If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.
We shouldn't be limited in our options just because a small number of people may be annoying. That's what reporting and the TOS is for.
spartaxoxo wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.
We shouldn't be limited in our options just because a small number of people may be annoying. That's what reporting and the TOS is for.
There's a massive difference in scale when it doesn't cost power. At least in my pass experience.
spartaxoxo wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.
We shouldn't be limited in our options just because a small number of people may be annoying. That's what reporting and the TOS is for.
There's a massive difference in scale when it doesn't cost power. At least in my pass experience.
I still don't find this request compelling. If someone is harassing you, report them. That is what it is for.
The few people who really want to harass someone else, like I said, will do so anyway in the current system as is.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.
We shouldn't be limited in our options just because a small number of people may be annoying. That's what reporting and the TOS is for.
There's a massive difference in scale when it doesn't cost power. At least in my pass experience.
I still don't find this request compelling. If someone is harassing you, report them. That is what it is for.
The few people who really want to harass someone else, like I said, will do so anyway in the current system as is.
They won't do so anyway in the current system. It's literally decreased harassment greatly from other games that I have played that work different. I think different types of games drawing in different crowds of people is perfectly normal. When you make it easier for people to harass others, you get more harassment.
I also don't think players are being robbed because they're asked to wear clothing in public spaces.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.
We shouldn't be limited in our options just because a small number of people may be annoying. That's what reporting and the TOS is for.
There's a massive difference in scale when it doesn't cost power. At least in my pass experience.
I still don't find this request compelling. If someone is harassing you, report them. That is what it is for.
The few people who really want to harass someone else, like I said, will do so anyway in the current system as is.
They won't do so anyway in the current system. It's literally decreased harassment greatly from other games that I have played that work different. I think different types of games drawing in different crowds of people is perfectly normal. When you make it easier for people to harass others, you get more harassment.
I also don't think players are being robbed because they're asked to wear clothing in public spaces.
You must really underestimate the personality of people who like to sexually harass others. Havnig to remove their pants by a simple click will not deter them, as had happened in the OP. If someone has that goal, they are not deterred. I don't know how many people you think exist that suddenly would harass that otherwise wouldn't due to options like this.
If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.
Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
allochthons wrote: »But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
So you think people who want to sexually harass think to themselves, "I'd hate to have to click once to remove my pants. I guess I won't harass today."
Or according to Spart - "I wan't going to harass anyone today, but now that I can remove my pants at the costume station rather than remove my armor, I think I will!"
This is just absurd logic to me.
The people who harass have personality problems that go beyond these options, and if they are inclined to do so will and need to be reported.
allochthons wrote: »I totally get why people want to hide legs. I want to show off my skins and body markings, too!
But if you do, please, please, change the default underwear to something less tight and revealing. Even something like the default underwear on male khajiit would be enough.
For example, I was in the IC sewer base on a female character, in a non-revealing, non-sexy outfit. Another character came and stood right on top of me. I moved away, and asked them if they were wanting to group. No answer, and they came and stood on top of me again. I moved away to a place you would NOT randomly moved to, and again they came and stood on top of me. That's when I realized they didn't have any legs equipped.
I don't know why this triggers the same thrill that exposure does, but it sure seems to. Please. Don't allow this.
Yes, I reported the player.
It would be great, if instead of "hiding" legs... they brought out more cosmetic styles that we could use in place of legs, whether that's "underwear" styles, normal skirts/kilts/trousers, etc.
With appropriate styles/cosmetics, there would be no need to hide the legs at all.
[EDIT: Actually, rather than hide "legs" and "chests" in full, I'd much prefer a hide "flaps" and "pads" that we get on the chest pieces... there's some great style combinations ruined by those flaps/pads. In fact, the more I think about it, the more hiding of chest/legs could be achieved simply by ensuring there's a greater selection of styles, including non-armour styles that are not costumes, with options to remove flaps/pads from existing armour styles.]
allochthons wrote: »So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
spartaxoxo wrote: »allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
So you think people who want to sexually harass think to themselves, "I'd hate to have to click once to remove my pants. I guess I won't harass today."
Or according to Spart - "I wan't going to harass anyone today, but now that I can remove my pants at the costume station rather than remove my armor, I think I will!"
This is just absurd logic to me.
The people who harass have personality problems that go beyond these options, and if they are inclined to do so will and need to be reported.
No. It's more like "I'm bored. *Looks at character that's scantily clad 24/7 anyway*. I know what I'll do."
Or
"Ohhh. Finally this game isn't "censored" anymore! That Night Market thing sounds cool too. I think I'll check it out."
Again. I never once argued that it would stop someone who was already dead set on harassing people.
I said it will increase in volume because it makes it easier to do and attracts a crowd that aren't generally interested in games like these.
