Maverick827 wrote: »You clearly didn't pay attention to my post.Blackhorne wrote: »Maverick827 wrote: »The problem is that ZOS is not addressing anything.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/64066/patch-notes-v1-0-1#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/71736/patch-notes-v1-0-2#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/78407/patch-notes-v1-0-3#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/81292/patch-notes-v1-0-4#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/84259/patch-notes-v1-0-5#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/89332/patch-notes-v1-0-6#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/91966/patch-notes-v1-0-7#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/95370/patch-notes-v1-0-8#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/tracker
http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/category/development
The problem is that you haven't been paying attention
Throwing patch notes out isn't communication, and it doesn't address issues when they need to be addressed: as they are being discussed by the community.
I'm not going to appload ZOS for meeting the bare minimum of minor patch notes every week.
I unsubbed today. Forum posts don't hurt the grey suits, my and your wallet do.
This whole gaming business needs a kick in the butt. To much money being earned by people who've been living off selling unfinished products for way to long.
Funny thing is that most of the fanboys seem to take it for granted. They don't give a crap as long as there's lube around.
alanspurlock_ESO wrote: »I don't feel it is. I love it. But man is there some hate around the net over this.
alanspurlock_ESO wrote: »Wait.... I wonder if this will be like FF14... it was such a flop... they pulled the game of the shelves and then released FF14 A Realm Reborn like... 5 years later lol. Wait, it was like 8 years later.
I don't feel it is. I love it. But man is there some hate around the net over this.
If you think ZOS is "on top of forum posts," then I'm sorry that you're standards are so low. The developers don't even post here.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Maverick827 wrote: »You clearly didn't pay attention to my post.Blackhorne wrote: »Maverick827 wrote: »The problem is that ZOS is not addressing anything.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/64066/patch-notes-v1-0-1#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/71736/patch-notes-v1-0-2#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/78407/patch-notes-v1-0-3#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/81292/patch-notes-v1-0-4#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/84259/patch-notes-v1-0-5#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/89332/patch-notes-v1-0-6#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/91966/patch-notes-v1-0-7#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/95370/patch-notes-v1-0-8#latest
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/tracker
http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/category/development
The problem is that you haven't been paying attention
Throwing patch notes out isn't communication, and it doesn't address issues when they need to be addressed: as they are being discussed by the community.
I'm not going to appload ZOS for meeting the bare minimum of minor patch notes every week.
On top of forum posts, news posts on the main site, AMAs, etc.
Nox_Aeterna wrote: »Well i played bad games mate , this is not a bad game.
This is a good game , nothing great or to write home about , but good.
Lets see what craglorn will do , the so promised patch.
I've cancelled my sub. It's not that I hate this game, or think it's particularly bad, I just don't think it's anywhere near good enough to justify a monthly sub. It's average, it's mundane and it very much is 'just another mmo'. There are already a fair amount of F2P mmorpg's out there of a very similar quality level to ESO.
lavendercat wrote: »im absolutely loving the game. its actually the best game ive ever played, and that includes "elite" on the bbc model B !! :P
obviously everyone has their own reasons for complaining, but i just find it really wierd to read so many bad reviews. some people seem to want the world on a stick. !!
anyway what i really want is to read about other people's (positive) experiences in the game, not why its terrible because there is no armour dye. (lol)
At first when I saw the bad sales my first thought was that someone would pull the plug on the game, same as what happend to TSW. In TSW as far as I know the zone promissed for fall 2012 has not yet been released, that's becaus they have some 20 devs left on all 3 Funcom games.
I'm happy to see Zenimax postponed the x-box/ps version of the game, not so happy about the lie for why(network issue a month before release? common...) When you look at all the people they hire now it seems like Zenimax is still all in and want to try and relaunch the game.
What worries me is the complete lack of imagination in certain areas of the game, and the rather failed execution of some important systems. I always give devs the benefit of the doubt, but when excatly what the players predict happens I'm not impressed.
I'm looking forward to Craglorn but considering I still haven't seen any loot, and so far the VR dungeon loot has been pretty dull, so why should the loot suddenly become much better in Craglorn? We'll see I guess.
alanspurlock_ESO wrote: »Wait.... I wonder if this will be like FF14... it was such a flop... they pulled the game of the shelves and then released FF14 A Realm Reborn like... 5 years later lol. Wait, it was like 8 years later.
pieceofyarnb14_ESO wrote: »This one reminds me of one of my favorites DAoC.
silent88b14_ESO wrote: »Part of the problem I think is that the developers expected folks to want their game to be fun and interesting, but didn't expect or provide sufficiently for those who treat it as either a business environment or a sabotage opportunity. Possibly naive, but more likely regular folks preferring to think well of other people. A genesis of cynicism.
Vendersleigh wrote: »silent88b14_ESO wrote: »Part of the problem I think is that the developers expected folks to want their game to be fun and interesting, but didn't expect or provide sufficiently for those who treat it as either a business environment or a sabotage opportunity. Possibly naive, but more likely regular folks preferring to think well of other people. A genesis of cynicism.
Yes, this is what I think too. Naive but nice is how they come across.
I love the game, finding few intrinsic faults, but the botting and hacking are making me reconsider if I wish to renew when my sub runs out.
Vendersleigh wrote: »silent88b14_ESO wrote: »Part of the problem I think is that the developers expected folks to want their game to be fun and interesting, but didn't expect or provide sufficiently for those who treat it as either a business environment or a sabotage opportunity. Possibly naive, but more likely regular folks preferring to think well of other people. A genesis of cynicism.
Yes, this is what I think too. Naive but nice is how they come across.
I love the game, finding few intrinsic faults, but the botting and hacking are making me reconsider if I wish to renew when my sub runs out.