SilverBride wrote: »sans-culottes wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »Erickson9610 wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »It would be more accurate if the poll was for PC players only because we are the ones that would be affected by it.
Yes, I specifically stated "ESO on PC" several times.
Edit: I misunderstood the context. You mean that the poll should only be able to be voted on by PC players, not that the poll somehow wasn't targeted at PC players.
Yes the edit is what I meant. Not that I want to exclude console players from commenting, but for the actual voting I feel it would give a better idea of what PC players want if only they voted on it.
Given that we have this feature and can have meaningful input on this re: PC, I’m going to have to disagree. The question wasn’t “do exclusively PC players want feature x?” Instead, it was asking if this should be a feature on PC or not. Given that it’s already a console feature, our input is if anything going to be quite informative.
That is why I said console players should be able to comment. But ultimately it will only affect PC players. I don't want my gaming experience determined by others that won't be the least bit affected if PC has a voice chat or not.
SilverBride wrote: »Console and PC have very different experiences and expectations when playing. Our economies are a good example of how very different the game is for the two platforms.
I don't think it's fair for others to have a say in what happens on PC.
Erickson9610 wrote: »Instead of groups demanding you use Discord, groups would demand you use the in-game voice chat
tomofhyrule wrote: »Erickson9610 wrote: »Instead of groups demanding you use Discord, groups would demand you use the in-game voice chat
But again: would they really? Or would the groups that currently use Discord just still use Discord even if an in-game voice existed? Particularly since even the voice chat on consoles as it is now doesn’t allow for a “look in the channel to see a diagram of where to stand” or something similar that many groups use to get positioning.
Again, how many housing enthusiasts said “oh boy, now that ESO has Home Tours, I don’t need EHT anymore so I can just get rid of that addon!” They use EHT for more than just posting and visiting others’ houses, and similarly groups and guilds use Discord for more than just voice chat.
There is no guarantee that PC players would end up switching en masse if such a feature were to exist. Maybe if this had released with ESO ten years ago, but Discord is well established in the ESO PC world at this point. We’d likely still have groups or guilds demand Discord regardless, and then the forum complaints would be “why aren’t people using the in-game vc?”
tomofhyrule wrote: »Erickson9610 wrote: »Instead of groups demanding you use Discord, groups would demand you use the in-game voice chat
But again: would they really? Or would the groups that currently use Discord just still use Discord even if an in-game voice existed? Particularly since even the voice chat on consoles as it is now doesn’t allow for a “look in the channel to see a diagram of where to stand” or something similar that many groups use to get positioning.
Again, how many housing enthusiasts said “oh boy, now that ESO has Home Tours, I don’t need EHT anymore so I can just get rid of that addon!” They use EHT for more than just posting and visiting others’ houses, and similarly groups and guilds use Discord for more than just voice chat.
There is no guarantee that PC players would end up switching en masse if such a feature were to exist. Maybe if this had released with ESO ten years ago, but Discord is well established in the ESO PC world at this point. We’d likely still have groups or guilds demand Discord regardless, and then the forum complaints would be “why aren’t people using the in-game vc?”
JemadarofCaerSalis wrote: »tomofhyrule wrote: »Erickson9610 wrote: »Instead of groups demanding you use Discord, groups would demand you use the in-game voice chat
But again: would they really? Or would the groups that currently use Discord just still use Discord even if an in-game voice existed? Particularly since even the voice chat on consoles as it is now doesn’t allow for a “look in the channel to see a diagram of where to stand” or something similar that many groups use to get positioning.
Again, how many housing enthusiasts said “oh boy, now that ESO has Home Tours, I don’t need EHT anymore so I can just get rid of that addon!” They use EHT for more than just posting and visiting others’ houses, and similarly groups and guilds use Discord for more than just voice chat.
There is no guarantee that PC players would end up switching en masse if such a feature were to exist. Maybe if this had released with ESO ten years ago, but Discord is well established in the ESO PC world at this point. We’d likely still have groups or guilds demand Discord regardless, and then the forum complaints would be “why aren’t people using the in-game vc?”
My fear wouldn't be so much the same people who are using discord going 'just use in game voice!' but rather additional guilds/groups/people would go 'well now that we have an in-game chat, there is no reason to NOT use it' and it would become a requirement for additional guilds and/or content on top of the number of guilds/groups that require discord/voice chat.
I'm really annoyed by how often "optional!" is added to literally every new feature request as a way to preempt valid criticism of the basic idea. Especially when the advocates explicitly ignore all of the social and cultural knock-on effects that would make such an idea technically optional but de facto required in some (or many) circumstances.
With that said, even accounting for "you're not allowed to use any criticisms that the magic word 'optional' would cover," still no. It's a pointless feature that would be a complete waste of dev time and system resources. People who want voice chat have been using Discord (et al.) for almost a decade now.
The only practical use this might have is in PUGs, where a rational person least wants to hear other people (especially since they can just say anything and reporting it turns into 'he-said-she-said'). Anyone doing guild runs or premades who wants VC already has a feature-rich VC platform they have extensive experience with.
The rest of the appeal is the dubious aesthetic of listening to randos talk to their cats, eat their doritos, yell at their spouses, and blast music of highly variable creative merit at everyone doing writs. It feels like this is a suggestion that would primarily appeal to the type of people who cheer at and heckle the on-screen characters in movie theatres, and those that enjoy listening to such.
said no one ever wrote: »If you force me to use a stupid voice chat i will force tyou to listen to sermons from Dr Conrad Vine on youtube while i play the game. Just FYI i will play him louder than anything you are saying so i don't have to hear it.
rootkitronin wrote: »A lot of people here don't seem to understand what the word optional means or have failed to read the subject line of the thread.
Erickson9610 wrote: »From my perspective, if it's optional, then there's no reason players would object. Instead of groups demanding you use Discord, groups would demand you use the in-game voice chat — nothing really changes for those people who don't want to hear other people's voices, especially if voice chat is opt-in to hear like it is with other voice communication apps.
So far, the only legitimate concerns I've heard regard wasting developer resources and network usage. Those are the reasons I'd imagine a voice chat feature on PC would likely not be implemented.
I have no interest in voice chat, and Discord is already being used by those who do want it in ESO. I think there would be a lot of better things for ZOS to target their development resources on.
On the question of it being optional, I think past experience in ESO has been such that a lot of players no longer have any confidence in supporting changes they personally don't want but which are being touted as optional, because the evidence from things like achievements is that when such changes are introduced they are imposed on all players and not made optional at all.
SilverBride wrote: »The bottom line is that most PC players are voting that they do not think PC should have proximity voice chat and wouldn't use it. So why implement it?
sans-culottes wrote: »Mostly I see this as completely harmless, albeit quite unlikely.
sans-culottes wrote: »But worrying about the policing of other people’s fun shouldn’t be our focus, should it?
sans-culottes wrote: »The solution shouldn’t be to stifle speech because people might say something one doesn’t like. That’s why reporting exists. What you find “toxic” might not qualify as such to ZOS.
sans-culottes wrote: »The same way people report it to ZOS on consoles, presumably.
sans-culottes wrote: »If the concern is that people might be toxic, then as you’ve pointed out this already exists in, e.g., zone chat. This also exists in various opt-in Discord servers and so on. It’s really just a matter of from whom does the service originate.