Your example is absolutely not my point at all. I already acknowledged that form of harassment already exists.
spartaxoxo wrote: »allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
So you think people who want to sexually harass think to themselves, "I'd hate to have to click once to remove my pants. I guess I won't harass today."
Or according to Spart - "I wan't going to harass anyone today, but now that I can remove my pants at the costume station rather than remove my armor, I think I will!"
This is just absurd logic to me.
The people who harass have personality problems that go beyond these options, and if they are inclined to do so will and need to be reported.
No. It's more like "I'm bored. *Looks at character that's scantily clad 24/7 anyway*. I know what I'll do."
Or
"Ohhh. Finally this game isn't "censored" anymore! That Night Market thing sounds cool too. I think I'll check it out."
Again. I never once argued that it would stop someone who was already dead set on harassing people.
I said it will increase in volume because it makes it easier to do and attracts a crowd that aren't generally interested in games like these.
Your example is absolutely not my point at all. I already acknowledged that form of harassment already exists.
So you think a bored person who is into sexual harassment doesn't have the time to take off their pants? This is pretty weak.
And you think this option is going to attract a whole legion of sexual harassers who weren't interested in ESO the past decade?
I'm just going to let your arguments speak for themselves.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
So you think people who want to sexually harass think to themselves, "I'd hate to have to click once to remove my pants. I guess I won't harass today."
Or according to Spart - "I wan't going to harass anyone today, but now that I can remove my pants at the costume station rather than remove my armor, I think I will!"
This is just absurd logic to me.
The people who harass have personality problems that go beyond these options, and if they are inclined to do so will and need to be reported.
No. It's more like "I'm bored. *Looks at character that's scantily clad 24/7 anyway*. I know what I'll do."
Or
"Ohhh. Finally this game isn't "censored" anymore! That Night Market thing sounds cool too. I think I'll check it out."
Again. I never once argued that it would stop someone who was already dead set on harassing people.
I said it will increase in volume because it makes it easier to do and attracts a crowd that aren't generally interested in games like these.
Your example is absolutely not my point at all. I already acknowledged that form of harassment already exists.
So you think a bored person who is into sexual harassment doesn't have the time to take off their pants? This is pretty weak.
And you think this option is going to attract a whole legion of sexual harassers who weren't interested in ESO the past decade?
I'm just going to let your arguments speak for themselves.
I never said a bored person cannot take off their pants, so no.
It would be great, if instead of "hiding" legs... they brought out more cosmetic styles that we could use in place of legs, whether that's "underwear" styles, normal skirts/kilts/trousers, etc. These new styles would simply need to show off the majority of the leg and the various skins/markings that we might be wearing.
With appropriate styles/cosmetics, there would be no need to hide the legs at all.
[EDIT: Actually, rather than hide "legs" and "chests" in full, I'd much prefer a hide "flaps" and "pads" that we get on the chest pieces... there's some great style combinations ruined by those flaps/pads. In fact, the more I think about it, the more hiding of chest/legs could be achieved simply by ensuring there's a greater selection of styles, including non-armour styles that are not costumes, with options to remove flaps/pads from existing armour styles.]
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
So you think people who want to sexually harass think to themselves, "I'd hate to have to click once to remove my pants. I guess I won't harass today."
Or according to Spart - "I wan't going to harass anyone today, but now that I can remove my pants at the costume station rather than remove my armor, I think I will!"
This is just absurd logic to me.
The people who harass have personality problems that go beyond these options, and if they are inclined to do so will and need to be reported.
No. It's more like "I'm bored. *Looks at character that's scantily clad 24/7 anyway*. I know what I'll do."
Or
"Ohhh. Finally this game isn't "censored" anymore! That Night Market thing sounds cool too. I think I'll check it out."
Again. I never once argued that it would stop someone who was already dead set on harassing people.
I said it will increase in volume because it makes it easier to do and attracts a crowd that aren't generally interested in games like these.
Your example is absolutely not my point at all. I already acknowledged that form of harassment already exists.
So you think a bored person who is into sexual harassment doesn't have the time to take off their pants? This is pretty weak.
And you think this option is going to attract a whole legion of sexual harassers who weren't interested in ESO the past decade?
I'm just going to let your arguments speak for themselves.
I never said a bored person cannot take off their pants, so no.
Then how much imagined additional harassment is your argument going to prevent?
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
So you think people who want to sexually harass think to themselves, "I'd hate to have to click once to remove my pants. I guess I won't harass today."
Or according to Spart - "I wan't going to harass anyone today, but now that I can remove my pants at the costume station rather than remove my armor, I think I will!"
This is just absurd logic to me.
The people who harass have personality problems that go beyond these options, and if they are inclined to do so will and need to be reported.
No. It's more like "I'm bored. *Looks at character that's scantily clad 24/7 anyway*. I know what I'll do."
