increment the "Disagree" counter of the post by 1? I'd say it did something, then. But it surely didn't say why and by whom.
Honestly, I would be fine with doing away with the whole point scoring thing anyway. Not that I do not appreciate them when I get them, when well meant. Just I think a forum should be for discussions, and rewards come with engaging in such for a greater outcome.
Besides, disagrees, and low marks/score downs, just invite pissing contests, as they encourage trolls and bitterness anyway. As others have pointed out from experience too.