Or
"Ohhh. Finally this game isn't "censored" anymore! That Night Market thing sounds cool too. I think I'll check it out."
Again. I never once argued that it would stop someone who was already dead set on harassing people.
I said it will increase in volume because it makes it easier to do and attracts a crowd that aren't generally interested in games like these.
Your example is absolutely not my point at all. I already acknowledged that form of harassment already exists.
So you think a bored person who is into sexual harassment doesn't have the time to take off their pants? This is pretty weak.
And you think this option is going to attract a whole legion of sexual harassers who weren't interested in ESO the past decade?
I'm just going to let your arguments speak for themselves.
I never said a bored person cannot take off their pants, so no.
Then how much imagined additional harassment is your argument going to prevent?
Again. I am not speaking from imagination but from personal experience. I said games that I have played with a lot of scantily clad women had more harassment than ones that don't. I don't play such games any longer because they're much easier to ignore since there are many more options on the market. And the amount of harassment I have personally experienced since making that decision has greatly decreased.
I said that I am worried the harassment in this game will increase simply because it's now easier to think to do and more attractive to a certain type of player. But I also expressed my hope that wouldn't happen here. And acknowledged that my bad memories from those earlier games are likely biasing my opinion and that it is unlikely that a lot of people would switch to a 10 year old game just because of that change.
A lot of arguments being attributed to me aren't ones that I have made. I don't run around in fear of half naked NPCs. I do not think there will be "legions," of harassers (I actually explicitly stated the opposite from jump). And I don't think that unequipping pants is some kind of magical mind control device that stops someone from harassing.
spartaxoxo wrote: »There's a massive difference in scale when it doesn't cost power. At least in my past experience. Again, I can't speak to others experience.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »allochthons wrote: »If someone wanted to harass you not wearing any clothes they can already do so now, by taking off their armor.Yes, I know. But as @spartaxoxo said, that does take away part of an armor bonus. So you have to do / undo it specifically for harassment purposes.scrappy1342 wrote: »so... what's to stop them from doing just what that person did and just un-equipping them?
But Hide Legs will make it much easier, specifically, to harass. You can just use it by default.
I would have asked that they change the default underwear years ago, but there is a real Puritan feel to that which I really dislike. I'm not overly modest, nor fond of laws regarding it. I'm fine with folks running around with very little clothing.
But this, specifically, will become a problem. And the "solution," reporting the harasser, is again put on the person being harassed.
Harassment isn't an annoyance. It's harassment, and very disturbing. I didn't play for days after that original IC harassment.
So you think people who want to sexually harass think to themselves, "I'd hate to have to click once to remove my pants. I guess I won't harass today."
Or according to Spart - "I wan't going to harass anyone today, but now that I can remove my pants at the costume station rather than remove my armor, I think I will!"
This is just absurd logic to me.
The people who harass have personality problems that go beyond these options, and if they are inclined to do so will and need to be reported.
No. It's more like "I'm bored. *Looks at character that's scantily clad 24/7 anyway*. I know what I'll do."
Or
"Ohhh. Finally this game isn't "censored" anymore! That Night Market thing sounds cool too. I think I'll check it out."
Again. I never once argued that it would stop someone who was already dead set on harassing people.
I said it will increase in volume because it makes it easier to do and attracts a crowd that aren't generally interested in games like these.
Your example is absolutely not my point at all. I already acknowledged that form of harassment already exists.
So you think a bored person who is into sexual harassment doesn't have the time to take off their pants? This is pretty weak.
And you think this option is going to attract a whole legion of sexual harassers who weren't interested in ESO the past decade?
I'm just going to let your arguments speak for themselves.
I never said a bored person cannot take off their pants, so no.
Then how much imagined additional harassment is your argument going to prevent?
Again. I am not speaking from imagination but from personal experience. I said games that I have played with a lot of scantily clad women had more harassment than ones that don't. I don't play such games any longer because they're much easier to ignore since there are many more options on the market. And the amount of harassment I have personally experienced since making that decision has greatly decreased.
I said that I am worried the harassment in this game will increase simply because it's now easier to think to do and more attractive to a certain type of player. But I also expressed my hope that wouldn't happen here. And acknowledged that my bad memories from those earlier games are likely biasing my opinion and that it is unlikely that a lot of people would switch to a 10 year old game just because of that change.
A lot of arguments being attributed to me aren't ones that I have made. I don't run around in fear of half naked NPCs. I do not think there will be "legions," of harassers (I actually explicitly stated the opposite from jump). And I don't think that unequipping pants is some kind of magical mind control device that stops someone from harassing.
I said imagined because this topic is discussing a future ESO feature, not your past experience. Any harassment the request would supposedly prevent is imagined because it has not occurred.
I also specifically use this word personally because I don't think OP's request would have any deterrent effect on people who behave that way, since they been able to remove pants the entire existence of the game.